2022-10-31T11:59:34-04:00

Way back in 2017, I blogged about how some people were believing that Donald Trump is featured in Bible prophecy.  Now it is being said that Trump is the second coming of Christ Himself.

This blasphemy is put forward by a South African immigrant turned End Times expositor named Helgard Müller in a book entitled President Donald J. Trump, The Son of Man – The Christ.  The author argues that the Son of God and the Son of Man are two different persons.  Jesus is the Son of God, but Trump is the Son of Man, who will come to rule the world.

I’ll let the author explain his argument.  What follows is the editorial description from Amazon.com, which Müller evidently wrote himself.  (I am not going to link to the book at that site.  When readers buy a book on Amazon that I link to, I get a small commission, but I fear profiting even a few cents from this book, lest I incur God’s wrath.)  The paragraphing is mine:

During the presidency of President Donald Trump, it became evident to me that the prophecies about the Son of Man, as predicted by Jesus in the Bible were, to a significant extent, fulfilled at the hands of Mr Trump.

The Bible speaks about two different Christs-or Messiahs. Jesus, the Son of God is the one Christ, whereas the Son of Man is the other. Jesus always referred to the Son of Man in the third person. The greatest distinction or significance between the Son of Man and the Son of God (the Lamb) is their respective positions at the throne of God. There are numerous differences between the Son of God and the Son of Man, but overall, people read these scriptures and they do not realize that the Son of God (the Lamb) stands in front of the throne of God, whereas the Son of Man, is positioned on the right hand of God.

Jesus spoke about two different killings in the four gospels of the New Testament. People read these scriptures and are unaware that Jesus (the Son of God) predicted his own killing in the first person, as opposed to the several prophecies that He made in respects to the Son of Man who will be crucified.

The New Testament speaks about “two Kings;” Jesus, the Son of God, is the “King of the Jews,” whereas the Son of Man is the “King of Kings” who will be a world-ruler, and He will rule all the nations (the tribes) of the earth with a rod of iron.

This book will explain in depth how “Donald John Trump’s” full name literally means: “The Ruler of the World, graced by Yahweh (the LORD) and a descendant of a Drummer.” Upon reading this book, the reader will be captivated when they realize how President Donald John Trump fulfilled most of the prophecies as the Son of Man. It speaks about End Time Prophecies and Biblical revelations regarding “President Donald J. Trump, the Son of Man. The Christ.”

Using the “Look Inside!” feature on Amazon, we can read the Introduction, which begins, “President Donald J. Trump is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords!  The Son of Man who will be seated at God’s right hand and coming on the clouds of Heaven!” You can also read the first chapter and see the titles of the 41 chapters, which give you an idea about where the author goes with this.

You can read more about this book and its contents from this review by Matt Labash, a satirical journalist who is also an evangelical Christian (and the product of a Lutheran school!).  He uses humor to condemn the book, as opposed to my indignant denunciation, but he tells us more about it, such as listing the parallels that Müller finds between Trump and Jesus:

  • Jesus is thought of as The Christ. Trump’s father Fred’s middle name is actually “Christ.”
  • Jesus decried false prophets. Trump decried fake news.
  • Jesus casts out demons, while Trump casts out Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who the unimpeachable source, Alex Jones, has claimed are “literally demons from hell.”
  • Jesus referenced the word “truth” 22 times in the King James version of the gospels. Trump started the social media app Truth Social in order to combat Big Tech liars like those at Twitter and Facebook and “JewTube” (Helgard’s epithet).
  • Jesus was betrayed by his disciple Judas. Trump was betrayed by his disciple Mike Pence.
  • Jesus was literally crucified between two criminals. Trump was figuratively crucified between Michael Flynn and Roger Stone (both of whom he pardoned).
  • Joseph of Arimathea was a rich man who had compassion for the Son of God, and buried him in fine linen. Whereas Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, who has relentlessly pushed claims that the 2020 election was stolen from the Son of Man, is “a multimillionaire who sells fine linen.”

Could this all be a joke?  A parody of End Time prophecies?  Fake news by a never-Trumper attempting to get his Christian supporters to drop him?

