Where We Find the Most Bad Statistics

It’s my impression that the greater the social significance of a topic, the more inaccurate statistics will be created for and used about it. Why? 1) The more significant a topic, the more people will measure it, so there will be more statistics about it anyway. 2) The greater the significance, the more people will have incentive to either create or use misleading statistics that best represent their perspective.

Graphically:

"Are you aware that some people have two X chromosomes and a Y chromosome? We ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"Thanks for this. We do, indeed have a way to compare our current environment with ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"The important issue here is global warming and why evangelical Christians often fall in the ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy
"OK, fair enough. Bill Nye is not a scientist. I hereby rename him "Bill Nye ..."

Bill Nye, the “not-so-science” Guy

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Your graph reminds me of one of my favorite xkcd’s:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/convincing.png

  • ProfYancey

    Maybe this is why so many papers is highly rated journals are on such boring topics. It is easier to be more accurate with your data if no one cares about the results of your work. This is probably sad but true.

  • Alex

    It should be exponential, not linear.