Bonchamps Offers a Very Respectable Catholic Case…

…for supporting Romney. If I undersand him correctly, it boils down to “Obama is, unlike previous Democrats, an obvious and clear enemy of the Church and his war on the Church is a game changer.” I’m refreshed that he doesn’t try to pretend R2 are some sort of great ticket, merely that they suck less than the Tyrant and his vendetta against the Church.

Given that Ratzinger says that it is legit to vote for somebody who supports grave intrinsic evil if there is a proportional reason to do so, I can respect that. What I have not settled in my own mind is the question of whether Obama’s war on the Church is the game changer that makes a vote for the Plastic Android a valid proportional reason. But it is something I am mulling.

I’d be interested in hearing, particularly from people who share my skepticism about both parties, what they think of Bonchamps argument. Please, zealous partisans, let the folks who share my views speak and don’t suck all the oxygen out of the comboxes with partisan bickering.

"What bothers me is that a poll taken reported that a higher percentage of Catholics ..."

Actual prolife Catholics listen to the ..."
"a theory is critical to the extent that it seeks human “emancipation from slavery”, acts ..."

I have been and remain leery ..."
"We are going to see large spikes in suicide in these populations, and a renewed ..."

Actual prolife Catholics listen to the ..."
"Personally I like Peterson because he reads the Bible in a Jungian fashion. And, even ..."

I have been and remain leery ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment