menu

Sin 1: Sin? Really?

Sin 1: Sin? Really? October 14, 2021

 Sin blinds us to sin. Sin itself makes us think that there is no sin. Sin turns off the lights, so to speak, so that the truth about ourselves becomes invisible. What accompanies sin is secrecy, fog, darkness.

How does the dark darken? Sin, say critics of religion, is an idea invented by nefarious  clergy to keep the hoi poloi under control. Sin is an idea that frightens little children. By making us feel guilt-ridden and requiring us to bow and scrape before the priest in the confessional, this fake doctrine fills us with fear. When we otherwise good people are harangued in church with sin talk, we become self-effacing, self-deprecating, and self-destroying. All this is true. Right?

Atheists are not the only ones to bark complaints. Christians complain too. One Patheos columnist, Mathew Destefano, just can’t stand all this sin-talk. “Evangelicals focus so heavily on sin that they are living in fear. Their universe is one that would strike fear in the heart of anyone who affirms it. Perpetual hell. Eternal damnation. Everlasting torment. FEAR. FEAR. FEAR.” So, it’s time to simply jettison the idea of sin. Right?

Not quite. The Christian doctrine of sin reveals the secrets of our human condition like an x-ray camera reveals what’s under our skin. As an exercise in  public theology, let’s x-ray the dark shadows of daily human life. Let’s get real about our human predicament. Let’s try on for size four different views of sin, testing them to see which are more realistic than the others.

1. SIN DOES NOT EXIST

“Sin Does Not Exist: And Believing That It Does Is Ruining Us,” writes podcaster Richard Bellrock (Bellrock April 18 2019). Really? Quite the contrary, I contend. But, it’s complicated.

We’ve all heard of the 7 Deadly Sins.  The Vatican recently added an 8th: littering. We love to trivialize sins so that, like a pesky mosquito, a quick slap will make their sting go away. After all, the National Catholic Reporter observes: “Interestingly, pride, greed, lust, anger, gluttony, envy and sloth probably comprise the majority of motives found on television and in movies, and account for the background attitudes in nearly all of our advertising.”

But here, let’s get serious. Sin leads to evil, and evil leads to the destruction of what is. Got that straight? (Peters 1993)

Now, I would agree that evil does not exist. To exist means to stand out [exist = ek stasis] of non-being. To exist is to be something. To exist is to be this and not that.

But—and here’s the point–sin leads to evil, and evil is the aggressive power of nonbeing. Evil destroys what is. Sin leads to death, finally. Evil aggressively turns what is into what is no longer. To be realistic we must see sin as a force that destroys both the sinner and everything else.

In short, Christian public theology illuminates the universal human condition so that we can be realistic about ourselves. Confessing our sins testifies to the truth about who we are.

2. SIN IS IGNORANCE

Skeptic Paul Kurtz contends that the actual sin we should fear is ignorance combined with gullibility. Christians are so gullible they believe this nonsense about sin. “Gullibility and ignorance are the source of much nonsense in religion, ideology, morality, and politics” (Kurtz 1986, 62). Because religious people lack the power of reason, they are gullible to misleading rhetoric about sin. Really? No, of course not.

This reminds me of Socrates, who diagnosed the fundamental human disease: we are ignorant of the good. Once we find the true good through the power of reason, we will do the good, said Socrates. Therefore, the path to social salvation leads through education toward increased knowledge, wisdom, and virtue. In short, the human race could reason its way out of violence and destruction. (Adam and Eve painting by Karoly Patco)

One of the phenomena that neither Socrates nor Kurtz could account for is this: some of the smartest and most educated people in our society are the most selfish, narcissistic, and dangerous. They lead us into war; and people die. Increased knowledge leads to increased capacity to do evil. Reason and knowledge will not overcome evil.

3. SIN PRODUCES EVIL BY THE WILL

This debate over sin as ignorance led Saint Augustine to diagnose the fundamental human disease in terms of the will rather than the mind. If you or I are malevolent, then our malevolent will darkens our perception so that we are no longer able to see the light of truth or goodness. Sin blinds us to sin. Following Augustine, Ian Barbour observes, “”Sin is…a defect of the will, not of reason” (Barbour 2006, 364).

Under ordinary circumstances, our will is bound to serve the interests of the self. When the Holy Spirit empowers us by grace, we become liberated from the interests of the self and become capable of loving our neighbor for the sake of our neighbor. The simplest child among us who has not yet graduated from the school of higher reason can become quite capable of loving selflessly.

Feminists worry that this emphasis on selfless love risks impeding healthy self-development in young people, especially girls. It risks suppressing self-actualization (Plaskow 1975, 238). This is a healthy caution, I think. Even so, it may help theologically to recognize that the empowerment of the Holy Spirit strengthens and emboldens our self. When we shed pride or hubris, we do not deny the existence of the self. We self-actualize and self-define as a self who loves the neighbor.

4. SIN IS ALIENATION FROM GOD

“Sin as rebellion against creation necessarily entails sin against God,” declares process theologian Marjorie Suchocki (Suchocki 1994, 248). Because all of physical and spiritual reality is connected, any sin anywhere at any time has a destructive impact on the whole of God’s creation and, of course, on God as well.

