Let’s assume gay marriages were really worse, ctd… [Blogathon 6/12]

This post is number six of twelve for the Secular Student Alliance Blogathon.  I’m responding to comments in the “Go Ahead, Tell Me What’s Wrong with Homosexuality” thread all day.  You can read an explanation of the Blogathon and a pitch for donations (even if you’re religious) here.

 

 

Ah, but in my pleasure in quoting Waugh to make a mathematical point in the last Blogathon post, I skipped answering the actual question the commenters had asked. “If the marginal impact of gay marriage on gay people was negative, would I change my position?”

The answer is, that it would depend on the data.  I’m always opposed to restricting the liberty of a few exceptional people if everyone else is suffering from it (mandatory vaccines, soda taxes, the list goes on and on).  But this is a weird case.

It reminds me of the studies that claimed that parents are less happy on net than they would be if they remained childless.  When I saw those results, I didn’t think we should discourage parenting.  I suspected that happiness was a poor outcome variable to choose to track.  I’m not sure what the right one would be (‘flourishing‘ is hard to quantify).

If I saw convincing numbers that gay marriage was harmful, I’d be much more likely to assume we were preparing people for marriage badly than that the institution should be scrapped for that group.

"Leah sighting.http://www.patheos.com/blog...This contains a link to a twitter comment from Leah. Good to see she ..."

I’m keynoting at a Con for ..."
"So, not sure if you all were aware of this, but it looks like Leah ..."

I’m keynoting at a Con for ..."
"1864 "Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an ..."

I’m keynoting at a Con for ..."
"Is there something that I have said that is inconsistent with official Catholic teaching? I ..."

I’m keynoting at a Con for ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Nicola

    I suspected that happiness was a poor outcome variable to choose to track. I’m not sure what the right one would be (‘flourishing‘ is hard to quantify).

    There was an interesting article in New York Magazine a couple of years ago that touched, among other things, on the fact that parents rate themselves lower on measures of moment-to-moment happiness, but also much much higher on measures of “meaning” and motivation, connectedness, etc., and far lower than non-parents on measures of depression.