One might think so when reading things like this:

When I heard some people call Mr. Trump ‘Tangerine Jesus’ I recall the scriptures of Matthew 17: 1-3 where Jesus’ face did shine as ‘orange’ as the sun. The comparisons between Jesus, the Son of God whose face turned  ‘orange as the sun’  and the Son of Man’s (President Donald J. Trump) face who is the color ‘orange’ is enormously great.

But the book includes anti-semitic ravings and digressions on South Africa including nostalgia for apartheid that are hard to imagine coming from a joker.  And Müller is the author of another unhinged book in which he contends that the Bible does not teach monotheism but rather the existence of five gods.

His conclusion is staggering in its idolatry:

“Make President Donald J. Trump great so that you can have eternal life and not perish (John 3: 14-15)! For whosoever shall be ashamed of Jesus, the Son of God …..of him shall President Donald J. Trump, the Son of Man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his father’s, and of the holy angels.”

I do see one element of Bible prophecy that this book would seem to fulfill, even as the Bible definitively and explicitly shoots down its claim.  Jesus says that in the last days, “false christs and false prophets will arise” and will even perform miracles (Matthew 24:24).  But “if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it” (Matthew 24:23).

Now Trump doesn’t make this claim of himself.  And even his most fervent supporters don’t go this far, with the exception of Müller and the handful of Amazon reviewers who gave it 5 stars.  And whoever put up the billboard pictured here.  Maybe there are more than I realize. But one can certainly support Trump without believing that he is the Christ.  And yet, I suspect we will be hearing from the Left, on the basis of this book coming out, that “evangelicals believe that Trump is Jesus Christ.”

That this self-published book should not be taken seriously should be obvious.  But it does illustrate a phenomenon that we need to be aware of.   Human beings are naturally religious, and in the absence of true religion, false religions rush into the void.  One feature of “natural” religion as opposed to the “revealed” religion of Christianity, is the temptation to divinize your leaders.

This is commonplace in paganisms of one kind or another.  The ancient Egyptians believed that Pharaoh was a god.  Roman Emperors were proclaimed to be gods, made so by the human action of a vote from the Senate. Christians’ refusal to worship them as such was a major reason Christianity was persecuted so savagely.

The Bible gives accounts of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar’s attempt at deification, which led Daniel to the lion’s den (Daniel 3), and that of the Persian king Darius, which led Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego to the fiery furnace (Daniel 6).   And then there is the case of Herod Agrippa, king of Judea:

On an appointed day Herod put on his royal robes, took his seat upon the throne, and delivered an oration to them. And the people were shouting, “The voice of a god, and not of a man!” Immediately an angel of the Lord struck him down, because he did not give God the glory, and he was eaten by worms and breathed his last.  (Acts 12:21-23)

 

UPDATE:  There is a second book that makes the same argument, also on Amazon:  Donald J. Trump:  The Second Coming of Christ by Holy Ghost Writer.

 

Illustration: Billboard in Georgia, photo by Rev. Bill Bond via Pastor Criticizes Now-Removed Fort Ogelthorpe Billboard Comparing Trump to Jesus, News 9 video

2022-10-28T17:28:41-04:00

Here is a topic for both Halloween and Reformation Day, both of which fall on this day, a way to bring them together:  Reflections on Hell (a scary topic for All Hallows Eve, when the demons were thought to come out) and reflections on how Christ saves us  from Hell (a joyous topic that is at the essence of the Reformation).

These thoughts were occasioned by long-time reader Tom Hering, who in his comment in Friday’s discussion about what reforms the church needs today said this:

Some churches are so earthly minded that they’re no heavenly good. Preachers need to remind us that our goal is joyful, eternal life with Jesus, and not a fulfilled life here and now. Preachers also need to remind us of the danger of Hell. Indeed, of the reality of Hell. To deny or downplay Hell is to deny or downplay the Savior. I mean, if Jesus doesn’t save us from eternal conscious torment in Hell, what exactly does He save us from? Can we even call Him “Savior”?

Preaching about Hell has become rare, even in conservative churches.  Of course, the prospect of eternal punishment makes everyone uncomfortable.  And the topic is controversial, likely to put off people in our secular climate.

