Witchcraft Is Political And It’s Time To Use It!

Witchcraft Is Political And It’s Time To Use It! July 26, 2019

Following a previous blog entry, among the comments I received was one accusing me of politicising witchcraft. Herewith is my response: Witchcraft is, has been and will always be political! It is a natural and societal response to oppressive systems that sustain the gulf between those with money and power and those without. It arises in the gap generated when the few languish in the grotesque affluence of position, while many suffer intolerable and crushing effects of austerity, poverty, discrimination and socio-political cruelty.  Such culture inevitably generates suspicion, paranoia and, necessarily, recourse to means outside of the harsh reality of the oppressed. This frequently manifests in society as a belief in witchcraft.

…I propose a witchcraft to openly and purposefully work to arrest the rapid decline of the climate, overturn the human systems which harvest resources for personal gain, and to promote positive action toward healthy restoration of a life sustaining environment…

In a rather off-hand and trite manner, I flippantly answered the accusation with the comment, ‘tell that to the Pendle Witches‘. Realising that this sounds rather hackneyed, an explanation is in order. For those who are unfamiliar, the Pendle Witches were twelve people, almost all women, charged with witchcraft in the Lancashire Witch Trials of the early 17th Century. They were accused of murdering 10 people through malificium, harmful witchcraft, and the sequence of events was triggered by a chance encounter that I shall briefly recount. In the retelling of this happening, please consider carefully whether it was politically charged.

Alison Devizes belonged to the social class of the poorest individuals in the early 17th Century who mostly occupied their time begging as their precise circumstances, like many around them, provided neither means nor opportunity. The country had experienced some tumultuous times with the Reformation, Counter-Reformation and eventual crowning of King James I. This was a particularly dangerous time and the atmosphere must have been charged as Protestantism began its ascendency and the Catholic Church sought to retain its wealth and power, with both sides clashing in sinister and murderous clandestine plots back and forth. The political and religious struggles of the upper echelons had wrought murder and mayhem on the population at large through competing religious and political factions. King James, who was the monarch at the time of the Pendle Witches, was a particularly cruel and troubled patriarch, writing on both witchcraft (in his Demonologie, a compendium of witchcraft lore) and famously issuing an edition of the Bible. He would go down in history as the subject of a plot against his person and parliament when Guido Fawkes, as part of a conspiracy orchestrated by Robert Catesby, attempted to blow Parliament up in 1605, less than ten years before the Pendle Witch Trials. King James’ Demonologie is a curious work in which the King asserts his belief in witchcraft and magic and also his prescription for the trial and punishment of the same. This is the environment in which poor Alison Devizes finds herself when she happens across a pedlar from Halifax, John Law, in 1612.

Devizes, we know from accounts, begged some pins from John Law. She attested that she intended to purchase them, which is unlikely as she was definitely poor. Law, for whatever reason, refused and the two parted ways. This would seem natural enough, except that Mr Law stumbled as he walked away and, according to some scholars, suffered a stroke. It was several days before Law’s son brought Devizes to his father at a nearby inn where she confessed having cursed the man and begged forgiveness. There is little doubt that both Devizes and Law were convinced that she had bewitched John Law at his refusal and who, unfortunately, immediately stumbled, fell and became subsequently unwell. The circumstances of the incident, whilst seemingly coincidental, was sufficient at the time to convince all parties, including the accused, that the ill fortune of Law was a direct result of Devizes having used witchcraft against him.


Now, all of the circumstances surrounding this event, which triggered the witch trials of family members, neighbours, and others, took place in an atmosphere so politically charged that the protestant King of England himself feared that he was the subject of malefic magic by witches. Even without her confession, the politics of the time meant that Devize’s word counted for nothing compared to that of a professional man, his son, and magistrates. In quite every way, she never stood a chance. This one incidence is so politically explosive, as a microcosm of the times, that it cost many lives, all of whom belonged squarely in the poorest reaches of a society.

