G.O.P. woes are the Christians’ fault

G.O.P. woes are the Christians’ fault

I predicted this would happen. Erstwhile conservative columnist Kathleen Parker is saying that the Republican defeat and its continuing hopeless prospects are due to religious voters. From Giving Up on God – washingtonpost.com:

As Republicans sort out the reasons for their defeat, they likely will overlook or dismiss the gorilla in the pulpit. . . .

To be more specific, the evangelical, right-wing, oogedy-boogedy branch of the GOP is what ails the erstwhile conservative party and will continue to afflict and marginalize its constituents if reckoning doesn’t soon cometh.

Simply put: Armband religion is killing the Republican Party. And, the truth — as long as we’re setting ourselves free — is that if one were to eavesdrop on private conversations among the party intelligentsia, one would hear precisely that. . . .

But they need those votes!

So it has been for the Grand Old Party since the 1980s or so, as it has become increasingly beholden to an element that used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners. . . .

Which is to say, the GOP has surrendered its high ground to its lowest brows. In the process, the party has alienated its non-base constituents, including other people of faith (those who prefer a more private approach to worship), as well as secularists and conservative-leaning Democrats who otherwise might be tempted to cross the aisle. . . .

It isn’t that culture doesn’t matter. It does. But preaching to the choir produces no converts. And shifting demographics suggest that the Republican Party — and conservatism with it — eventually will die out unless religion is returned to the privacy of one’s heart where it belongs.

Religious conservatives become defensive at any suggestion that they’ve had something to do with the GOP’s erosion. And, though the recent Democratic sweep can be attributed in large part to a referendum on Bush and the failing economy, three long-term trends identified by Emory University’s Alan Abramowitz have been devastating to the Republican Party: increasing racial diversity, declining marriage rates and changes in religious beliefs.

Suffice it to say, the Republican Party is largely comprised of white, married Christians. Anyone watching the two conventions last summer can’t have missed the stark differences: One party was brimming with energy, youth and diversity; the other felt like an annual Depends sales meeting. . . .

Meanwhile, it isn’t necessary to evict the Creator from the public square, surrender Judeo-Christian values or diminish the value of faith in America. Belief in something greater than oneself has much to recommend it, including most of the world’s architectural treasures, our universities and even our founding documents.

But, like it or not, we are a diverse nation, no longer predominantly white and Christian. The change Barack Obama promised has already occurred, which is why he won. . . .

The young will get older, of course. Most eventually will marry, and some will become their parents. But nonwhites won’t get whiter. And the nonreligious won’t get religion through external conversion. It doesn’t work that way.

Given those facts, the future of the GOP looks dim and dimmer if it stays the present course. Either the Republican Party needs a new base — or the nation may need a new party.

Non-religious people don’t get converted? Only religious people get converted? Then what are they converting from? Of course, what oozes through this column is “classism”; that is, snobbery and contempt for people perceived to be from a lower class that oneself. Note all that “lowbrow” talk, as if Christians are Neanderthals and don’t think, unlike Kathleen Parker.

Still, does she have a point? America has drifted far from its Christian moorings, as all of us lowbrow critics are always complaining. So how can Christians expect to wield political influence?

"I remember Subway stamps, and how the Subway store nearest my apartment had a register ..."

DISCUSS: What Makes America Great?
"Natural science, as a minimalist epistemology orchestrated to give a predictable account of phenomena, was ..."

Weird Science & the New Social ..."
"I know the speculations that are concocted from various aspects of quantum theory. That is ..."

Weird Science & the New Social ..."
"Let's not forget the S&H Green Stamps that the supermarket gave you with every purchase. ..."

DISCUSS: What Makes America Great?

Browse Our Archives