Nick Kristof on John Stott

I’m a bit amazed by the kind of people who are praising John Stott, and I’m not surprised it is Stott but I am surprised by the sorts who see in him the elegance of evangelicalism. Including David Brooks and now Nick Kristof, both of them not particularly religious public intellectuals. Yes, Stott often stands out against the sometimes uncharitable features of some evangelicals. So, thanks Nick — even if a bit back-handed at times.

Partly because of such self-righteousness, the entire evangelical movement often has been pilloried among progressives as reactionary, myopic, anti-intellectual and, if anything, immoral.

Yet that casual dismissal is profoundly unfair of the movement as a whole. It reflects a kind of reverse intolerance, sometimes a reverse bigotry, directed at tens of millions of people who have actually become increasingly engaged in issues of global poverty and justice.

This compassionate strain of evangelicalism was powerfully shaped by the Rev. John Stott, a gentle British scholar who had far more impact on Christianity than media stars like Mr. Robertson or Mr. Falwell. Mr. Stott, who died a few days ago at the age of 90, was named one of the globe’s 100 most influential people by Time, and in stature he was sometimes described as the equivalent of the pope among the world’s evangelicals.

Mr. Stott didn’t preach fire and brimstone on a Christian television network. He was a humble scholar whose 50-odd books counseled Christians to emulate the life of Jesus — especially his concern for the poor and oppressed — and confront social ills like racial oppression and environmental pollution.

“Good Samaritans will always be needed to succor those who are assaulted and robbed; yet it would be even better to rid the Jerusalem-Jericho road of brigands,” Mr. Stott wrote in his book “The Cross of Christ.” “Just so Christian philanthropy in terms of relief and aid is necessary, but long-term development is better, and we cannot evade our political responsibility to share in changing the structures that inhibit development. Christians cannot regard with equanimity the injustices that spoil God’s world and demean his creatures.”

Mr. Stott then gave examples of the injustices that Christians should confront: “the traumas of poverty and unemployment,” “the oppression of women,” and in education “the denial of equal opportunity for all.”

"Hi Everyone,This thread is called the devil's redemption. I guess my problem is what about ..."

Universalism and “The Devil’s Redemption”
"And for that I am very grateful. Thank you for your commitment. Too many are, ..."

Our God Of Justice
"Lots of people justifiably screaming about women being separated from their babies; not so many ..."

Our God Of Justice
"I'm curious why you think that has anything to do with this topic?"

Our God Of Justice

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • John M.

    A man or woman is most often fully known only in death. I understood that reality so clearly at my Father’s wake. As dozens of people told me anecdotes and stories of his acts of kindness and compassion to the poor in the village where he worked, I knew my Dad in a way that I had not understood during his life. The public and the media seem to have a similar clarity when a public figure dies.

  • JR

    I’m not sure Kristof is Jewish. I think he’s actually a Catholic (non-practicing).

  • scotmcknight

    JR, thanks for this. I edited accordingly.

  • Jon

    Glad to see him being praised from so many angles. Quite a few have been saying good things about him from quarters that I had assumed wrote Stott off on the annihilation issue (Gospel Coalition).

  • Karen Spears Zacharias

    And before John Stott there was Dorothy Day giving us the same sorts of examples.

  • Bill Ferrell

    I am please of the fond remembrances of Rev. Stott. I think he was the real deal.

  • JoanieD

    I am glad to have read Stott’s The Cross of Christ. He was an excellent writer and theologian. I would like to read more of his writings at some point.

  • mark almlie

    I thought Kristof’s point about how religious education used to be rigorous and a scientific education was sub-par, but now the two are reversed was a very, very good point. I am frightened by the lack of education/seminary training some pastors have–both for the sake of their congregation, and for the sake of their views and how the media pick up on it.

    and, yes, i was thankful that Kristof wrote a piece about Stott…it was very good.