Beyond the Tiny Gospel

Beyond the Tiny Gospel January 20, 2017

Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 9.10.12 AMBy John Frye

Beyond the Tiny Gospel

What if I said to you that the story of the movie The Sound of Music was about guitars? Would you disagree? What if I said the story of the movie Ben Hur is about chariot wheels? What if I said the story about the movie Titanic is about the north Atlantic ocean? You would think I was a little (or maybe hugely) short-sighted about these magnificent films. Why reduce the story of the von Trapp family to the topic of guitars? Are there, in fact, guitars in The Sound of Music? Is not the scene with Captain Georg von Trapp (Christopher Plummer) entering the room with a guitar singing a major turning point in the story? What about those Ben Hur chariot wheels? Aren’t those very wheels the source of incredible tension in the (1959 film) chariot race scene? Where did the Titanic sink? I rest my case. But I know you’re not convinced. Why? Because each of “my” views is a horrible reduction of those tremendous, expansive stories.

How you feel about my reductions of great stories is, I think, how Jesus and Paul would react to the contemporary reductions of the New Testament Gospel. The gospel is very simple in the minds of most people. A friend reported to me recently the gospel is obvious; it’s the pathway to salvation. Really? Did early Christians and Christians though church history die for a plan of salvation? Here is what other friends suggested the gospel is: John 3:16. This mind you even though this singular verse is in, wait for it, the GOSPEL of John! Another said “forgiveness of sins.” Is that the gospel or a wonderful benefit of the gospel? One suggested “an eternal home in heaven.” Again, that is a popular expression of the gospel—going to heaven when you die. Oh my. There is so much bad theology and reductionism in that view of the gospel. One person offered that the gospel is “God’s power to save.” I believe that idea is a reflection of Romans 1:16, but is that the gospel itself or the energy that the gospel has? What if Romans 1:1-5 is Paul’s succinct summary of the gospel and the rest of Romans unpacks its dimensions, implications and benefits?

I did a Google search of the question “What is the gospel?” In less than a second, I got 88,300,000 results! Eighty-eight million plus. You would think that on something as basic as the New Testament gospel there would be overwhelming unity. Well, think again. What startled me the most as I worked my way through many of the Google results was the observation that many local churches believe that it is their duty to define their “take” on the gospel. As if the gospel in Lubbock, TX has to be nuanced vis-à-vis the gospel of Charleston, SC or Kenosha, WI and Portland, OR. (No, I am not impugning contextualization.)

I’ve been reading Scot McKnight’s The King Jesus Gospel and N. T. Wright’s Simply Good News. As a pastor I recall the radical exposé of the reduced Western gospel by Dallas Willard in his book The Divine Conspiracy. Dallas coined the phrase “the barcode gospel.” In this gospel, Willard contends, the only thing any Christian really needs from Jesus is “a little blood for their sins.” That’s it. Even more telling about the reduced gospel, as McKnight observes, many Christians cannot imagine why we need to know anything about Jesus as Israel’s Messiah. We all know “Christ” is simply Jesus’s last name. What’s “Messiah” got to do with the gospel?

According to Paul’s own definition (description) of the New Testament gospel in 1 Corinthians 15, the gospel is the Story of Jesus the Christ bringing to completion and expanding the Story of Israel. Tom Wright contends that the more Jewish the gospel is, the more universal its impact on the dark powers resisting new creation. Even more, YHWH, in the resurrected Jesus of Nazareth, now reigns a King over all other powers in the universe. This is the good news! “Our God reigns!” This news must now more than ever be announced. It is the only news that saves this fractured universe by producing new creation.

The grand story of the New Testament gospel in the USA, with its deep roots in the Old Testament, has been reduced, like making guitars the story of The Sound of Music.

"We should simply turn back to the Bible and believe in the God that so ..."

Gotta Have Faith, But What is ..."
"Same. Also some glitches in links to FB comments."

Blog Moving to Christianity Today
"The "sign up for updates" feature advertised in this post does not seem to be ..."

Blog Moving to Christianity Today
"Thanks Tim.I was probably searching before it was up."

Blog Moving to Christianity Today

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Steve Crosby

    From a long-time teacher: brilliant hook/analogy/connection! Instantly and memorably makes a powerful point. Kudos!

  • Steve

    “As if the gospel in Lubbock, TX has to be nuanced …” Well…since I’ve lived in Lubbock, I’ve pretty well come to the conclusion that a nuanced gospel on the west plains is not necessarily a bad thing…just sayin’… 🙂

  • Tucker

    Great post, John! Dare I say one of the best ever. Please keep hammering on this. Approach this topic from various angles. Preach it, brother. It’s so obvious from Scripture, but people just don’t get it.

  • Jeff Y

    John, very useful analogies; I enjoyed those and agree with the point. What I think would be beneficial is a follow-up post that articulates positively and in more detail your view the full picture of the gospel. I also think Rom. 1:1-5 is a better picture than “getting saved / going to heaven.” That said, I don’t think many who reduce the gospel to John 3:16 would disagree that Rom. 1:1-5 is also a picture of the gospel or that it flows out of the story of Israel. I suspect many would say, “yes, certainly, but where’s the ‘so what’ of that distinction?” Or, put another way, “Where’s the boots on the ground impact?” I think there is such but would enjoy hearing your articulation.

    I think at least a few keys to such involve the nature of Christ’s work, missional distinctions, and eschatological implications (which also circle back to mission and Christ’s work).

  • John W. Frye

    Wow, Steve. Thank you. I am encouraged by your affirmation.

  • John W. Frye

    I don’t mind a “nuanced gospel,” as long as it isn’t a different gospel from the one in 1 Cor. 15:1-8. 🙂

  • John W. Frye

    Tucker, thank you for such an enthusiastic comment. I, along with many, are “hammering on this” because the health of the church and the hope of the world depends on it. Blessings!

  • John W. Frye

    That is the challenge for all us, Jeff, that is, what is the “so what?” I think the first result of a robust gospel is a robust church. I do not think the evangelical church in the USA is a “robust” church.

  • This is excellent, John. Spot-on analogies.

    For those wanting to read more, in addition to the books John mentioned above, Scot’s “Kingdom Conspiracy” and N.T. Wright’s “How God Became King” are also enlightening.

  • Jeff Y

    Totally agree on the non-robust nature of the Evangelical church and its ‘evacuation theology’ (Rob Bell). I’m simply noting that hat’s what the Evangelical response would be without a more detailed elucidation and description of the more complete picture of the gospel with application.

    I think part of it starts with understanding the conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees was not about legalism but about the nature and of the kingdom of God. I also think Phil. 2:5-11 is a central point to what true salvation is and where it is found in participation in a radically downwardly mobile, cruciform living. Weakness.