Two Notre Dame Rebuttals

My post yesterday defending Notre Dame produced a mostly interesting comment box — including some classic Petrine wit. I also received several e-mails, all of them very thoughtful and honest, regardless of their opinion on the matter. As a result, I realize that I ended up casting too wide a net, trapping fish I never intended to catch, and also weaving a net with too wide a mesh, conveniently letting certain fish pass through that perhaps do not deserve it.

And then there is this: Sycamore Trust.

Let me be more clear: I only wanted to address my kin — the know-nothings. Those of us who didn’t go to Notre Dame, don’t know much about it other than the folklore of the Golden Domers on Saturdays, the egg-headed lore of its academic brand name, and the meager bits we get from the news. There are lots of us running around and I think all my points still apply to that motley crew. But there are others that I, being a know-nothing myself, did not consider. There are also a few other things I’m mulling around and might post about later.

In the meantime, here are two fine rebuttals from very different critics: an 82 year-old Jesuit alumnus and an early-twenties medical student.

Dear Mr. Rocha:

I can appreciate your remarks about some of the malcontents who are in criticism of Notre Dame.  I do not believe that the criticism is against the football team; primarily fotsome of the decisions the University has made pertaining to the invitation of speakers and social programs.

It may be difficult for you to believe but the majority of those who make criticism of Notre Dame are alumni of Notre Dame as I am.  We are extremely happy about the success of the football team; we recognize the high academic achievements made by the University, but, we still take to task some of the decisions made by the Administration.

Yes, I was one who truly objected to the presence of the President to speak at a commencement address.  The President is  probably one of the most pro-abortionist Presidents we have ever had.  As a Catholic and more as a Catholic priest, it would be hard for me to approve one who approves of an intrinsic evil as stated by the Church.

Mr. Obama also fabricated his love and understanding of  the teachings of the Church in his address.  Yet , it is he who is getting ready through the HHS mandate to bring about some difficult times for the Church.

In summary, most of the people are not really malcontents.  Even though you have a problem with Catholic identity, I do not.  I am not a right wing extremist priest; nor am I an activist.  I am an 82 year old alumnus, Jesuit priest, who dearly loves the school.  I was at the University at the time of Frank Leahy and Ara Parseghian.  So, I am for excellence in football, academic and  yes, Catholic Identity.  Let us both pray that they can win the National Championship.

I am yours in Our Lady,

Father Joseph LeBlanc, SJ


You are missing the point about ND by such a small amount. It is a wonderfully Catholic place. As you yourself say, being Catholic is not about being perfect. It is about constant conversion. Conversion demands confession. Thus, we must ardently root for Notre Dame and condemn her faults (inviting Obama is probably not one of the faults – and if it is then inviting Bush was too – you know where I stand). But a huge problem of the Football culture is that it becomes the religion of so many lovers of Notre Dame. Now this is not bad in all cases, my grandfather will probably die if they win the National Championship – seriously. But the main is a wonderful lover of God and faithful Catholic.

Furthermore Notre Dame’s football prowess can cause us to miss her faults which we should expose and seek to rectify. One difficulty is that the football culture itself is broken. Have you ever been to a home game? Have you ever stood there as two fucking fighter jets Fly over the stadium? Over the basilica? Over the golden dome? Over our mother? That is terrifying.

I think in a certain sense your love of sport blinds you a bit here.




Thanks to all for your remarkably charitable comments and correspondence.

Oh, one last thing: if ND really is in desperate need of faithful Catholics with academic credentials, then, I might know a guy who’d absolutely LOVE to work there. Just sayin’.


"As another Professor and Doctor of Philosophy wrote, albeit somewhat hyperbolically, in First Things a ..."

By Their Fruits: A Reply to ..."
""...ready to save it by penning a bestseller." Bwahaha!"

By Their Fruits: A Reply to ..."
"I didn't read Rod's book, but the so called Benedict Option, whether the one he ..."

Notes In Defense of Rod Dreher
"You're more gracious to Rod than he deserves in this case. What a snit fit. ..."

Notes In Defense of Rod Dreher

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment