Wonder and Dialogue

I decided to spend my Christmas holidays exploring a mystery. What, I wondered, is the Higgs boson about which we’ve heard so much? Having studied physics and astronomy seriously in the University, and having subsequently kept up with developments at a lay level as a lifelong reader of Scientific American I thought I knew a lot of it. Enough to know that somewhere between Schrödinger and Gell-Mann I had lost the narrative. So with the help of Wikipedia and its links I’ve been slowly putting it together. But unless you are fascinated by electro-weak theory and symmetry breaking (which are fascinating but pretty hard to understand for me) we’ll skip that.

The real story is the story of how scientists seem to think. And that narrative is simpler. It goes like this. 1. I wonder why something works the way it works. 2. I develop a theory consistent with what I’ve observed. 3. I think of an experiment that will give me more data and prove my theory right. 4. I find out a bunch of stuff that messes up my simple theory. 5. I construct a more complicated theory, or change my theory altogether. 6. Return to step 3 and repeat ad infinitum.

The ad infinitum is important. Back in 1930 the discovery that atoms consisted of protons, neutrons, and electrons led Max Born to say, “Physics as we know it will be over in six months.” He was right. And wrong. Only a year later physicists realized that it wasn’t nearly that simple. By the time we got to last year, and the first evidence that the theory of the Higgs field accurately reflected reality (with the creation of a Higgs boson) the Standard Theory of sub-atomic particles had 9 types (and their anti-particles) 3 generations of quarks and leptons, 8 colors (of gluons), and thus a total of 61 particles.

And nobody believes that this is complete – because it doesn’t begin to explain gravity. Which is pretty important.

And more amazingly the scientists love that! They don’t want a final theory (and they know they probably can’t get to it anyway.) They want (to use the title of Stephen Wienberg’s classic) to dream of a final theory. They are addicted not to answers, but to wonder. Theories and experiments are just a way of raising the stakes, of getting past the easy and obvious to the complex and wondrous.

Let’s listen to the master: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc

This is suggestive to me of where a dialogue with science might go. Christians are too anxious to wrap things up, to solve problems instead of exploring their complexity. To give answers instead of wondering at the fabulous complexity of the questions.

At a time when religion and science seem increasingly at odds, and in which the importance of both steadily increases, could it be that the human capacity for wonder is something we that we share and could explore together? That it might prove some strand that could bind us in a unity?

"In the Declaration of Independence the phrase "their Creator" is non specific. No specific God ..."

Endowed by Their Creator?
"These people were not fools, they did not choose their words idly, and they were ..."

Endowed by Their Creator?
"Before you start painting America as the country that always has and always will hate ..."

What is a White Supremacist?
"Sulie doesn't strike me as "super-neo-liberal". Just thin-skinned, whiny, and dull-witted - like our president."

Atheism and the New Conditions of ..."

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Riyaz Muhammmad

    Religion calls people to believe in the Unseen. It calls out God as the Supreme being who knows everything – which supports the ad infinitum process scientists keep working on. But religionists unfortunately are the quickest to wrap things up and claim they know it all.

  • Garry Alan Prior

    I think the openness of the dialogue will be determined by how many co-religionists also are present. The concern may well be how comments are reported back. One on one dialogues or where there is only one party from a particular religion attending as a representative, may be more open and less stereo-typed. I have noticed that eg Muslims appear much more pious when other Muslims are around. I expect the same is true for Christians and Jews but may be to a lesser extent. I have been surprised by the interest and encouragement that I have experienced from Muslim friends or colleagues in my Christian walk, and we have discussed theology in a very free manner. We find the attributes of God very satisfying, even as we see Him in different ways. I find some Muslims have a deep interest in and appreciation for Christianity without having any interest in conversion.The one thing that Muslims find incomprehensible, in my experience, is atheism. They simply cannot understand how anyone can have no relationship with or believe that there is no relationship with God. I can pray with Muslims to God for His mercy and where I have come across Muslims in any form of distress, I have offered to pray for them. No one has ever said “No, please don’t do that!”. So I do. Through Christ.

  • ahermit
  • Y. A. Warren

    I believe that wonder, not pretending to fully know, is the greatest form of worship.

    It is unfortunate, in my way of thinking, that the term “fear” is so often used in sacred texts when referring to The Sacred Spirit(s). It seems to me that the term “awe” could be substituted in most cases and come out with a whole new way of looking at Infinite Divinity. In my experience, awe feels much like fear on a physical level, but the two are entirely different in the way we process them into action.

    Fear leads to anger and aggression. Awe is all about wonder and wanting to know more intimately what we perceive as “awesome.” One brings war; the other brings intimacy with infinity.