Indeed, one reason that Devizes may have regarded herself a witch must be the utter futility her position and the lack of recourse to any of the means society dictated acceptable. Her family owned no land, produced no goods, earned no money, indeed owned very little except their meagre cottage, Malkin Tower, where the coven allegedly met. Witchcraft was the only means which Devizes and her grandmother, Demdike, likely had in a world which gave them absolutely nothing of consequence except misfortune and treated them with utter contempt. If it weren’t for the trials, their lives would have been as inconsequential as the thousands of others who have passed into history unknown, unnamed and uncared for. History does not remember the starving, the malnourished, the abused and abandoned members of society.  And it is here, in highly political times, that witchcraft usually arises. So yes, witchcraft is political and always has been. Ask the Pendle Witches!

More recently, witchcraft has seen a revival as our modern times burst with political confusion and diametrically opposed ideals stand off with each other. If our witchcraft is not answering the needs of the poorest and most at risk, then what is it good for? Indeed, there are few (if any) members of the higher levels of society who have ever been accused or had cause to use witchcraft. We live in a time when the 600 aristocratic families of Britain have doubled their wealth in the last ten years, the same decade of Conservative policy of austerity measures which, according to the Royal Society of Medicine, have resulted in the deaths of 30,000 in England and Wales in 2015. Meanwhile, in America, where the other famous witch trials occurred in Salem, Mass., wealth disparity means that the top 1% increased its total net worth by $21 trillion between 1989 and 2018.


All of this leads me to arguably one of the most pressing political crises of our time, that of the climate. Across Europe, the Summer of 2019 is another record breaker. This year, the continent experienced its hottest to date, with many countries exceeding historic high temperatures whilst the cities of Europe struggle to cope with conditions created as a direct result of climate change. The Guardian reported that the heatwave gripping Europe is undoubtedly in line with predictions of scientists who indicated “rising temperatures, more heatwaves and prolonged droughts interspersed with periods of heavy flooding.”

In my previous article, I argued that witchcraft is of a rebellious nature, reacting against the currents which seek to keep people down. In particular, I made reference to the climate crisis and the fact that the environment which sustains the human species on this planet is dangerously harmed in such a manner that our very existence is threatened. To that end, I propose a witchcraft to openly and purposefully work to arrest the rapid decline of the climate, overturn the human systems which harvest resources for personal gain, and to promote positive action toward healthy restoration of a life sustaining environment. This, then, is a call to arms! A plea for all to add their witchcraft and magic to the plight of the climate and the life which relies upon it.

In response to this political disaster, which is being ignored by those factions who benefit most from the harvesting of resources and exploitation of people and land, I asked friend and experienced practitioner Lesley Jackson for assistance. Lesley has worked on a sigil to work this magic and I implore you to take this, work with it, empower it, imbue it with the necessary direction and share it broadly and with potency. This sigil is provided here, purposefully created by an expert sigil magic worker, for the exact aim of working political witchcraft in the service of the planet, its complex life systems and environments, and to reverse the impulse that is hell-bent on destroying the climate which sustains us. Please, use this sigil in your work and empower it to these ends. It’s what witchcraft is for!

Sigil crafted by Lesley Jackson, 2019, for the express purpose of being shared and worked for our environment and climate. I am extremely grateful to Lesley for her support in this endeavour and working towards this with me.
About Ian Chambers
Ian Chambers is a folk sorcerer and witch, practicing the craft of the Cunning Man of old, trying to do the best he can in a crazy, mad and beautiful world. Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me! You can read more about the author here.
"There is one powerful British figure from the era of King James who was on ..."

Witchcraft Is Political And It’s Time ..."
"You are right to say that witchcraft was born from the needs and desperation of ..."

Witchcraft Is Political And It’s Time ..."
"The elites aren't noticeably religious nowadays. Nor the churches very powerful.The dispute is solved, though, ..."

Experiencing Lucifer: Rebel Without a Cause!
"That is certainly what the rich and powerful (The churches, the governments and the elite) ..."

Experiencing Lucifer: Rebel Without a Cause!

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Shawn Herles

    You are right to say that witchcraft was born from the needs and desperation of the oppressed. There is a difference however between then and now. People in former times had little or no recourse to any other strategy or means to deal with their oppression or social and political problems. That is not the case today. We have in Western democracies a vast array of charities, political groups, activist groups, and to a lesser degree political parties. We also have the blessing of political freedom, the right and ability to decide for ourselves what political views we hold and believe, and who we vote for, with the result that we have a wide variety of political views and positions.

