Where We Find the Most Bad Statistics

It’s my impression that the greater the social significance of a topic, the more inaccurate statistics will be created for and used about it. Why? 1) The more significant a topic, the more people will measure it, so there will be more statistics about it anyway. 2) The greater the significance, the more people will have incentive to either create or use misleading statistics that best represent their perspective.

Graphically:

"Learned does not in any way demand a "degree" in any shape. As I said ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"They describe the benefit of guidance under a phd program not the need. In regards ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"Sure, but there's a difference between humbling working as an apprentice rather than using fame ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"No, you're the one that's wrong. I suppose you either have not been to college, ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://gruntledcenter.blogspot.com/ Gruntled

    Your graph reminds me of one of my favorite xkcd’s:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/convincing.png

    • http://www.brewright.com Bradley Wright

      That’s hilarious!

  • ProfYancey

    Maybe this is why so many papers is highly rated journals are on such boring topics. It is easier to be more accurate with your data if no one cares about the results of your work. This is probably sad but true.

    • http://www.brewright.com Bradley Wright

      Interesting… hadn’t thought about that.

  • Alex

    It should be exponential, not linear.

    • http://www.brewright.com Bradley Wright

      You’re right… thank you.