menu

Katya Covrett (Zondervan Academic): The Editors behind the Great Books in New Testament Studies

Katya Covrett (Zondervan Academic): The Editors behind the Great Books in New Testament Studies August 13, 2020

I have known Katya for a good long while. I enjoy our yearly SBL meal (sad we have to skip this year). She knows a ton about the academic publishing world and I have learned a lot from her insight and experience. She helped me with my Zondervan Critical Introduction to the New Testament 1-2 Thessalonians volume, and we are working together on a few new things. Katya is professional, witty, and collegial—take notes on her wise counsel. Enjoy!


Katya Covrett, Zondervan Academic

Tell us about yourself.

You know this, Nijay, but your readers might be surprised that English is not my first language. Russian is. I was born and raised in Russia. In my twenties, I moved across the Pacific to the US (that way was a much shorter trip) and have now lived in Grand Rapids for over twenty-two years. I was not raised a Christian and only came to faith as a young adult at university, where I was studying English linguistics. After I graduated, Far East Russia Bible College asked me to be their interpreter (the majority of their faculty were English-only speakers). Say you went to Russia to teach; I’d be that person next to you, translating between you and the students in class. I did that for a few years. I enjoyed the work itself, but even more I cherished the opportunity to study the Bible and theology since I was still a very young Christian then. It was at FERBC that I decided to pursue my own theological education. Russia did not have master’s level Bible and theology programs then, so, since I was fluent in English, I came here to study at Grand Rapids Theological Seminary. My degree, an MTS, was evenly split between biblical studies (mostly NT) and theology. My whole reason for going to school was to become a translator of biblical-theological literature, much needed in the Russian Bible colleges and seminaries. Well, that is not how it all worked out.



Few editors I know aspired to be in publishing. They sort of wandered into it and ended up enjoying it. How did you become an editor? What do you enjoy about it?

Indeed. I had no plans to be an editor, much less to be in “acquisitions” (what the heck is that and how contagious is it?). I stumbled into publishing because, well, I needed a job. Opportunities for translation work were slim and turned out an unreliable source of livelihood. With a master’s degree in Bible and theology of all things, I was overqualified for most “regular” jobs. I could teach, but colleges who would allow someone to teach with just a master’s degree, won’t even consider a woman; schools that want a woman, want her with a doctorate. I was in no way ready to pursue a PhD then, not after four years of grad school!

It was in August 2002, three months after graduation, that Zondervan put up a job posting for an editorial assistant. Now, I had applied for many jobs at Zondervan by then, unsuccessfully, but I figured I’d give it one last shot. The job posting was rather generic, just an assistant to proper editors. What I did not know is that they were looking for two assistants—one for trade, one for academic. Because of my degree, I was hired within three weeks and the rest, as they say, is history.

Starting out at “Zee,” I supported four acquiring editors in the church, academic, and reference division in whatever they needed, learning what this “acquisitions” thing was all about. Within two years I was acquiring an occasional book myself and within three years I was promoted to acquisitions editor. Two years after I assumed my new role, we established the Zondervan Academic brand and I have been its primary acquiring editor ever since. While I acquire broadly in biblical studies, theology, philosophy, history, etc., biblical studies has always been my first love.

Since I clearly did not have enough to do as an editor, I recently started a PhD in New Testament at the University of Aberdeen, supervised by Steve Walton through Trinity College Bristol. It is a part-time and distance program and I am still fairly early in it, so it will take me a few years to complete. I should mention here that, after I finish, I have no plans to leave publishing. I am not doing a PhD to change careers but to do what I do better (dv). I simply love what I do.

One of the most satisfying things in my work is partnering with authors to develop their ideas. I love to see a book born from a mere spark of imagination and to walk alongside the author in the journey. But books are not ends in themselves. Seeing books I have acquired and edited have an impact in the academy and the church around the world is the ultimate satisfaction for an editor. It is mission.



What are some things that stand out to you in a book conversation with an author or a book proposal that grab your interest? 

First, of course, is your grasp of the subject on which you propose a book to me and your expertise in the relevant area of biblical studies. That’s a key element. I need to know that you are the person to do this book. This might seem rather basic to you, but, trust me, you’d be surprised what some people propose to us sometimes as “biblical studies.” 

There is something about the way you hold and present your ideas. I used to say an important thing I like to see is your passion for the book, that burning idea within you that has to get out. But having been in academic publishing “a few” years now, I would temper that with humility and charity with which you hold your ideas.

Personality does play a role. Academic publishing is not all dry and theoretically serious (though I know some will disagree). G. K. Chesterton once said that the test of a good religion is whether one can joke about it. I think that goes for the Christian academy and academic publishing as well. Part of this, too, is not taking oneself too seriously (back to that humility thing). Having some fun with academic publishing is certainly something that appeals to me and that will stand out to me in my interaction with prospective authors.

Acquisitions is a personal business and a good relationship between the author and the editor goes a long way to establishing a long-term and fruitful publishing partnership. Because of this, the author’s willingness to listen to the editor is an important factor in the initial contact between us. It can prove significant not only for the success of a proposal with a given press but also for the later editing process. Editors who have been in the business for a long time know what works in a book or book proposal and what doesn’t. Listen to them.



What are your book proposal pet peeves? And what are common, but correctable mistakes that authors make when trying to pitch their book idea? 

Where do I begin?! Just kidding. (Maybe.)

Proposal Pet Peeve #1: Proposal in the body of the email. Just. Don’t. Surely you have an actual word processing program on your computer, no? If not, you might have bigger problems than getting published…

Proposal Pet Peeve #2: Another publisher’s editor addressed in the proposal. Quoting the eminent Dan Reid (retired editor of IVP Academic), “When shopping book proposals to publishers, be sure to delete the name of the last editor/publisher you tried. No matter how prestigious they are.”

Proposal Pet Peeve #3: No comparative literature assessment. Do your research on the competition beforehand and be fair, and honest with yourself, in the assessment of just how much what you are writing overlaps/competes with the lot that’s already out there. 

Proposal Pet Peeve #4: Audience too broad and/or not clearly identified. “This book will be read by scholars, students, pastors, all Christians everywhere, teenagers—goodness, even toddlers’ lives will be changed!” I am exaggerating, of course (but you’d be surprised how not far off this is). It is far more common for academic authors to overestimate who will actually read their book and, as a corollary to that, the level at which they write. Be realistic with identifying your audience; overinflating your expected readership will only make the publisher leery to take you on as an author when your expectations are far beyond what any publisher can fulfill.

Proposal Pet Peeve #5: Typos. Proofread your proposal and any included documents before you hit send. Typos and grammatical errors do not make a good first impression, especially on editors.

When you draw up a proposal, keep it brief (3-5 pages) and to the point. An editor can generally tell from looking at a proposal for just a few minutes whether a given book will work for our press and whether we want to take a deeper look. We can also tell whether the author has done their homework. Editors are busy people; the easier you make it for us to review your proposal and get the point of what you are trying to say, the faster you get a reply and the better your chances for publishing success—that is, an offered contract. I’ll leave it at that since have written elsewhere on putting together a proposal and increasing your chances of getting published (https://womenbiblicalscholars.com/2016/06/02/a-not-entirely-foolproof-guide-to-getting-published-for-academics-part-i/).



Talk about one or two books that you acquired or edited that you are especially proud of and why.

Oh, come on. You cannot expect me to pick just one or two??? Which one of your children is your favorite, Nijay? (NKG: touché)

I am going to be sneaky and highlight one … series. But seriously, quite apart from my little cheat to get around your (rather unreasonable) limit, of all my projects, this series is probably nearest and dearest to my heart and the project I am most proud of having acquired and edited: Biblical Theology for Life. The series editor Jon Lunde and I have been working on it since 2007. Every BTFL volume explores a theme through the Scriptures, with a view not only to describing what the Bible has to say about a given topic but why it is (or should be) relevant today. Already published are volumes by Jon Lunde (discipleship), Chris Wright (mission), Craig Blomberg (wealth), Brian Rosner (personal identity), Douglas Moo and Jonathan Moo (creation care), Nick Perrin (kingdom of God). Forthcoming ones will speak to social justice (Mariam Kovalishyn), alcohol (John Dunne), hope (Murray Smith), sexuality (Nate Collins), faith (Jeanette Hagen Pifer), race and ethnicity, violence, and other themes. The way each and every BTFL volume came about has a unique story I could tell, though probably not for this interview. This has been an exciting series and a superb team of contributors I have ever had the privilege to work with.



There are many good pieces of scholarship by biblical scholars, but we are not necessarily good at the art of writing. If you were to help an author improve their writing and communication skills, what would you recommend? 

To improve your writing you must do two things: read a lot and write a lot. I am certainly not the first one to point out the connection between these activities. 

Even if you write primarily for the academy—and perhaps because you do—you need to read broadly and learn from good writers in other genres. Just because you are writing for other academics does not mean it must be dry, long, boring, or follow some, often unspoken, convention. A well-written academic work is a joy to read (and to edit).

Certainly academics know that you learn to write, well, by writing. But for many scholars, the greatest hurdle to writing is not simply honing your writing skill but finding time and space to write in the first place.

There are two books I would recommend for scholars who wish to improve their writing craft and to find time to write: Helen Sword’s Stylish Academic Writing and Air and Light and Time and Space: How Successful Academics Write. The former focuses on the craft, the latter on the essential habits of successful academic writers. I can’t recommend these two books enough. They have helped to inform and improve my own writing skills and habits and I hope they will do so for you.



Explain how you define and interpret “success” in your industry?

