Breaking News: Killing Girls A-Ok with B.O. and his democrat cronies…

… I’m sorry Mr. President, who exactly again is waging a “war on women”? Just so we are clear; your administration is against gender discrimination as long it doesn’t prevent monies from flowing to your bedfellow, Planned Parenthood.

I wonder, would the bill pass if it proposed to ban abortions based on race (something that was actually in an early form of this bill)? Are you not the least bit worried, Mr. Barry, that recent polls show a growing trend of voting people identifying as pro-life and internationally girl infanticide is considered evil. I know history isn’t your strong point *cough Polish death camps* but surely you remember 1995? Oh, wait. You were probably high, or busy eating dog. Whatever.

During that UN Conference a platform was adopted that established “eradicating violence against the girl child” as global priority and it sought to “enact and enforce legislation protecting girls from all forms of violence, including female infanticide and prenatal sex selection.”

You know who bans sex-selective abortions, there Barry? Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, India and Vietnam. Wait, what? China, yes, even flipping baby hating China has officially outlawed the practice.

In other news: ALL mainstream media news outlets have full coverage of, who else, John Kerry and …. squirrel!

About Katrina Fernandez

Mackerel Snapping Papist

  • Oregon Catholic

    As heinous as it is to sex-select abort, I don’t think the gendercide argument will get any traction in the US. If a woman is aborting to achieve her nice planned family of 1 boy and 1 girl she will be just as likely to abort a boy if she already has one and keep trying for a girl. Ironic as it is, this will be touted as a good thing, you know, an equal opportunity abortion. Not like that awful stuff going on in China and India.

  • Christian LeBlanc

    Nothing in the US trumps abortion.

  • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

    I think you would have hard time finding any “pro-abort,” anywhere, who’s enthusiastic about sex-selective abortion.  I don’t live in the U.S. now so I don’t know what people are saying about this bill, except for what I read on blogs, but the main criticism I’ve seen is that it aims at fixing something that isn’t broken — that is, the ratio of girls/boys born in the U.S. is within biological norms, and isn’t lopsided, so why add any more regulations, administrative burdens, intrusive questions, etc.

    I live in a country that bans sex-selective abortions, and what I’ve seen is that doctors are sometimes reluctant to reveal the gender of a baby to an expectant mother. My own doctor here did tell me the gender of my son when I had my pre-natal testing, but I know many friends whose doctors refused to tell them, presumably fearing prosecution.I would guess that if a bill like this ever does pass in the U.S., the next logical step might be forbidding a doctor to tell a woman that the baby she’s carrying has Down syndrome or a serious health problem, because she might then decide to abort, and this would be discrimination against the handicapped.

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thecrescat Katrina Fernandez

      9 out of 10 babies receiving prenatal screenings indicated a possibility for Downs are aborted. We are already practicing eugenics and discrimination against the handicap. Aren’t you appalled and disgusted by this? 

      http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/how-can-we-stop-more-down-syndrome-babies-from-being-aborted

      • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

        Yep. I support choice, which unfortunately includes choices that appall and disgust me (as my choices appall and disgust some people, surely).

        • Dan

          What “choice” do you support?

          Murdering prenatal persons in the womb?

          Do you honestly support someone’s “choice” to come to your home when you are sleeping and kill a member of your family?

          This is not freedom.
          It license.

          • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

            My home is not my womb. 

          • Dan

            It was for 9 months and it is as well for millions of human persons evry day of the year for all of time.

            The Human person in a womans womb is not their “property” to slaughter as they will.

            He or she is a creation of Almighty God who wants that person to be one of the elect and share the Beatific Vision [Love] of Him for all eternity.

          • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

            My womb is mine, Dan. Not yours. Stay out. Thanks.

          • Dan

            Your womb is Gods, not yours or mine.

            Becoming pregnant is a direct manifestation of Gods Will, whether permissive or active.

            No one, no human being has the right to slaughter what is his as an innocent human being.