And yet, despite this neglect, it turns out that most people in our secular climate do believe in Hell.  According to a Pew Study, 62% of American adults–nearly two-thirds–believe in Hell.  Not only do 79% of Christians believe in eternal punishment, so do 28% of Americans who are “nothing in particular”!

And what they believe Hell to be is not simply a shadowy or symbolic condition, but actual eternal torment.  As the Pew Study summarizes,

In the case of hell, the survey asked about five different traits. About half of all U.S. adults – the vast majority of the 62% who believe in hell – say that people in hell definitely or probably experience psychological suffering [53%], become aware of the suffering they created in the world [53%], experience physical suffering [51%], and are prevented from having a relationship with God [49%]. A slightly smaller share (44%) say they believe people in hell definitely or probably can meet Satan.

Though most Christians and even many non-Christians can accept the existence of Hell, I think the 21% of those in the Christian orbit who do not, do so for theological reasons.  They reason that God is loving, He is just, and He is merciful, so that He could never condemn anyone eternally.

Such reasoning comes from a high view of God and emerges out of a pious and tender heart.  And yet it is an example of what J. G. Hamann criticized in a different context in his London Writings.  It is an attempt to approach God “through His attributes,” rather than through His self-revelation in the Word of God.

That is, we can draw out the characteristics of God. He is indeed loving, just and merciful.  But He is not just a collection of characteristics that we can then set against each other.  Hamann was concerned that the rationalist theologians of the Enlightenment were treating God as an abstraction, as a mere idea, rather than as a Person.  Such descriptions of God–to which we could add other attributes such as being all-knowing, all-powerful, etc., etc.–are certainly valid extractions from Scripture, but descriptions of a person are not the same as the actual person, who will have many more facets than we can comprehend.

The issue isn’t speculating whether or not God is too good to create Hell.  The issue is whether there is such a place.  And if there is–and God’s revelation says that it is–it does not contradict the other things Scripture tells us about God, such as His goodness, even though we cannot get our minds around them all.

But we do not need to fear Hell.  After His crucifixion, which atoned for the sins of the world, Christ descended into Hell, an act of victory over Satan, just as He has invaded the devil’s domain in our hearts to bring us rescue and salvation.

This good news that we are saved not by our own works but by the work of Christ on our behalf is the message of the Reformation and of Reformation Day.

28 For when we had been created by God the Father, and had received from Him all manner of good, the devil came and led us into disobedience, sin, death, and all evil, so that we fell under His wrath and displeasure and were doomed to eternal damnation, as we had merited and deserved. 29 There was no counsel, help, or comfort until this only and eternal Son of God in His unfathomable goodness had compassion upon our misery and wretchedness, and came from heaven to help us. 30 Those tyrants and jailers, then, are all expelled now, and in their place has come Jesus Christ, Lord of life, righteousness, every blessing, and salvation, and has delivered us poor lost men from the jaws of hell, has won us, made us free, and brought us again into the favor and grace of the Father, and has taken us as His own property under His shelter and protection, that He may govern us by His righteousness, wisdom, power, life, and blessedness.

–Luther, the Second Article of the Creed, Large Catechism

Illustration:  “The Harrowing of Hell” (1933) by Nicholas Roerich, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

2022-10-24T18:23:33-04:00

Math scores for fourth and eighth graders dropped to their lowest level ever.  Reading scores erased three decades of progress.

These were the findings of the 2022 National Assessment of Student Progress, also known as “the nation’s report card.”  Average math scores for eighth graders dropped to 274 out of a possible 500.  Their reading scores dropped 3 points to 260. Fourth graders dropped to 236 in math and 217 in reading.

The drops were across the board, in every state and every demographic.  According to Beverly Perdue, head of the research group, “There was really hardly any difference between a poor, economically deprived rural community and a very sophisticated ZIP code.”

The obvious culprit would be the COVID shutdowns.  Some school districts had canceled in-person classes for two years, attempting on-line learning instead.  So a drop in test scores was expected.

But test scores also declined in schools that remained open!  So the failure to learn in American classrooms must not just be due to the COVID shutdowns.  There must be deeper problems.

I would propose some factors:  bad curriculum, bad teaching, and bad teacher training.

