DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization

DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization March 22, 2024

After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen human embryos, engendered in fertility labs, are human beings with a right to life, panic was stirred up that the ruling would endanger the practice of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

So the Alabama state legislature, dominated by Republicans, swiftly passed a measure granting immunity to IVF providers if they damage or destroy any of the many human embryos they routinely generate.

Other Republican politicians, for all of their pro-life reputations, are also rallying behind the IVF cause.  They say that helping mothers have a baby is being pro-life, despite what happens to the extras.  But they clearly fear a political backlash if they oppose the popular medical procedure.

Now pro-life organizations are striking back, running ads against politicians they once supported, saying the Republican laws to protect IVF clinics, which other states are now considering, amount to a “license to kill.”

Read this for a survey of the controversy.

So what do you think?  What constitutes being “pro-life” in a situation like this?  Should politicians take a prudential position on this issue if it would affect their re-election?  How should pro-lifers promote their cause in what seems like an increasingly anti-life climate?

 

"If you think Christ came in the flesh, as the new Adam, then yes. I ..."

Why People Are Converting to Lutheranism
"I get that concern. In my world, what is very common and very sad, though ..."

Why People Are Converting to Lutheranism
"The fullest incarnation of God is the new humanity ...No."

Why People Are Converting to Lutheranism
"Exactly. The fullest incarnation of God is the new humanity, which begins in Christ, but ..."

Why People Are Converting to Lutheranism

Browse Our Archives