DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization

DISCUSSION: In Vitro Fertilization

After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen human embryos, engendered in fertility labs, are human beings with a right to life, panic was stirred up that the ruling would endanger the practice of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

So the Alabama state legislature, dominated by Republicans, swiftly passed a measure granting immunity to IVF providers if they damage or destroy any of the many human embryos they routinely generate.

Other Republican politicians, for all of their pro-life reputations, are also rallying behind the IVF cause.  They say that helping mothers have a baby is being pro-life, despite what happens to the extras.  But they clearly fear a political backlash if they oppose the popular medical procedure.

Now pro-life organizations are striking back, running ads against politicians they once supported, saying the Republican laws to protect IVF clinics, which other states are now considering, amount to a “license to kill.”

Read this for a survey of the controversy.

So what do you think?  What constitutes being “pro-life” in a situation like this?  Should politicians take a prudential position on this issue if it would affect their re-election?  How should pro-lifers promote their cause in what seems like an increasingly anti-life climate?

 

"I really don't think Iran would be loath to use nukes and I think the ..."

The Limits of War
"We did not have total victory over German in WWI in the same manner as ..."

The Limits of War
"Neither Heather nor I are saying these conversions of convenience produced fervent believers-more likely nominal ..."

The Limits of War
"That is a very good point"

The Limits of War

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The love of money is the root of all evil"?

Select your answer to see how you score.