Dems for Life Calls on Hillary to Open Up Democratic Party to Pro Life People

Dems for Life Calls on Hillary to Open Up Democratic Party to Pro Life People May 23, 2015
Photo Source: Wikimedia, by Voice of America. Public Domain.
Photo Source: Wikimedia, by Voice of America. Public Domain.

I know what you’re going to say, so let me say it for you.

Fat chance.

Democrats for Life of America has issued a press release calling for Hillary Clinton to bring back the big tent and open up the Democratic Party to pro life people.

Now, for the response I know many of your are thinking: Fat Chance.

I am aware, in ways that most of the rest of your can only guess at, just how entrenched the pro abortion position is in the upper levels of the Democratic Party. I also am aware, again as I think most of you are not, that this does not represent the thinking of many Democrats.

The Rs and the Ds are alike in many ways. One of the most significant is that the upper reaches of both parties are far removed from the rank and file. In fact, the upper reaches of both the R and the D view the rank and file as rubes to be manipulated and managed.

So, if the upper reaches of the Democratic Party are so entrenched in abortion, is it really a “fat chance” deal to try to change it?


Here’s why.

Somebody changed it in the first place.

The Democratic Party was pro life back in the 70s and early 80s. Again, I know this as most of you don’t. I have what you might call insider knowledge of how these deals came down and how we got where we are. I know because I helped create this monster.

Now, back to Democrats for Life’s call for Hillary Clinton to open up the big tent. I think their target is well chosen. Secretary Clinton is pro choice, no doubt about that. I don’t expect her to change on that, although I have to tell you, I pray for it. But she’s not a Christian-hater like President Obama appears to be. She isn’t a bigot.

Unlike President Obama, who has attacked religious freedom, President Clinton supported and signed laws guaranteeing the free exercise of religion. Both Clintons have been consistent respecters of religious freedom in their public behavior. This isn’t rhetoric. They have a track record.

Of all the Democratic candidates, I think Hillary Clinton is the best bet for opening up the party and allowing Democrats to think and let think once again.

Do not take this post an endorsement for Hillary Clinton. I will not endorse any candidate in the upcoming race. I will not make public statements about how I’m going to vote. I don’t vote straight party. I will say that much, but that is all.

My purpose in writing Public Catholic is not to promote more of the political heresy. It is to get Christians to think past the political heresy and follow Christ. Period.

That means I will step on toes from time to time. When I say that Hillary Clinton — who is the D that the Rs love most to hate — is the best bet for religious freedom within the Democratic party, that’s an honest assessment.

Will it work?

From my experience, calling people to follow their better angels never works in the short term. It is not — ever — a quick fix. But if you’ve got the guts and the persistence to keep doing it, you will find that it always works in the long run.

Not with everybody. There will always be people who cling to their dark side. But people respond to higher calls with incredible courage and power if they come to trust the caller.

I support this call to change the party. I have always supported it, and I imagine that I always will. If we can convert the Democratic Party, we can win this fight for life. If we do not convert the Democratic Party, the fight will never end.

It’s as simple as that.

Here’s the full press release from Democrats for Life of America.


(202) 220-3066

May 7, 2015

WASHINGTON, DC – – Democrats For Life of Americais urging presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to open the Big Tent of the Democratic Party to pro-life voters and to support neutrality on the issue of abortion in the Democratic Party Platform. The current platform not only supports abortion, but also supports taxpayer funding of abortion.

“Secretary Clinton once recognized that people ‘have deeply held differences of opinion about the issue of abortion, and she said she respected ‘those who believe that there are no circumstances under which any abortion should ever be available.’  We are asking candidate Clinton to open that door and issue in a new era of respect and inclusion for Democrats who hold these views,” said Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats For Life of America.  “For the good of the party, we must re-open the big tent to include Democrats who support life from conception to natural death.”

In 1978, the Democratic Party held a 292-seat majority in the U.S. House, which included 125 pro-life Democrats.  Increased partisanship over the pro-life issue—including the rejection of pro-life candidates within the Democratic Party—caused many of the pro-life Democratic districts to elect Republican candidates.  In fact, the number of pro-choice Democrats in the House has essentially remained around 167.  It is the number of pro-life Democrats that decreased from 125 to only a handful, leaving Democrats overall with only 188 members.

“Since the 1992 shunning of pro-life Democratic Governor Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, the Democratic Party has alienated its pro-life base.  Polls consistently show that about one-third of Democrats—that’s 21 million Democrats—oppose abortion,” said Day.  “If we are going to increase our base to win back the majority and keep the White House, our Democratic nominee must recognize the contributions of pro-life Democrats within our party and the diverse position of Democrats on the issue of abortion.”

That diversity of opinion is as follows:

  • 61% of Democrats support parental consent for minors seeking abortion (Gallup, 2011);
  • 60% of Democrats support a 24-hour waiting period for women seeking abortion (Gallup, 2011);
  • 84% of Democrats support informed consent (Gallup, 2011);
  • 49% of Democrats support an ultrasound requirement (Gallup, 2011);
  • 59% of Democrats support a ban on partial-birth abortions (Gallup, 2011).

“We are asking Secretary Clinton and any other Democratic presidential hopeful to embrace a platform that fully represents all Democrats, not just those who support abortion,” said Day.  “In the 2008 election, about one-quarter of Obama’s supporters self-identified as pro-life.  These numbers are not trivial; they exceed many prominent and well-represented constituencies in the party.  Electoral success for the party nationwide will depend on the enthusiasm of all Democrats, including pro-life Democrats.”



Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

12 responses to “Dems for Life Calls on Hillary to Open Up Democratic Party to Pro Life People”

  1. Thank you, Rebecca, for your thorough assessment of so many political issues. I so often have to stop and reevaluate my positions. I ask myself questions such as: Where did this attitude come from? Is this something I “know” or something I have researched thoroughly before deciding? Is there truth in my opinion? Is there truth in another’s opinion? In other words, it opens up dialogue within myself and with others.

  2. I haven’t been following politics for long so my perspective is still somewhat of an outsider looking in. Learning that so many Democrats are pro-life is one of those things that caught me by surprise, but in retrospect shouldn’t have been surprising at all. After all, if you really care about the issue of abortion instead of just paying lip service to it, then the most logical course of action would be to support economic policies and programs that benefit struggling families.

    Its one of the things that drew me to your blog in the first place.

    Now, on the issue of abortion itself, pro-choice proponents seek to keep abortion legal and accessible, while pro-life proponents want to make abortion illegal and inaccessible. Those are diametrically opposed views. There is no way either side is going to compromise on those issues.

    However, they do (or should) agree on the following: trying to make abortion unnecessary.

    I’m not saying to stop fighting against abortion altogether; even if I believe the endgame of making abortion illegal is self-defeating, I think at the very least we need a voice on the other side of the abortion debate to ensure it doesn’t become the new default position.

    But aren’t you the one that said that politics is the art of the possible? So why not bring up and support proposals that directly affect abortion rates that both camps should in principle agree to? We already know the places where they don’t agree, its high time they started working on the places they do.

    On that note, you should really stop conflating religious affiliation with stances on abortion. You should google “secular pro life” sometime.

  3. I no longer believe that it is possible for the United States of America to be pro-life.
    Democrats and Republicans have proven to me that our entire economy is based on killing off the next generation. May God have mercy on our souls.

  4. Rebecca, I know you are in the middle of this issue with the Democratic Party. I also know some relatively pro-life demos, although most just say that’s only one issue. Do you really think that the people who stopped the human trafficking bill have any potential to be even neutral?

  5. Not those people, no. We have to change the faces in the party. That’s a tall order, but if we want to change our culture, we have to start chipping away at it. The Ds were once pro life. The pro choice people changed them. This was not easy for them to accomplish. We change them back, if we have the same level of commitment.

  6. I hope you can change the Democratic Party to the pro-life side. I say that with all my heart and no partisan angle. I would love for this issue to just go away. Let’s argue over economic approaches and bless all the babies, born or yet to be born, of the nation.

  7. Theodore, not only is that wrong, it’s repulsive. Even most Democrats who support abortion do it out of a misguided notion.

  8. Yes, but there is no denying that the misguided notion that poverty is genetic and must be wiped out by low cost abortion, does have real monetary benefits in the US Economy. Those of us who survived the genocide, are getting those benefits.