Peter Jackson makes it official: The Hobbit will be a trilogy.

First Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was split into two movies. Then The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn was split into two movies, the second of which comes out later this year. And then, just a few weeks ago, it was announced that Mockingjay, the final book in the Hunger Games trilogy, would be split into two movies, too.

Peter Jackson, who practically invented the multi-movie franchise by filming all three parts of The Lord of the Rings in one fell swoop, and who had already committed to splitting its prequel The Hobbit into two movies, apparently decided he needed to do something a little extra, just to stay ahead of the pack. And so, last night, on Facebook, he confirmed the rumours that had been swirling around last week, and announced that The Hobbit will now be a trilogy all unto itself.

This has prompted no small amount of grumbling from Tolkien fans who really, really don’t think there’s enough material in The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings appendices combined to justify three long films. As my friend Steven D. Greydanus has pointed out, the second film was going to be called The Hobbit: There and Back Again, but that seems a little too brief, now, given how padded Bilbo’s journey is going to be. But perhaps the funniest comment comes via Elizabeth Rambo, who passed along a friend’s quotation of a line of Bilbo’s from The Lord of the Rings: “I feel all thin … sort of stretched … like butter scraped over too much bread.”

Given how bloated and self-indulgent some of Jackson’s films have been — starting, I think we must admit, with the extended edition of The Return of the King and continuing with his three-hour remake of King Kong — there is certainly cause to be concerned about similar bloatage and self-indulgence here. But for now, I’m going to hope for the best, and think back to a time when Tolkien fans were astonished and grateful that The Lord of the Rings was going to be a full-sized trilogy, and not reduced to two movies or even just one. For more on the story behind that, click here.

"I remind you, YOU REPLIED to my post that is over 2 years old.I gave ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"I believe I have a gut full of your filthy protestants minds that you cannot ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"Already replied about archangels. The bible mentions ONLY Michael the archangel in Jude 1:9. If ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."
"Genius I asked you to tell me the names of God's Arch Angel's and while ..."

The death, resurrection, and second death ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Elizabeth Rambo

    Thanks for the mention, Peter. Like you, I hope it turns out well, but I’m doubtful. I’ve never automatically subscribed to “bigger is better.”