Stanley Hauerwas Reacts to Pope Francis I

Stanley Hauerwas says that the choice of a Jesuit to be the new Bishop of Rome tells us a lot about where the Roman Catholic Church is headed in the near future. That Jorge Mario Bergoglio chose the name Francis tells us perhaps even more. Saint Francis – born into wealth – divested himself of everything not simply to minister to the poor, but to become poor himself. I hope that Hauerwas is right. Everything I’ve read so far about Bergoglio’s bio seems to indicate that he lives in real solidarity with the poor. I don’t think that’s something one can simply shut off when power is suddenly thrust upon him. This makes me hopeful.

I’ve heard some progressives lament that Francis I is extremely conservative. But true compassion always seems to trump those kinds of distinctions. The more I read about this choice, the more excited I become. I think he will be a leader much more in the vein of John Paul II. He was conservative, but his leadership was good news for the poor.

Here’s a clip from Hauerwas:

"I've heard that argument before but it really doesn't hold water. Most anyone can turn ..."

Gun Rights and the Virtue of ..."
"Limitations on quantities and type of gun would be a good start."

Gun Rights and the Virtue of ..."
""Repeal and replace": replace with what? Most people favor sensible gun regulations. Most would not ..."

Gun Rights and the Virtue of ..."
"The problem with banning AR rifles is that most anyone can turn a rifle into ..."

Gun Rights and the Virtue of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Nick Gotts

    In what possible sense was JPII’s Papacy “Good news for the poor”? Most of the poor are women, and JPII was mostly about keeping women down.