What does this chart tell us about Christian sexual ethics?

There are several possible ways to interpret this chart:

We could view this as:

A. Evidence of Christian hypocrisy.

B. Evidence of Christian honesty.

C. Evidence that the lack of a coherent sexual ethic leaves many Christians adrift.

D. A compelling reason to convert to Buddhism.

E. All of the above.

I found this via Andrew Sullivan, who titled his post: “Which Religions Are the Most Chaste?” That’s not quite what the study found, though.

Kevin Hartnett of the Boston Globe wrote about the research by Amy Adamczyk and Brittany Hayes of the City University of New York. Their chart above comes from survey data of 418,000 people around the world, but note that this chart does not show the probability of premarital sex, but rather the “Probability of Reporting Premarital Sex.”

As Hartnett writes:

Sex is a notoriously difficult subject to study. There are all sorts of reasons people dissemble about what they do, and you can imagine those incentives are even stronger when you’re a woman in a conservative Muslim household being asked whether you had sex before marrying your husband. Aware of these challenges, the researchers ran several statistical tests to assess respondents’ truthfulness. They found that Muslims and Hindus were actually the least likely of all religious groups to fib about premarital sex. This could suggest that Muslims and Hindus have fewer transgressions to lie about; or it could mean that Muslims and Hindus are better dissemblers given the heightened consequences around premarital sex in those cultures.

And, similarly, the chart could mean that Buddhists are having more sex than everyone else, or else it could mean that Buddhists are more honest than everyone else.

Whatever else that chart means, though, I think it supports the argument that “The problem with evangelical sexual ethics is that we haven’t got any.”


"Harassment and abuse I'd think. It's a harassing, abusive tactic after all. (Though if it's ..."

It’s not 2011, and no one’s ..."
"You could help by answering questions instead of constantly ignoring them."

It’s not 2011, and no one’s ..."
"You still haven't explained how evangelising can be separated from politics."

It’s not 2011, and no one’s ..."
"My dude, who art at Carl's shooting poolDennis be his NameMy SUV gone (It's with ..."

It’s not 2011, and no one’s ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • banancat

    in Buddhism, merit can be made to take away the sin (sometimes on their wedding night they will offer the spirits food in the bedroom of the couple who already slept with each other)

    This isn’t much better though, because it is still framing premarital sex as a sin that needs to be forgiven.  So you can get off your high horse and hang out with all the other slut-shamers and sex-shamers.  Maybe I’ll be more receptive to your religion when it stops treating premarital sex as inherently wrong, but until then yours is just like most others.
    Buddhism, merit can be made to take away the sin (sometimes on their
    wedding night they will offer the spirits food in the bedroom of the
    couple who already slept with each other) – See more at:

  • Lol, I’m not a Buddhist. :P I just live around them. But goodness, what’s up with the tone? I’ve never seen Buddhist slam anyone for having sex. I have seen Christians do this.

    All I was doing was responding to the OP that said are Buddhists are just more honest that they had sex. The answer is I think so because its not as big of a deal to them. But feel free to be non-religious and avoid the game altogether. To each his own. A lot of progressive people in any religion, Christianity, included think its not a sin, however.