Joe Carter at First Things alerts us to an important post from David Koyzis at Notes from a Byzantine-Rite Calvinist: Why abortion is different. He says that, yes, there are many political issues that we should be concerned about. But abortion is not just one of many. It is qualitatively different:
Not all issues necessarily have the same import or significance – something the language of morality may mask. In fact, there is a qualitative difference between abortion and the cluster of issues touched on above. In the case of the latter, no one disputes that the environment must be protected; the current debate revolves around how best to do so. Some favour a market-oriented approach, while others are convinced that government must play a central role. Again no one denies the desirability of furnishing the best health care to all citizens. Disagreement arises over whether this is best done through private or public insurance plans. Though Canadians and Americans have taken different paths on the issue, both approaches have their flaws – serious flaws, as it turns out, which illustrates that calling health care a moral issue cannot itself resolve the political debate.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In