Lance Armstrong and Evidence

Lance Armstrong has been condemned without a trial so far as I can see. Perhaps I’m wrong but all I’ve seen in the reports is hearsay accusations — by teammates no less — against Armstrong without one shred of physical evidence that he cheated. (Do I suspect he did? How can one not with all these reports, including the stripping of his medals and loss of endorsements?)

I remember the Barry Bonds stuff, but his body changes were so dramatic it was hard not to suspect him. The same can be said of others.

But I ask: Where’s the evidence? Why is this guy being judged without our hearing of the specific evidence that his body is contaminated with evidence of doping? Why are we not hearing about the evidence for doping?

Help me, what am I missing?