Seven Psychopaths – derivative retread hell

 

“Seven Psychopaths” is what a filmmaker makes when he thinks no one is looking.  Writer/director Michael McDonagh has hit the skids of derivative and retread hell – think “Pulp Fiction” only on a smaller budget, if that’s possible. He says his new film has a moral conundrum (NY Times Magazine October 14, 2012) but if it does he does not commit to it.

McDonagh also says he finds Shakespeare boring. Fine, everyone has a right to their own opinion. But why did you choose to become boring, too?

You cannot just feel bad about blood and violence. If someone, a character, doesn’t change there is no movie. It’s just a gory dalliance.

I have a very hard time with violent movies but unlike his 2008 masterwork “In Bruges”, “Seven Psychos” is lazy, a cheap cartoon. It’s shot in “as is” Los Angeles and the nearby desert. That’s it. The house near downtown looks like the same one in “A Better Life”; even the furniture looks the same. The thread of violence that binds these characters together, so what? The cat-and-mouse game with kidnapping the dogs and returning them for a reward was funny and some of the dialogue was mildly clever. But the Hollywood self-referent and self-conscious angst of the writer played by Colin Farrell was painful to watch and rang phony.

If “In Bruges” was art, “Seven Psychopaths” is nothing.

I expected more.

If this is supposed to be some kind of treatise on the banality of gratuitous violence in movies, who are you preaching to?

I hope Mr. McDonagh knows how to sing more than one note because a brilliant someone made “In Bruges.”

 

 

"The movie is good.It is very touching.Watch Gifted online"

“Gifted” a look at genius and ..."
"An ignorant reviewer once said "I'm glad they had the priest recant his faith in ..."

Liam Neeson sees God as love, ..."
"I think Liam's idea about God are childish and foolish. God does love us but ..."

Liam Neeson sees God as love, ..."

Browse Our Archives



What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment