Why my civil rights should NOT be on your ballot today

I am grateful for the lawmakers in states around this beautiful and broken country who have the compassion and courage to lift up legislation that just might recognize some of my sisters and brothers as full citizens. I am also prayerful that those states will see the light of love filter in through voting booths. I am thankful for those of you who will raise your voice, and hopefully the consciousness of your communities for all of our sakes. But know this…my family’s rights should not be left up to the whims of the masses. Sometimes the in-breaking of justice must be vigorously fought for by the few who have been to the mountain top.

Simply stated, civil rights of one group have not been, and will not be given through a popular vote. If civil rights were historically decided by a vote then those who could vote would have ensured that I would be standing in line to do just that. If civil rights are left to the masses to decide then I would not be crowded in line in a soggy middle school in the inner city of Atlanta, GA amidst a glorious sea of color.

One other teeny weeny reason my CIVIL rights should not be on the ballot is that the United States of America is not a theocracy.

But vote we must eh?

This quote from Susan Thistlethwaite helps me get to the polls today: “My Christian faith teaches me that history is a struggle between good and bad, between selfishness and generosity, between cruelty and compassion, and thus between right and wrong. I think an uncritical equivalence, whether political or theological, hides this struggle.
You have to choose.” (Thank you Anne Howard for lifting up her voice this week).

As does this clarion call from David Foster Wallace: “If you are bored and disgusted by politics and don’t bother to vote, you are in effect voting for the entrenched Establishments of the two major parties, who please rest assured are not dumb, and who are keenly aware that it is in their interests to keep you disgusted and bored and cynical and to give you every possible reason to stay at home on primary day. By all means stay home if you want, but don’t bullshit yourself that you’re not voting. In reality, there is no such thing as not voting: you either vote by voting, or you vote by staying home and tacitly doubling the value of some Diehard’s vote.” (Thank you Kate Colussy-Estees for sharing this important quote).

So vote I shall.

Today, though I’m not certain that our current president will see his way to lead with courage and confidence to grant equal rights for all people everywhere, I am certain, with intuition humming deep in my middle-age bones (oh, and the fact that I read), that Mr. Romney will never move on my behalf. He has made it clear that I matter less because I am a woman, a working-class mamma and a lesbian. Today, if the best I can do is vote for the possibility of love and justice unfettered then that is enough.

I pray others will do the same.

About Kimberly Knight

Kimberly has a long history of back-pew sitting, Wednesday night supper eatin' and generally trying God’s patience since 1969. She's lucky enough to have made her technology addiction a career and serves as both the Director of Digital Strategy as a southern liberal arts college and Minister of Digital community with Extravagance UCC.

  • pagansister

    As everyone knows by now, President Obama will have another 4 years—the country saw “the light” if you will. Also more states granted the GLBT community the rights that should have never been denied to begin with. As to this country being in danger now that President Obama has been re-elected—really? What propaganda have you swallowed?

  • Erins1911

    Watch and see. You might take a peek at today’s 312 point drop at the stock exchange.

    But beyond that I really don’t understand how the GLBT community has come to believe the Democrat party has a monopoly on goodness and caring for others. Conservatives give far more of their money to charity than Liberals so watch your position on that high horse you are riding.

    • Kimberly

      I simply base my understanding on what I have heard and read of Mr. Romney’s convictions. I did not claim that Romney spoke for all Republicans but a vote for that man would have been a vote against my own family. No high horse here at all.

  • Erins1911

    Voting for Romney here though I agree with much of what you say and quote. Just not sure there will be much of a country left (nor, coincidently, protected civil rights for any of us) with four more years of the current President.

    • Kimberly Knight

      I have no idea how anyone can think that. I really, really do not understand how anyone can see anything honorable or leader worthy in Romney. I really, really can not understand what (beyond the Fox propaganda and false fears) people can hold that is worse about Obama than Romney. Baffled to say the least.

    • http://stanmanx.com Matt S

      How is the guy who has taken a stand in favor of civil rights going to do more damage to civil rights than the guy who has taken a stand against them?

  • http://www.kirkwooducc.com susannah

    Thank YOU for your thoughts Preacher Kimmie!!!! Love you!


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X