DISCUSS: The Death of God

DISCUSS: The Death of God

The โ€œdeath of Godโ€ is a claim made by Nietzsche and arch-liberal theologians who embrace what they call โ€œChristian atheism.โ€ But Luther and the Lutheran Confessions say that God did die on the crossโ€“for usโ€“by virtue of the Two Natures of Christ. What are the implications of that?

Quoting Luther, from Article VIII, โ€œThe Person of Christ,โ€ Formula of Concord Solid Declaration, in Concordia: A Readerโ€™s Edition of the Book of Concord, pp. 588-589:

If it cannot be said that God has died for us, but only a man, we are lost; but if Godโ€™s death and a dead God lie in the balance, His side goes down and ours goes up like a light, empty scale. Yet He can also readily go up again, or leap out of the scale! ย But He could not sit on the scale unless He become a man like us, so that it could be called Godโ€™s dying, Godโ€™s martyrdom, Godโ€™s blood, and Godโ€™s death. For God in His own nature cannot die; but now that God and man are united in one person, it is called Godโ€™s death when the man dies who is one substance or one person with God.

Some theologians, including some evangelicals and even some Lutherans, reject the substitutionary atonement because they think it would be unjust if God punished His son for what we did.ย  How does that and similar arguments show an inadequate understanding of the Trinity?

What are some other implications of viewing God through the lens of Good Friday?

ย 

"I wonder about the rate of hip, knee, and shoulder replacements in the two countries' ..."

Monday Miscellany, 5/12/25
"I wasn't learning anything from the accompanying narrative, so consulted Wikipedia, to boot:The ceremony at ..."

Monday Miscellany, 5/12/25
"We don't go out, save to church functions. We don't have friends over and they ..."

Monday Miscellany, 5/12/25
"I've made this comment before, but since you keep making the same point, I'll continue ..."

Monday Miscellany, 5/12/25

Browse Our Archives