Five Reasons Why Superman Isn’t Jesus

The moment word broke of the new Superman film, Man of Steel, directed by Zack Snyder, the comparisons between Superman and Jesus were bound to happen.

Snyder himself has mentioned it: “I think the relationship between Jesus and Superman is not a thing we invented in this film, it is a thing that has been talked about since the creation of Superman. And in a weird way, probably was talked about more when Superman was created than it is now. It’s one of those things mythologically you take for granted, a little bit.”

Australian scholar Anton Karl Kozlovic has made an academic cottage industry out of naming Jesus figures in movies. One of his classics is “Superman as Christ-Figure: The American Pop Culture Movie Messiah,” published in the Journal of Religion and Film in 2002. His evidence for Superman being a Christ figure in the 1978 and 1980 Christopher Reeves films (for some reason he ignores Superman III (1983) and Superman IV (1987)) range from the reasonable (Superman begins his career at the age of 30) to the ridiculous (when Superman does some feat of daring, someone exclaims “Holy Mackerel!” clearly revealing his divine status).

I’m all for a good Christ figure in the movies. If you want to find some more challenging Christ figures than the typical superhero stuff, try Jackie Earl Haley’s character in Little Children or John Hurt playing Quentin Crisp in The Naked Civil Servant.

But Superman is not a Christ figure. And here are five reasons why.

 1.)   When speaking of the Superman-Christ relationship, commentators inevitably bring up two elements from Superman’s origin story: his Kryptonian name Kal-El, which, roughly translated into Hebrew means “Voice of God,” and his being sent in a capsule by an interplanetary “father” to Earth to save humanity.

Superman was created by two Jewish teenagers living in Cleveland, Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel. His adventures were first published by Action Comics in 1938, but he was developed as a character several years earlier. It seems unlikely that two Jewish boys in the early 20th Century, Bar Mitzvahs still fresh in their minds, would have created a superhuman Christ figure.

The closer parallel is to Moses, who was sent down the Nile in a basket and adopted by people not his own, and who for a time took on the identity of a Gentile. This also suggests Jewish immigrant experiences (Shuster and Siegel were both children of immigrants) in which some Jews adopted Anglicized names to blend in with American society. In fact, Siegel and Shuster sometimes submitted their comic book ideas under the name Bernard J. Kenton.

I don’t think we have any idea today just how segregated Jewish people were from “mainstream” American society in the early 20th century, and how virulently anti-Semitic gentile Americans were in the years leading up to World War II. Rabbi Simcha Weinstein, who has studied the Jewish origins of many comic book superheroes, writes,

“The 1930s were also, arguably, the most anti-Semitic period in American history. Nazi sympathizer Fritz Kuhn of the German-American Bund led legions of rabid followers on marches through many cities, including Siegel and Shuster’s hometown. Radio superstar Father Charles E. Coughlin of the pro-fascist Christian Front was one of the nation’s most powerful men. And Ivy League colleges kept the number of Jewish students to a minimum, while country clubs and even entire neighborhoods barred Jews altogether.”

It seems more likely that Superman reflects the yearning of two kids from immigrant families to find their identities in a hostile American culture. In some ways, Superman is an attempt at assimilation, the desire to be more American than the Americans—all that stuff about “Truth, Justice, and the American Way.” In other ways, Superman takes being alien and turns it into a strength—the very sun of this strange planet, this foreign culture, gives him super powers. This is a pretty neat fantasy for any powerless-feeling kid, and a lasting part of Superman’s appeal.

The REAL Lex Luthor?

2.)   Lex Luthor is not Satan. The resonance between the names “Luthor” and “Lucifer” has been brought up among the Super-Jesus set. Again, this is the wrong mythology for Superman’s Jewish origin. Siegel and Shuster may not have even been aware of the Christian mythology of Lucifer as a fallen angel who became Satan. (And I mean mythology — this story has more to do with Milton than Revelation.) If we’re just going on names alone, “Luthor” could just as easily be Martin Luther, who was an anti-Semite, and who’s teaching on the subject influenced both the German nation and German-Americans in their anti-Semitism.

More likely, Luthor is the flip-side of this mythology of strangely powerful outsiders and aliens Siegel and Shuster were creating. If Superman’s outsider status leads him to do good, Luthor’s outsider status, and evil genius, leads him to wreak vengeful havoc on the world.

