Wanting it both ways

Wanting it both ways March 9, 2010

From Victor Davis Hanson:

We want all the dividends of industrial society, but an 18th century wilderness at the same time. . . .The redwood deck is beloved, not the falling coast redwood tree; kitchen granite counters are de rigueur, not the blasting at the top of the granite mountain; the Prius is a badge of honor, not the chemical plant that makes its batteries; we now like stainless steel frigs, but hate steel’s coke, and iron ore, and electricity lines; arugula is tasty, not the canal that brings water 400 miles to irrigate it; I support teacher unions and -studies courses in the public schools, but not with my Ivy-League bound children. . . .

The well-off like nice cars, tasteful homes, good food, and appropriate vacations — but not the oil, gas, coal, nuclear energy, transmission lines, timber, cement, farmland, water pumps, etc., that bring that to them.

"So you are saying something like: "It depends on what the meaning of the word ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"I don't know what you mean by "GOP." Do you mean Federal Republican legislators, or ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"Related to my earlier comment, the graphic for this post has less and less explanatory ..."

The Revolt of the Center?
"The question is what is the nature of attraction, not the pastoral care practice."

Methodists Gone Wild

Browse Our Archives