See, for example, our post Resolution and Resistance in Teaching Reading, about how science has conclusively demonstrated that the most effective way to teach reading is by phonics, and yet how the education establishment is resisting that approach anyway.  And see our post Teacher Education Programs Don’t Teach How to Teach, about how university education departments have been neglecting instruction in teaching methods in favor of political indoctrination and oppression studies.

I suspect this focus on “critical pedagogy,” with its emphasis on indoctrinating children on issues of race, gender, and the LGBTQ+ cause–aside from being morally problematic–is taking time away from academic instruction.

At least educators seem to be shaken by this data of academic collapse. Says Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona:

“The results in today’s Nation’s Report Card are appalling and unacceptable. . . . This is a moment of truth for education. How we respond to this will determine not only our recovery, but our nation’s standing in the world.”

Says Peggy Carr of the National center for Education Statistics:

“These mathematics results are historic. . .  “They are the largest declines in mathematics we have observed in the entire history of this assessment.”

Says Beverly Perdue again:

“This is not the result simply of a horrible three years for students, this is a result of a realized generational decline.”

Some educators are blaming social injustice, student’s mental problems, and their inability over this period to collaborate with each other, reflecting the social and psychological preoccupation in education today, as well as the over-emphasis on group work over individual achievement, all of which, I would argue, contribute to the decline in learning.

Here is my suggestion.  In light of the failures of the current educational theories, try something else.  Try classical education.

 

Illustration:  FAIL by Amboo Who? via Flickr, Creative Commons 2.0

 

2022-10-25T08:13:32-04:00

To go to a worship service, you put on a virtual reality helmet in the comfort of your home and click on a link that takes you to a cartoon version of a church.  You yourself are there as a cartoon avatar and you will be greeted by other cartoon avatars of the other worshippers.  One might be in the guise of a Veggie Tale character.  Another may be a Warrior Princess.  Or a superhero.  Or a fashion model bedecked in expensive but virtual designer clothes paid for with real money.

As you sit in a cartoon pew, cartoon worship leaders perform music, and then a cartoon preacher gives a message.  If there is to be a baptism, this happens in computer-generated virtual water, whereupon the candidate in the virtual reality helmet at home kneels down to simulate being immersed in the water.

Mark Zuckerberg, the head of Facebook who changed the name of his company to “Meta” to reflect his new ambitions, says that his goal is to make “immersive digital worlds” into “the primary way that we live our lives and spend our time.”  He dreams of the time when we can all stay at home wearing virtually reality helmets, enabling us to work, shop, go to school, and socialize in the metaverse.

Some churches are already offering worship services in the metaverse, as described above.  I blogged about this phenomenon in my post The Metaverse Gives Us Metachurch.  You might want to read that post again to appreciate what follows.

One of the articles in the special Religion & Liberty issue that I blogged about yesterday is Worship in the Metaverse by A. Trevor Sutton.  He is a Lutheran pastor with whom I collaborated in our book Authentic Christianity:  How Lutheran Theology Speaks to a Postmodern World. He is also working on his Ph.D., in which he is studying the religious implications of our new technology.  Out of that work he has published Redeeming Technology: A Christian Approach to Healthy Digital Habits.

In his Religion & Liberty article, Trevor begins with a vivid reflection on the physicality of the risen Christ and our human physicality.  He then shows how all of the major Christian traditions–Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran, Calvinist–agree that worship addresses the senses and is to be embodied.

He makes a useful distinction between “technology” and “media,” drawing on that great media scholar Martin Luther:

While technology and media are often conflated, they are not identical or interchangeable. Technology can be understood as tools or instruments. (To be certain, this is not an exhaustive understanding of technology.) Media, on the other hand, are often understood as conduits for communication. Media are that which convey ideas, images, or information. For example, Martin Luther in his lectures on Isaiah recognized the ways in which worship and media intersect: “As the God who is worshiped, God is clothed in the earthly media of the Word, of Baptism, and of the Lord’s Supper, wherein he reveals himself.” Although it may often go unnoticed, corporate worship—both past and present—relies heavily on media.

