Paul, Blogging, and the Letter to the Galatians (Lawrence Garcia)

Paul, Blogging, and the Letter to the Galatians (Lawrence Garcia) August 19, 2011
Beginning of the Epistle to Galatians. Illuminated manuscript, in picture Paul gives his Epistle to a Galatian. Source: Wiki Commons

I have read the Apostle Paul long enough to know that if he were alive today he would be a serious blogger, seizing every opportunity to advance his Gospel, be it by letter or internet. The reason I make such an assertion in the first place is not just to tickle the imagination, but to ask ourselves a very serious question: “What is it that is informing Paul to make the stances he does on the various issues of the day? I ask this because crystallizing the underlying root for Paul’s arguments could be vital to assuring that we are formulating our own stances on today’s issues in conformity to God’s kingdom mission.

In order to identify the basis for Paul’s arguments we will examine the Letter to the Galatians, as this highly polemical letter is most analogous to that of present day blogs. It is when we examine Galatians closely that one point appears elemental for grasping the source for Paul’s discourse: that Paul’s writing is guided by his view that the crucifixion set in motion the end of the ages.

Notice that Paul frames his arguments in Galatians with two statements that deal with the cross (and presumably the resurrection) as initiating the new creation and so the end of the old era, what some scholars call the “already-not-yet”:

Galatians 1:4 (ESV) “[The Lord Jesus Christ] who gave himself for our sins to deliver us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father.”

Galatians 6:15, “For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation.”

Jesus’ death here has initiated an end-time exodus with cosmic ramifications. All of our old presuppositions and values must pass muster with the cosmic-shifting cross. For Paul, the way humans had previously categorized themselves were now no longer valid, this is seen as a central conclusion in the letter:

Galatians 3:28,There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Thus, the Jewish effort to circumcise Gentile Christians in Galatia, leading to divisions in the church, was actually for Paul a futile attempt at turning back the hands of time to a pre-cross era. Now I’m sure that most of my readers are not advocating for racial segregation, slavery, or patriarchy, but we often fail to recognize the ways we can re-categorize that function today much like circumcision did in Paul’s day. We demarcate based on Conservative or Liberal, Reformed or New Perspective, Evangelical or Emergent, and this can have a deep effect on whether we sit together at the same table as fellow covenant members in Christ. Thus, it is vital that we allow Paul’s exhortations from within his end-time positioning to help us pin-point ourselves within a post-cross era where our own designations likewise “amount to nothing”. This may mean that our own precious categories are no longer valid (at least momentarily set aside) in a pursuit of ecclesial unity. Like Paul, in light of the crucifixion we must do away with human categories that are a root for division in God’s end-time story and perhaps begin blogging within a conceptual framework as those “in Christ”.

The point above is crucial for actualizing ecclesial unity that is supposed to characterize God’s end-time people. I often am dismayed at the rising polemic towards evangelicals, many concerns of which I am likewise deeply and wholly sympathetic, but appear to be generating a sort of reverse circumcision. Must Evangelicals now become like us? Or should we hear Paul again:

Galatians 4:12 “Brothers, I entreat you, become as I am, for I also have become as you are. You did me no wrong.”

As those who live, move, and have their being in the resurrection era, all seemingly opposing parties should be aiming at becoming like each other! Of course, I have neither the time nor space to develop how this would work out in every situation, but I sense that embracing a disposition of sensitivity and openness that will give an open ear to other’s arguments, and even be shaped by them, is a good starting point.

I am painfully aware that I have merely scratched the surface, but learning to deliberate from within a Pauline historical framework which is both new creational, in relation to earthly ways of sorting each other out, and unification driven, in measuring the truthfulness of our statements, will prove essential to ensuring that the results achieved by our blogging will be useful for the kingdom. Of course, we must continue to dialogue, even disagreeing—remembering that “iron sharpens iron”. But this should never be cause for division. After all, Paul’s sometimes weighty theological arguments—“Hard to understand” even by those in his own day—were always aimed at making sure those of differing back grounds, status, gender, and race would sit down together and share food and drink. Will our blogging pursue the same?


A big thanks to my friend, Lawrence Garcia, for this article!

"So, in looking for an answer to prayer, I just read a bunch of BS ..."

If God Knows The Future, Why ..."
"If you're going to use a big word like "sacrosanct" at least spell it correctly ..."

When Violence Hits Home: “sparing the ..."
""BEWARE OF THE SCRIBES " comes to mind, where clearly "rapture" was a teaching device ..."

Why the Rapture isn’t Biblical… And ..."
"I assume it is to indicate that the name has two syllables as the 'au' ..."

Name Change Myth: Saul Never Became ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • YES! You really got this thing looking sharp, Larry. I particularly like the “post-cross” designator and the last excerpt from Galatians about becoming more like each other. I’ve been learning how much I have to learn from my Calvinist brothers and sisters for instance. Thank you very much for this wisdom.

  • Evelyn

    Here here! (as we say in the UK) and I add as big a round of applause as I can muster. Thank you for a timely and well-made case for unity.

    • Evelyn

      Sorry, can’t work out how to edit. Obviously meant to write “hear hear”!

  • Anonymous

     But this just is not the situation as a few from the Luxurious outlet stores are celebrity endorsed and are for that cause favored by larger communities Spyder Ski. The clear ground for this shift are going to be the lack of sufficient space in the prime retailers to keep them Replica Prada . You are capable to fully maintain far from the additional cost that originates from finding Luxurious products from designer shops by buying inside the Luxurious factory outlet store Replica Gucci . you will see a proportion Replica Louis Vuitton . it requires great craftsmanship to embellish styles and additional capabilities into leather Designer Bags . Hermes Handbags . The goods over you’ll be able to locate unique when it comes to excellent excellent Burberry Outlet . A visit for your official Luxurious Handbag internet site will acquaint you with the bag collection on provide you for your 12 months Burberry Coat . Luxurious cambridge hobo handbags is usually bought in numerous techniques Chanel Online . leather Juicy Handbags . In contrast with each other using the traditional GG pattern from Luxury and Monogram from Luxurious Prada Handbags . coats Coach Handbags . The prime purpose is the truth that individual can conserve a whole lot of time and travailing cost Gucci Handbags . if a consumer wishes to see a pink in their bag Louis Vuitton Purses.