I think that, in publishing, success is or should always be about great content, scholarly or otherwise. We are nothing if what we publish is not good enough. That’s the baseline, the assumption, the cornerstone of all we do. It needn’t even be a question—great content is where we start.

Next, I would say longevity, standing the test of time. A book that makes a splash and is forgotten a year after, is not, to me, a success. Our books are “successful” if year and after year they are being read and are meeting the needs of scholars, students, and pastors who use them. 

Lastly, sales. How many copies a book sells in the first year(s) of its life and how well it settles into its longevity is definitely a metric of success, though admittedly, not always the determinative one. The two elements above have to be the foundation of it. 



Can you give some thoughts and predictions about how publishing in biblical studies can and/or should change in the next 10 years? 

So much to say, so little space! Since I am already pushing beyond the limits of my word count—editor, heal thyself—I will offer one reflection. 

I hope and pray that publishing in biblical studies will become more diverse. Historically, the discipline has been dominated by white men (please understand that I have nothing against white men; many of my best friends among authors are white guys), but this must change. It is changing, however slowly, and yet there is a lot of work to do. When I think back to when I started in publishing nearly twenty years ago, the thought Oh, shouldn’t our publishing be more diverse? was a concern hardly articulated with any regularity. Today, it is a question we mull over at nearly every acquisitions meeting. As I have written elsewhere, for the representation of women and minority scholars in Christian academic publishing to change, “it has to be a publishing vision upfront—not an afterthought—and a commitment in the publisher’s acquisitions strategy and throughout the life of the edited work or a series” (https://womenbiblicalscholars.com/2016/05/19/what-i-learned-about-gender-and-diversity-from-christian-academic-publishing/). Zondervan Academic has made this commitment and, as our friendly competitors do so as well, we will begin to see the tide change for the better.

 


If you were wanting to invite “fresh talent” to publish with your press, what is your pitch (right here and right now!)? How do you express your press’ identity and purpose and how do you want to shape biblical studies?

I love my team at Zondervan Academic. We see ourselves as bunch of Bible and theology nerds who love books and love to create books for others who wish to grow in their understanding and their faith. But we also take our mission seriously. In everything we publish, we seek to reflect the great Christian tradition’s breadth and diversity both theological and global; this much you can read on our website. But there are a couple of things you won’t learn there—what makes Zondervan Academic tick.

One of the highest values that was drilled into me early on at “Zee” was what we term editorial excellence. In the movie Genius, a story about the legendary editor Maxwell Perkins, based on Scott Berg’s biography Max Perkins: Editor of Genius, there is a quote with which I deeply resonate. Colin Firth, as Perkins, says, “That’s what we editors lose sleep over, you know. Are we really making books better or just making them different?” It goes back to that essential success metric of great content

Zondervan Academic’s goal is to make our authors’ books better. Whatever we choose to publish, we want to do so excellently. For this reason, each author’s book at Zondervan Academic is cared for by not one but two in-house editors: the acquisitions editor (me) who together with you develops a publishing strategy and then works closely with you through the substantive edit, and a production editor who sees the book through its final stages of editing, composition, and production to that newly minted book in your hand.

But writing and editing a great book is only the beginning of its path to finding its readers. We have a veritable army of publishing professionals—editorial managers, designers, compositors, production specialists—to shepherd your book through a carefully designed publishing process. And, once the book is out, we have the best marketing team for getting your book into the hands of its readers. Our marketers are as innovative as they are fun. They get involved with each book and author months before publication and work tirelessly on your behalf to amplify your voice. And they love when our author community receives regular additions of fresh, new voices.

The importance of publishing fresh talent was impressed upon me early on in my acquisitions career by my then-boss, Lyn Cryderman. Shortly after I entered acquisitions, he called me into his office. “I have a challenge for you,” he said. (I did not pass out, but it was a close call.) “Over the years, Zondervan has published numerous premier scholars in biblical-theological studies. What are we doing to seek out and publish those who will be premier scholars in ten, fifteen, twenty years?” The question stuck with me and I have made an intentional effort since to seek out young scholars, as you well know, Nijay. Indeed, my lingering question since that day has been of the role we publishers have played in the making of today’s premier scholars by giving them opportunities to get published. I think our academic catalog speaks for itself in how well we have been able to achieve publishing fresh voices alongside seasoned one. Here is your invitation to add your voice to the chorus.

"I am of the opinion that Pastor # 1 had the more appropriate answer. Of ..."

“We Should Be More Like the ..."
"Should also mention EA Speiser's Anchor Bible commentary and especially Claus Westermann's three-volume commentary. Although ..."

New Blog Series: “My Top 6 ..."
"Go back early enough and one finds that there was no 'early' church, but at ..."

“We Should Be More Like the ..."
"Most of the time, the early church were cantankerous, judgmental and disagreeable iconoclasts. They couldn't ..."

“We Should Be More Like the ..."

Browse Our Archives