Trevor also works with the thought of the pioneering media scholarship of Marshall McLuhan, who said that media is an extension of the body and its senses.  He applies this to worship:

Media are conduits for communication that influence not only the message itself but also the recipients of the message. For example, livestream video of in-person worship extends the sight and sounds of the sanctuary, but not the taste, touch, and smell of the worship service. Those viewing the livestream worship see and hear the sanctuary while the rest of their senses are located elsewhere. Their eyes and ears are extended into the worship space while their nose, tongue, and other body parts are not. Digital media allows part of you—but not all of you—to be somewhere far from the rest of your body.

Digital media’s ability to extend some of our senses results in a fragmented bodily experience, hence a disintegration of the senses. Part of you may be somewhere, but not all of you. The opposite of this is common sense (sensus communis), wherein there is communion and harmony of the bodily senses. Common sense occurs when all your senses—sight, hearing, taste, touch, smell—are gathered together in a harmonious and singular experience.

In-person worship is a common sense experience: You see the sanctuary, stained glass, cross or crucifix, and candles. You smell the incense. You taste the bread and wine of the Lord’s Supper. You touch the pews and hymnals and embrace others. You hear the Word proclaimed, crying babies, and the din of the worshiping space. In-person worship is the communion of senses wherein taste, touch, smell, sight, and hearing coalesce in a common experience.

Metaverse worship, however, ruptures the communion of our senses. A VR headset transports everything to a virtual site of worship; eyes and ears and minds extend into the metaverse, while noses, mouths, hands, hearts, and guts remain elsewhere. The sense of touch is relegated to a couch or computer chair while smelling a house, coffee shop, or dormitory. Since the metaverse is a place devoid of tastes, VR worshippers taste whatever happens to be at the ready where they are worshiping: pancakes, coffee, or Doritos. Worshipping in the metaverse is devoid of common sense—you are here, you are there, you are everywhere. In short, you are nowhere.

Trevor is no Luddite.  He is not saying that watching and hearing a service online–which the majority of churches are now offering post-COVID– is necessarily wrong or ineffective.  The Word is efficacious, after all, and we can hear that Word through the online media.  He even concedes that different theologies can arrive at different practices.  “A tradition that values proclamation of the Word may see great possibility in online worship,” he says, “whereas one that gives priority to the Eucharist may see online worship as untenable.”

And, of course, watching and hearing an actual pastor conducting an actual service online before actual congregants is not the same as the completely virtual cartoon world of the metaverse.

His point is that the technology and the media that we use affects us. “Altering where and how we worship will alter our values and virtues, possibly encouraging a more solipsistic and individualistic approach not only to worship but to the Faith as a whole.”

I would add the observation that most religions work to free us from the “web of illusions.”  This is what Hinduism and Buddhism are built around, but the Bible too warns us against teachings based on illusions and false appearances (Isaiah 30:10, Col 2:23).  I am not aware of any religion that teaches us to live in illusions, much less to worship in an illusory space.  And when religious people try to do this, it will end up undermining their religion.

 

 

Illustration: The Revetar (Avatar) of the Bishop of London interacting with users, via The Church of Fools: Virtual Ritual and Material Faith. – Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Revetar-Avatar-of-the-Bishop-of-London-interacting-with-users-Image-courtesy-of_fig8_33436025 [accessed 24 Oct, 2022]

2022-10-24T08:36:21-04:00

When my wife and I first attended a Lutheran service, we were impressed with how formal it was, a far cry from what we were used to in the mainline Protestant denominations we grew up in and in the evangelical congregations we attended in college.  So we came back next week, only to find both the congregation and the pastor chanting.  We thought we had been transported back to the Middle Ages.

It turns out, that first service we attended was the one informal service that was held on months with five Sundays.  We came to learn that when Lutherans try to be informal–or, more recently, contemporary–they are still more formal and less contemporary than just about anyone else.  But the definitive Lutheran worship, which we learned to treasure, is to be found in what they call the “Divine Service,” which is called that because in it, Lutherans believe, God serves us.

Patheos has asked its writers to respond to some of the most frequent questions about the various religious traditions that they receive.  What most puzzles Patheos readers about Lutheranism is its worship.  They wonder what they need to know in order to understand what is going on.  Specifically, as the Patheos editors summarize the inquiries, “What should I keep in mind when visiting a Lutheran church?”  So it falls to me to try to explain.