3.)   Superman, despite his claim to do justice, is not the Prince of Peace. Saving someone from an oncoming train is not the same as giving them salvation. And more often than not, Superman’s means of achieving his goal is violence.

Superman is one of the common examples of the American Monomyth, as named by Robert Jewett and John Shelton Lawrence. As Jewett and Lawrence explain in The Myth of the American Superhero (Eerdmans, 2002):

“A community in a harmonious paradise is threatened by evil; normal institutions fail to contend with this threat; a selfless superhero emerges to renounce temptations and carry out the redemptive task; aided by fate, his decisive victory restores the community to its paradisiacal condition; the superhero then recedes into obscurity” (6).

The American Monomyth teaches Americans that the structures of democracy are too slow to be trusted, and that we should hold out hope for a vigilante to come along and save us from our own ineptitude and indecision. It affects our political process, from the current gridlock in Congress, to the rise of the Tea Party, to our Presidential elections, to the choice to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, to the shredding of free speech and privacy laws by the Justice Department and the NSA. Ultimately, in wishing to invest undemocratic power in an individual or entity who, by birth or by accident, has superhuman ability, the mythology suggests fascism more than democracy.

Yes, I just said it: Superman is secretly a fascist.

(I don’t think this was an outcome Shuster and Siegel intended or could have foreseen.)

4.)   Superman has a racist past. See cover to the left. Also, see these Superman cartoons from the 1940’s: “Jungle Drums” and “The Japoteurs” by Famous Studios, Paramount’s animation division.

One of the great lies of American culture is the idea that discrimination leads to strong character and “nobility” among oppressed people. As Christopher Isherwood’s character George, the closeted gay professor in A Single Man, says to his shocked class in a lecture on minority relations, “Do you think it makes people nasty to be loved? You know it doesn’t! Then why should it make them nice to be loathed?”

Minorities sometimes attack other minorities, or attempt to place themselves in the mainstream at the expense of other outsiders. American history is full of cultural animosities sown in our vain attempt to attain the chimera of “Whiteness.”

5.) “Oh yeah?” you might be saying, “Maybe Superman was created by Jews but adapted by Christians in an American culture in which Christian mythology predominates.”

Considering how much of the Hebrew Bible was adapted by the early Christians to “prove” that Christ had “fulfilled the prophets,” this would seem to be an apt comparison. There’s nothing the Jewish people have created that we Christians haven’t found a way to appropriate for ourselves.

Jerry Siegel (seated) and Joe Shuster, creators of Superman

And how have Christians repaid Jews for giving us Jesus, Mary, Joseph, and the prophetic tradition on which the Gospels are based? Centuries of anti-Semitism: pogroms, Inquisitions, Holocaust. This is what makes the attempted claims of Superman as Christ figure disturbing: the familiar pattern of Christians appropriating spiritual figures of Jewish origin, then forgetting the specific cultural context of their origins to the point that they freely and guiltlessly practice anti-Semitism.

Shuster and Siegel were rolled over by mainstream American society as well. Despite giving Americans one of our most popular characters and mythologies, by the 1970’s they were forgotten and living in poverty. To avoid bad publicity when the Superman movie came out in 1978, DC Comics agreed to give them a modest pension, and began crediting them as Superman’s creators.

So, what we have in Superman is a beloved figure of Jewish ancestry who’s ethnic and religious origins were erased by white Christians, who’s creators and their descendants were discriminated against by mainstream American culture, who started as a beacon of hope in a dark time and became a capitalist icon.

Okay, maybe he is Jesus.

Next post: Five Reasons Why Jesus Isn’t Superman.

‘The Silver Chalice’ and the Bible in our Minds
A Dance Between Science and Religion
On Mardi Gras with the Mystic Krewe of Apollo de Lafayette
Disquiet Time: A Review
  • Mike Poteet

    I enjoyed your post, but take exception to your assertion that Superman is a secret fascist (a charge leveled against him in the 50s by the anti-comic book, fear-mongering psychologist Frederic Wertham). At the very least, is not an assertion that holds true in most iterations of the “super-lore.” In fact, the most recent addition, Snyder’s “Man of Steel,” directly rebuts this charge: not only are we told that Superman’s mission is to inspire (not directly lead or save others), but also we see the effect his example has on others, as Perry White and other Daily Planet staffers work to save a colleague trapped in rubble. In no “mainstream” version of the mythos that I know of does Superman ever accept the authority to rule over others, even when it is freely offered him (“and, lo, they would make him a king by force…”).

