Jacob Arminius– Theologian of Grace Part Five

BEN: Would it be correct to say that Arminius rejects Calvin’s strong distinction between the secret decrees and will of God and the revealed will of God, which allowed for the possibility that God’s revealed will might appear to contradict his secret or hidden will (e.g. it might appear from Scripture that God desires for none to perish and all to be saved, but in fact in his secret will and decrees God predetermined some to be reprobated)? In other words, because of Arminius’ belief in the ‘sim … [Read more...]

The Longest Basketball Shot Ever!– Steph Curry Your on Notice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9SF2YIKRY8 … [Read more...]

Rediscovering King Jesus (not King George) on the 4th


REDISCOVERING KING JESUS--- PHILIP JENKINSThis year marks a remarkable anniversary in the study of Christian history. Seventy years ago, in late 1945, some Egyptian peasants discovered a trove of early Christian texts including several alternative gospels, all probably buried in the 380s. When they became available in translation in the 1970s, these so-called Nag Hammadi texts caused enormous excitement, suggesting as they did that the earliest Christianity was far more diverse in tone than … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius. Theologian of Grace– Part Four

BEN: Arminius seems to work hard to avoid making God the author of sin, or of anything evil for that matter, including the Fall. He is very willing to talk about God's 'permissive' will when this subject comes up, though he does talk about God permitting such things for two reasons: 1) because he has endowed human beings with genuine freedom, by which I mean the power of contrary choice, the ability to choose or not choose good or evil; and 2) because he believes God can even use evil to some … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius. Theologian of Grace– Part Three

BEN: There is also a strong emphasis early on in the book on what is called the 'intellectualist' approach to the nature of God, which is to say that God's knowledge is given priority over God's will in the divine attributes. This in turn seems to lead Arminius in a very different direct than Calvin when it comes to figuring out the relationship between God's knowledge and God's will (e.g. Calvin and later Calvinists would argue that God knows things with certainty because he antecedently … [Read more...]

Jacob Arminius, Theologian of Grace– Part Two

BEN: Jacob Arminius seems to be a frequently misrepresented theologian, whose works have been neglected, and lack readily accessible translations into English from the Latin and Dutch. To what would you attribute this neglect, and would you see this as an explanation for why his theology is so often caricatured in various unhelpful ways?KEITH: There are many reasons why Arminius' writings have been neglected. Although there is an accessible English edition of the main body of Arminius' … [Read more...]

Mr. Holmes is Coming!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qng3t9RZk6Q … [Read more...]

Hebrews in Eight Minutes– Courtesy of the Bible Project

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9wqN-nwSzEKudos to Vivian Sawyer for finding this. It's got some helpful points, though it ignores the rhetorical character of Hebrews unfortunately. … [Read more...]

Roger Olson’s– ‘Arminian Theology’– Part Sixteen

BEN: When the Gospel of Matthew presents us with Jesus saying that he is submitting to baptism to ‘fulfill all righteousness’ he is of course talking about the righteousness that comes from obedience to the Mosaic Law. He is not talking about his righteousness acting as a substitute for his later disciples righteousness in the new covenant. Indeed, he is talking about the fulfilling of the Mosaic Law because Israel didn’t. In other words, this has little or nothing to do with what Paul is tal … [Read more...]