What follows is an account of the traditional Divine Service, which can be dressed up or down, made more elaborate or more simple.  Even contemporary Lutheran services will tend to have the same structure and most of the same elements–from the confession and absolution to the Law & Gospel sermons–so that what I describe here, except for what I say about music, will mostly still apply.

(1)  The Liturgy Consists Mostly of Words from Scripture

The first reaction of many visitors is, “This is Catholic!”  Or, “This is too Catholic!”  Yes, the liturgy goes way back through church history and is similar to that of Roman Catholics, the Orthodox, and, among Protestants, Anglicans, whose Book of Common Prayer was greatly influenced by Lutheranism.

But the Lutheran liturgy also shows forth the principles of the Reformation.  Luther wanted to reform the church, not start a new one.  Later Protestants would want to start, more or less, from scratch, but the work of “reforming” means changing what is problematic, but leaving what is good.  For Luther, everything that pointed away from Christ and the Gospel should be eliminated, but what does point to Christ and the Gospel should be retained.

So the Lutheran liturgy leaves out elements in the Catholic mass such as praying for the dead and invoking the saints.  But it retains the overall structure and the ancient liturgical set-pieces, such as the Kyrie (“Lord have mercy. . .”) and the Agnus Dei (“Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world”).  In fact, those set pieces and nearly all of the responses of the congregation are taken straight from the Bible.  When someone objects to our liturgy, I ask, “Which words of God do you think we shouldn’t say?”

The sanctuary will also demonstrate the Reformation principle of retaining elements that point to Christ.  There will typically be quite a bit of art in the sanctuary.  Lots of crosses.  That will include pictures of Jesus and other representational art.  This is not idolatry, since that means worshiping false gods and Jesus is the true God, who came as a visible, tangible human being discernible by the senses (1 John 1:1).  Lots of crucifixes, depicting Jesus on the cross.  Some Christians say that one should only use empty crosses because Jesus isn’t on the cross any more–He rose!  Well, Lutherans certainly believe in His Resurrection (and also have empty crosses), but we need to keep a constant focus on “Christ crucified”  (1 Corinthians 2:1 and 2 Corinthians 1:2), upon which which our salvation is based and which Lutherans apply in a host of ways in their “theology of the Cross.”

(2)  Chanting Lets Us Sing Prose, Such as Texts from Scripture

The Divine Service is mostly chanted by both the pastor and the congregation.  This may be the aspect that seems the most “Catholic” or “Medieval” or just unusual to visitors.  But chanting, with its flexible meter and flowing melodic line, is simply the way that a person can sing prose.

Most of our songs today–whether hymns or raps–are metrical, with fixed patterns of rhythm and rhyme.  That is to say, they put music to poems.  But it is also possible to sing any sequence of words.  That requires music that flows along with the pattern of speech.  This is what chanting is.

Some of my friends who are Reformed (a term Lutherans never use for themselves), belong to Psalms-only congregations.  Using their principle that Christians may only do what the Bible specifies (while Lutherans believe they are free to do whatever the Bible does not forbid), they do not sing hymns, just Psalms.  But what they sing are really metrical paraphrases of the Psalms, forced onto the Procrustean bed of meter and rhyme.  But we Lutherans sing the Psalms right out of the Bible by chanting them.

Lutherans do sing hymns that will be familiar to most visitors, including some of those metrical Psalms, drawing on the vast and varied musical heritage of the church universal.  Perhaps stranger to some visitors’ ears are the hymns from the Lutheran tradition, particularly those from the 16th and 17th century, often in the baroque style of vivid imagery and achingly beautiful, but complex, music.

(3)  The Pastor Will Forgive Your Sins

What most puts off quite a few visitors is at the beginning of the service when the members of the congregation confess their sins, first reflecting silently and then reading a prayer of repentance, after which the pastor says this or something like it:

Almighty God in His mercy has given His Son to die for you and for His sake forgives you all your sins. As a called and ordained servant of the Word I announce the grace of God to all of you, and in the stead and by the command of my Lord Jesus Christ, I forgive you all your sins in the name of the Father and of the + Son and of the Holy Spirit.