    I do agree, however, that Superman is not Jesus, and vice versa; but am glad there are enough suggestive connections between the two to fuel discussions like this one! Thanks again for a good article!

    • Guest

      Mike, I like your distinction between leadership and inspiration. That’s a nice

    • DrLindsay

      Mike, I like your distinction between leadership and inspiration. I hadn’t noticed the difference in how that was expressed in the movie. And God forbid I should give any credence to Frederic Wertham! :-)

      I think the Dark Knight series deals well with this difficult balance of wanting a crime-fighter or a powerful figure to wipe out threats to civilization, but that figure being a threat to civilization by acting outside the law. Good and difficult piece of comic book philosophy.

  • Rob Lindsay

    Brother Rick. You obviously haven’t read the ‘Superman’ comics lately. The comics Superman has taken on more of a “Christ figure” status than he ever did in the movies. It started about 20 years ago when Superman died at the hands of a monster called Doomsday. He was resurrected a few months later. The “Death and Return of Superman” is still considered one of the great story arcs in the history of comics. It’s almost “Gospel of John” material to some comics fans.

    In today’s comics, Superman is more like “Christ in Gesthemene.” He’s always debating his role in the world, and debating how he should use the powers he’s been given. (“Should I save the world or not?”) Above all, he wishes he could throw away his powers and live life as a normal human being. (“If there is any way this cup can be passed from my lips…”) Today’s Superman is so indecisive, so melancholy, so introspective that at times he makes Hamlet seem like Al Roker the weatherman!

    And while Supeman the icon has become a symbol of capitalism, Superman the comics character is anything but. In his most recent incarnation, he fights the evil schemes of Lex Luthor. In HIS most recent incarnation, Luthor was the Donald Trump of Metropolis, the “egomaniacal billionaire magnate” who owns the city, has all the politicians in his pocket, and continuously steps on the little people – and is only kept in check by Superman thwarting his schemes.

    (Superman himself is the victim of racism in comics. Lex Luthor and others despise him as “alien filth from another planet,” and wrongly assume that Superman saves people in order to “prove his superiority over us humans.” In other words, they believe that humans are a superior race, and that Superman, a Kryptonian, is getting “uppity” by using his powers to benefit mankind.)

    As for violence, well, in the comics, Superman prefers not to use violence unless it’s absolutely necessary (and it often is in Metropolis, where attacks by flying saucers and giant robots are an everyday thing). But even Jesus used violence, when he made a whip and drove the moneylenders out of the temple.

    One very recent story in the comics (called “Grounded”) put Superman in the role of Jesus-Christ-as-God-made-human mode. After spending a few years fighting alien invasions on other planets, Superman fears he has lost touch with the people of Earth. So he undertakes a “Walk Across America,” deliberately walking (not flying) from one coast of the U.S.A. to the other. (The story lasts 12 issues, or one year in the “Superman” comics.)

    On his “Walk Across America,” Superman visits various cities and towns in the United States. (He even visits Cincinnati!) On the way, he talks to ordinary people about the problems they face, about their fears and dreams — and he determines new ways to help them when he can. The story has shades of “Christ as God brought down to Earth, and mingling with the common people.”

    The comics Superman has foregone the maxim of “fighting for truth, justice, and the American way.” His current maxim is simpler: “I’m just here to help.” And as for humility, well, Superman shows a great deal of Christ-like humility in the comics. As Lois Lane recently pointed out, the reason he is the true Superman is that he *doesn’t* use his powers to try to take over the world. He wants to help and redeem humanity, not to rule it. It takes a good deal of Christ-like humility to *NOT* use your super powers to right all the wrongs in the world, but to inspire others to try to correct their own problems.

  • corps_suk

    If Superman were “Moses” then he would have been a traitor to his adopted people (humans), like Moses betrayed the Egyptians, and sided with the Kryptonians to conquer Earth.

  • Mark Antony

    Unlike Jesus, Superman would never “turn the other cheek” when innocents are in danger .. pretty damn big difference right there