We human beings—and the entire creation for that matter—are estranged from our Creator God. We are alienated from God largely because we do not trust God in faith. When sin is described by the theologian as pride or hubris, this suggests that we tacitly elevate our own self into the sphere of the divine. We treat our self as a god, at least indirectly. We sinners are the ones responsible for alienating ourselves from God. God is not responsible for this alienation.

Baylor’s Paul Sands tries to clarify some nuances between self-esteem and self-apotheosis. “Proper self-esteem is a barometer that rises and falls with the quality of one’s life. Good people should feel good about themselves; bad people should not.” Proper self-esteem is to be esteemed. What is to be feared is a self-apotheosis: a monstrous pride that reorganizes every nearby sycophant’s  life so that we all feed the wannabe god’s narcissistic and insatiable appetite for fawning, scraping, compliments, and devotion. While the false god evacuates us of our own integrity, the wannabe god himself or herself commands a fiefdom through megalomania, intolerance, and abuse. The self-declared human gods in our life confuse our loyalties and distort our charity.

Martin Luther distinguishes between belief in oneself as an idol and belief the true God. The prideful self who refuses to treat God as God becomes a danger. “The root and source of sin is unbelief and turning away from God, just as, on the other hand, the source and root of righteousness is faith” (Luther 1955-1986, 1:162). Really? Yes, really. “The essence of sin is disbelief, the state of estrangement from God,” adds Paul Tillich (Tillich 1955, 55). The true God gives us life through faith. The false gods–our proud friends–suck the life right out of us and swallow it for their own sakes.

“Like lost phones bereft of chargers and batteries,” observes Kaitlyn Dudley Curtin, “human persons cannot even recognize their desperation, much less take steps toward a remedy” (Curtin September 14 2021). Might a public theologian engaged in discourse clarification on the topic of sin shine enough light for us to find ourselves in a dark room?

Now, if our malevolent will distorts our reason so that we remain blind to how our pride alienates us from God, is our situation hopeless? No. Because God’s incarnation in Christ shines a carbon arc lamp into the world of darkness. According to Karl Barth, “Only when we know Jesus Christ do we really know that man is the man of sin, and what sin is, and what it means for man” (Barth 1936-1962, IV/i, 389).

Conclusion

It is actual sin—not the concept of sin—that distorts our vision. We human beings largely choose darkness over the bright light of truth. “The people living in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of the shadow of death a light has dawned” (Matthew 4:16). Any revelation of God is simultaneously a revelation of who we are.

I’ve been recommending that the public theologian use the doctrine of sin like a flashlight to illuminate the human situation. Is there such as thing as public theology? asks Roger Olson? Yes, indeed. And today’s public theologian can help us by illuminating everyday life with the rechargeable Maglite of the story of Jesus. The story of Jesus is like a brightly lit mirror. It tells us who we are.

The story of Jesus, in addition. announces grace for sinners. Grace “is not merely for the forgiveness of sin,” announces Patheos columnist Duncan Edward Pile, but also for “transformation and freedom.” The dialectic of sin  ‘n’ grace is what gives faithful living its excitement.

————–

Ted Peters is a pastor, professor, and author of both fiction and nonfiction. Visit: TedsTimelyTake.com.

Ted is emeritus professor of systematic theology and ethics at Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary and the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California. He co-edits the journal, Theology and Science at the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences. His fictional thrillers feature an inner-city pastor, Leona Foxx, who courageously challenges the structures of political domination buttressed by the latest in science and technology.

—————–

Works Cited

Barbour, Ian G. 2006. “Indeterminacy, Holism, and God’s Action.” In God’s Action in Nature’s World: Essays in Honor of Robert John Russell, 113-128. Aldershot UK: Ashgate.

Barth, Karl. 1936-1962. Church Dogmatics, 4 Volumes. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

Bellrock, S Rkichard. April 18 2019. Sin Does Not Exist: And Believing That It Does Is Ruining Us. Podcast, https://sunstone.org/sin-does-not-exist/: Sunstone.

Curtin, Kaitlyn Dudley. September 14 2021. Patron Saint of Operator Error: Augustine of Hippo. Podcast, https://www.patheos.com/articles/patron-saint-of-operator-error-augustine-of-hippo: Patheos.

Kurtz, Paul. 1986. Transcendental Temptation: A Critique of Religion and the Paranormal. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

Luther, Martin. 1955-1986. Luther’s Works, American Edition, 55 Volumes. St. Louis and Minneapolis: Concordia and Fortress.

Peters, Ted. 1993. Sin: Radical Evil in Soul and Society. Grand Rapids MI: Wm B Eerdmans.

Plaskow, Judith Ellen. 1975. Sex, Sin, and Grace: Women’s Experience and the Theologies of Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich. Lanham MD: University Press of America.

Suchocki, Marjorie. 1994. The Fall to Violence: Original Sin and Relational Theology. New York: Continuum.

Tillich, Paul. 1955. Biblical Religion and the Search for Ultimate Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

About Ted Peters
Ted Peters is a pastor, professor, and author of both fiction and nonfiction. Visit: TedsTimelyTake.com. You can read more about the author here.

Browse Our Archives