I forgive you?” some say. “The pastor can’t forgive sins!  Only Jesus can do that!”  Well, right, only Jesus can forgive sins.  But Lutherans believe that God works through human beings.  That is the doctrine of vocation.  Notice the wording:  “As a called and ordained servant of the Word.”  “Called” refers to vocation, which is simply the Latinate word for “calling.”  God forgives sins through pastors, just as He gives us our daily bread through farmers and creates new life through mothers and fathers.  The basis of the pastor’s forgiveness, also known as “absolution,” is “the grace of God to all of you” and the fact that He “has given His Son to die for you.”   (Lutherans reject the Reformed doctrine of Limited Atonement, so all have access to this grace and atonement.)

And the Scriptural warrant for human beings forgiving sins is pretty explicit.  After His resurrection, Jesus breathes on His disciples, saying,“Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld” (John 20:22-23).

(4)  You Will Hear a Law and Gospel Sermon

The sermon may also be different from what you are used to.  There will be no politics, no pop psychology, no Biblical principles for successful living.  (Lutheranism, with its theology of cross-bearing, is pretty much the opposite of the Prosperity Gospel.)  The sermon will be based on one or more of the three Bible readings (an Old Testament, Epistle, and Gospel reading as determined by the Lectionary, a plan for Scripture reading tied to the church year), but it will be handled in terms of the distinct Lutheran hermeneutic and preaching paradigm of Law and Gospel.

The moral law in the Scripture will be proclaimed, but in a way that precludes self-righteousness.  Listeners will be persuaded that they do not, in fact, obey God’s Law, with its multiple ramifications, and that they are in sore need of repentance.  Whereupon the sermon will move to a proclamation of the Gospel, namely, that Christ has fulfilled this law on our behalf and has paid the penalty that we deserve for breaking it with His atoning death and resurrection. When we know that we are sinners and cannot save ourselves and believe that Jesus has died for us and offers us new life, we have saving faith, which, in turn, bears the fruit of love for our neighbors.

This is not “cheap grace” the pastor is teaching.  A skillful preacher can really make you feel guilty, which tempers our bad behavior.  And, by preaching the Gospel, he really make you feel free.  Lutherans speak of three uses of the Law:  the first, the civil use, is to restrain our external sinful proclivities; the second, the theological use, is to convict us of sin and drive us to the Gospel; and the third, the didactic use, is to teach Christians how to live in order to please God, which, motivated by gratitude, they now desire to do.

You will find no altar call in a Lutheran sermon.  Coming to faith is not a one-time decision.  Rather, the pattern of repentance and faith is repeated throughout the Christian’s life, and is enacted throughout the Divine Service.  The point at which you objectively became a Christian is when you were Baptized, even as an infant, a purely passive experience in which God called you by name and gave you the gift of the Holy Spirit.  But, just as that infant must be fed, be taught, and grow, the baptized Christian must be fed and taught and grow by means of the Word and Sacraments.  Otherwise, faith will die.

(5)  You Must be Catechized Before You Go Up for Communion.

If you are a visitor to a Lutheran church, observe what is happening and, if you want, go up for a blessing.  (Bow and cross your arms when the pastor comes your way.)  But if you are not a Lutheran and if the pastor doesn’t know you, you should refrain from taking the consecrated bread and wine.  The liberal Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) would probably let you, but the more conservative Lutheran Church  Missouri Synod, Wisconsin Evangelical Synod, the Evangelical Lutheran Synod, and smaller and independent church bodies practice “closed communion.”  Sometimes this is phrased as “close” communion, meaning that those who commune together should be close to each other as in being part of the same congregation or church body, but it means the same, that the altar is “closed” to those who have not been catechized and confirmed in the host church, its denomination, or a denomination with which it is in formal fellowship.

Please, please, do not be insulted, as many visitors are.  Lutherans are not denying that you are a Christian.  Anyone, of any denomination or non-denomination, who confesses faith in Christ is considered to be a Christian, and Lutherans do accept all Baptisms, of whatever mode or at whatever age.  It’s just that Lutherans hold to the Biblical teaching that no one should receive the Lord’s Supper without examining oneself and without “discerning the body” (1 Corinthians 11:28-29).