            Again, please finish you incomplete sentence: You support what “choice”?

          • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

            I support my choice to remove anything or anyone from inside my body – but mostly, to prevent a baby from attaching to my uterus using my chemicals/ devices that render it sterile so that implantation cannot occur even if conception does. 

            I repeat, my womb is mine,  and certainly not yours, Dan, despite your insistence that you have a right to control what I do with it, and force me use it for what you believe God wants me to use it for. Sorry, no one gets to decide that but me. 

          • Dan

            L,
            Then do not take my word for it rather hear what Gods Church says about the intinsic evil of induced abortion:

            What the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about
            Abortion

            2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the
            moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must
            be recognized as having the rights of a person — among which is the inviolable
            right of every innocent being to life.
            2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the
            moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must
            be recognized as having the rights of a person — among which is the inviolable
            right of every innocent being to life.

            Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I
            consecrated you.
            My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret,
            intricately wrought in the depths of the earth.

            2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of
            every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.
            Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is
            gravely contrary to the moral law:

            You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to
            perish .
            2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of
            every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.
            Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is
            gravely contrary to the moral law:

            You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to
            perish .

            God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding
            life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be
            protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and
            infanticide are abominable crimes.

            2272 Formal co-operation in an abortion constitutes a grave offence.
            The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime
            against human life. ‘A person who procures a completed abortion incurs
            excommunication latae sententiae’ ‘by the very commission of the
            offence’, and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law . The Church does
            not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the
            gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is
            put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.
            2273 The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual
            is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:

            ‘The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by
            civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on
            single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by
            society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the
            person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin.
            Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human
            being’s right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until
            death.’
            2272 Formal co-operation in an abortion constitutes a grave offence.
            The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime
            against human life. ‘A person who procures a completed abortion incurs
            excommunication latae sententiae’ ‘by the very commission of the
            offence’, and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law . The Church does
            not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the
            gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is
            put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

            2273 The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual
            is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:

            ‘The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by
            civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on
            single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by
            society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the
            person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin.
            Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human
            being’s right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until
            death.’

            ‘The moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the
            protection which civil legislation ought to accord them, the state is denying
            the equality of all before the law. When the state does not place its power at
            the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more
            vulnerable, the very foundations of a state based on law are undermined. . . As
            a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn
            child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal
            sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child’s rights.’

            2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be
            defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any
            other human being.
            Prenatal diagnosis Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, ‘if it respects the life and
            integrity of the embryo and the human foetus and is directed toward its
            safeguarding or healing as an individual… It is gravely opposed to the moral
            law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion,
            depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death
            sentence.’
            2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be
            defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any
            other human being.

            Prenatal diagnosis
            Prenatal diagnosis
            is morally licit, ‘if it respects the life and
            integrity of the embryo and the human foetus and is directed toward its
            safeguarding or healing as an individual… It is gravely opposed to the moral
            law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion,
            depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death
            sentence.’

            2275 ‘One must hold as licit procedures carried out on the human
            embryo which respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve
            disproportionate risks for it, but are directed toward its healing, the
            improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival.’

            2275 ‘One must hold as licit procedures carried out on the human
            embryo which respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve
            disproportionate risks for it, but are directed toward its healing, the
            improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival.’

            ‘It is immoral to produce human embryos intended for exploitation as
            disposable biological material.’
            ‘It is immoral to produce human embryos intended for exploitation as
            disposable biological material.’

            ‘Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are
            not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to
            sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the
            personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity’ which are
            unique and unrepeatable. See also: Life is a gift from God
            ‘Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are
            not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to
            sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the
            personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity’ which are
            unique and unrepeatable. See also: Life is a gift from God

          • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

            I don’t share that belief, Dan.

          • Dan

            Then you better do some serious praying because you are dead wrong.

          • http://thehomesickhome.blogspot.jp/ L.

            Nope.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X