    So, given that, whenever I hear someone claim that witchcraft or paganism is political, my first question is, whose politics? Nine times out of ten the people making the claim are really saying “witchcraft/paganism = my politics. And that’s a problem, because one of the core values of witchcraft is personal sovereignty. Being sceptical therefore of the politicisation of witchcraft/paganism, and I am deeply so, does not mean I don’t think witchcraft/paganism is not political, it’s that I strongly believe that it is up to the individual to decide for themselves what political philosophy to believe in or views on any issue to take. Personal sovereignty means that I and I alone decide what political views I hold, and what I think may be the right policies on any issue, or for that matter what issues I believe are important. No one gets to decide for me what political views I hold, what issues I am concerned about, and who I vote for. The rebellion of witchcraft is not just a rebellion against oppression in the political sense, it is a rebellion against any and all forms of enforced conformity that seek to override personal sovereignty, and that includes rebelling against anyone trying to make witchcraft into a vehicle for their personal political views, and demanding that everyone else conforms.

  • I’ve become rather jaded by the overuse of the term ‘sovereignty’ over recent years. The time for semantics and intellectual argument is really not as pressing as the dire need to address the (rapidly becoming extinct) elephant in the room.
    It is true, it’s up to you what you do and I couldn’t care less how you justify your beliefs and actions. You can be complicit in the destruction of the environment which sustains life as we know it for the exclusive profit of a handful of individuals, or you can oppose it. One of these systems deliberately works to restrict your personal sovereignty and the other expressly promotes it. I disagree with what you say, but I fundamentally defend your right to say it! Those who gain the most from the climate crisis can not offer the same.
    Your personal sovereignty allows you to do what you like, and I have no vested interest in dissuading you from those decisions that you alone must make. Your conscience must live with the consequence of those decisions.
    Meanwhile, it was 42C in the Surrey Hills the other day, where the Government wants to commence fracking to exploit the resources of an area of outstanding natural beauty. At the same time, unprecedented wildfires smoulder across massive swathes of the Arctic and this European heatwave, where vast areas have exceeded 40 degrees Celsius, is moving (you guessed it) to the Arctic! Yes, it is a choice. Yes, it is based upon personal sovereignty. Yes, nobody should tell you what politics to follow. Yes, the world is ending and we can do something, or we can help a handful of wealthy and powerful individuals exploit ourselves and resources on a global and catastrophic scale never before seen on this planet we call home.

  • There is one powerful British figure from the era of King James who was on the side of the witches and who was a bit of a witch himself….I mean William Shakespeare. His work “Romeo and Juliet” encodes the history of man and the sun in an allegory: (1) man meets the sun (in the party scene where the lovers use the language of religion since man’s early cultural interaction with the sun was nature worship); (2) man gets separated from the sun (the famous balcony scene, encoding man’s separation from nature religion through Christianity and here Shakespeare gives away Juliet’s secret identity with the famous line “Juliet is the sun”); (3) man leaves the sun to burn fossil fuels (Romeo and Juliet part with Juliet saying “O by this count I shall be much again in years ere I behold my Romeo” and Romeo saying “I must be gone and live or stay and die” since staying with the sun economy would have caused economic collapse; (4) Romeo returns to the sun in the tomb scene where he thinks Juliet is dead but she is only in a coma. People think the sun economy is useless but it only appears that way.

    Shakespeare’s era saw the death of the organic economy and the definite rise of coal as the main fuel for the country. Coal and capitalism were intimately intertwined from the start since financing and debt were necessary for coal production.

    All of Shakespeare’s plays I have studied: Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Twelfth Night, Much Ado About Nothing, Macbeth and others….they are all (in a cloaked way) about fossil fuels and Shakespeare clearly thought they were wrong for us and wrong for the planet. Moreover, Shakespeare proposed a goddess, a sacred earth and universe, and was opposed to monotheism.

    He was against capitalism, which is an outgrowth of fossil fuels and could not exist without fossil fuels. The story of the end of capitalism and fossil fuels is encoded in his play Macbeth.

    A witch may do literary interpretations just as a witch may write plays. Magic? yes, definitely. We have always known that literature is magic!