“Discerning the body,” of course, means different things to different theologies. Catholics believe the bread is transubstantiated into the Body of Christ and so is no longer bread; Calvinists believe in a spiritual presence that depends on the faith of the person receiving it; most Protestants, again, hold it be merely symbolic.  But Lutherans believe that the body and blood of Christ are really present in, with, and under the bread and wine.  More than that, Christ gives His body and His blood in these physical elements “for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28).  Evangelicals speak of “receiving Christ” at their conversion.  Lutherans believe they “receive Christ” every time they take Holy Communion.

Some say that “discerning the body” refers not to the bread and wine of Holy Communion, but to the Body of Christ that is the Church.  Well, fine, and maybe it refers to both, since the two senses are intimately connected.  But that too is an argument for “closed” or “close” communion, since it requires awareness of those with whom you are communing.

Catholics and the Orthodox also practice closed communion, in line with their similarly high view of the Sacrament.  I have had occasions—weddings and funerals—to attend a Catholic mass, but it never bothered me that I couldn’t take communion. I didn’t want to. If I presented myself for communion, I would be participating with a church body that I don’t belong to and that I don’t agree with.  This is also why most Lutherans won’t commune at other churches that practice “open” communion.  It’s a matter of respecting differences.  And this respect can co-exist with a spirit of welcome and good-will.

So, please, visitors, know that you are welcome to a Lutheran service and don’t let our quirks be an obstacle.  I think you will appreciate, as my wife and I did, the sense of transcendence and holiness that we found there.

If you would like to learn more about Lutheranism, read the book that I wrote on that subject, The Spirituality of the Cross:  The Way of the First Evangelicals; talk to a pastor; and visit the Divine Service.

 

 

Photo:  Divine Service by adcarlson2 via Lutheran Wikia

 

2022-10-16T20:38:05-04:00

Jonathan Aigner, my fellow Patheos blogger at Ponder Anew, points out that some 4 billion people watched the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.  That comes to 63% of the entire world.  And, judging from the social media reaction, viewers in our part of the world were transfixed.

He wrote a post entitled If You Watched the Queen’s Funeral, Try Going to Church for Yourself.  He says,

I noticed more than a few on social media talking about the elegance of the liturgy, the sublime music, and the beauty in the solemnity of the occasion.

If that’s you, try going to church this weekend.

I don’t mean just any church.

Go to one of those liturgical churches. They aren’t as common as they used to be, but they’re still around. While the atmosphere of Westminster Abbey is hard to replicate, you might be surprised how close churches within driving distance of you can come.

Those may be hard to find, he admits, and even some that used to be liturgical may have switched to something more modern and trendy in a mostly futile attempt to appeal to the contemporary culture.  But they exist.  Aigner explains,

Liturgical worship rejects the pervasive idea that casual demeanor and extemporaneous speech are more sincere and authentic. Christians throughout history have known better. . . .

So, if you were intrigued by worship designed to reflect the beauty of holiness, I’d encourage you to go look for it in your own area. Look for a church that is intentionally NOT trendy, modern or contemporary. Go look for the “otherness,” a place where there is no attempt to domesticate the transcendence of God into cultural relevance.

Read the entire post, which goes into more detail about the value of liturgical worship.

I’ve noticed that some young adults have never experienced anything but contemporary worship, so that when they experience the traditional worship of their tradition, or especially liturgical worship, it seems fresh, new, and refreshingly “different.”

In terms of what we have been discussing, if you resist “progress” but do not want to go as far back in the past as animism, or if the reason you are “spiritual but not religious” is that the religions you have experience with are not very spiritual. . .try Christian spirituality.  There is more to it than liturgy, but that will give you a taste of it.

You can find the historic liturgy in Catholic, Orthodox, Episcopal, Anglican, and Lutheran churches.  I recommend the latter, if you can find a congregation of the Missouri Synod, Wisconsin Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Synod, one of the small confessional church bodies, or, beyond the United States, a member of the International Lutheran Council, on the grounds that good worship needs good theology.

 

Photo:  Westminster Abbey by geo pixel, CC BY 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

 

Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives