DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization

DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization

After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen human embryos, engendered in fertility labs, are human beings with a right to life, panic was stirred up that the ruling would endanger the practice of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

So the Alabama state legislature, dominated by Republicans, swiftly passed a measure granting immunity to IVF providers if they damage or destroy any of the many human embryos they routinely generate.

Other Republican politicians, for all of their pro-life reputations, are also rallying behind the IVF cause.  They say that helping mothers have a baby is being pro-life, despite what happens to the extras.  But they clearly fear a political backlash if they oppose the popular medical procedure.

Now pro-life organizations are striking back, running ads against politicians they once supported, saying the Republican laws to protect IVF clinics, which other states are now considering, amount to a “license to kill.”

Read this for a survey of the controversy.

So what do you think?  What constitutes being “pro-life” in a situation like this?  Should politicians take a prudential position on this issue if it would affect their re-election?  How should pro-lifers promote their cause in what seems like an increasingly anti-life climate?

 

"That is a very good point"

The Limits of War
"I can’t really say I enjoy seeing him fail. The costs to the whole world ..."

The Limits of War
"I'm deeply suspicious. The real question is that of conversion. Yes, one can pave the ..."

The Limits of War
"Peter Heather in his book on Christendom suggests cultural and religious change is a top ..."

The Limits of War

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books is the Book of Psalms divided into?

Select your answer to see how you score.