The legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. continues to play out and The Gospel Coalition is hosting some of those considerations among New Calvinists. Thabiti Anyabwile has been debating white evangelicals’ complicity in racism with James White and that exchange led to this arresting comparison from pastor Anyabwile:
Hitler’s Third Reich marched through Europe with hopes to establish his “super race.” Along the way he and his generals killed millions of Jewish people in concentration camps and ovens. He did it in the name of Germany, and by-and-large German people went along with the program. There were the Dietrich Bonhoeffers (who, incidentally, was killed in a concentration camp on this day in Flossenburg) who actively opposed Hitler. But they were in the minuscule minority. The bulk of Germany “followed orders” as soldiers, turned in Jews to authorities, and generally went along with the program.
Nowadays, when we talk about the guilt associated with that period of history, we understand Germany as a whole to be guilty of killing millions of Jews. We would even understand the German people to be complicit in murdering Bonhoeffer. The Germans recognize it too. Today, Germans grieve, confess, remember, and continue in their repentance of that horrific history.
I suspect no fair reader of this post would disagree about German complicity in the Holocaust. Well, in a post reflecting on the 50th anniversary of Dr. King’s assassination, no fair reader should have difficulty admitting the racism of the Civil Rights period and the complicity of white America in Jim Crow segregation and the murder of Dr. King. This was the point of the post and what I said. It should be admitted.
I agree with The District pastor that no one should deny that racism existed at the time when King died, the victim of an assassin’s bullet, or that white Protestants were innocent of racial bigotry. I also agree with Anyabwile that racism still exists.
But if we can allow Germany a seat at the G-8 summit, look to Angela Merkel for leadership in European politics, then cannot pastor Anyabwile view Civil Rights legislation and a host of related policies (including affirmative action) by which the United States admitted its complicity in racism and attempted to amend its ways — all of these actions — as doing for the United States what Germans have done since 1945? Whether or not Anyabwile still believes that racism is as prominent in the United States now as it was when King died is not directly evident in the post in his exchange with White. Sometimes critics of the United States’ racist past speak as if nothing has changed, or that at as long as racism exists in the United States, the nation has not really repented of its ways (and so nothing has changed).
In which case, if we can co-exist with Germany and its few wayward citizens, in fact, if we can look at Germany now as a normal place, why can’t pastor Anyabwile look at his evangelical critics through the lens of post-Civil Rights America? Why not have a view of the United States that recognizes the strides that have been made to eliminate structural racism the way that Germany no longer countenances direct or formal anti-Semitism? And why not regard those people who don’t seem to admit to America’s racism the way many look at the far right in Germany, as aberrations that prove the rule of generally fair and tolerant social standards? Why not view the United States, then, through the lens of its reformed legislation and policies rather than through the optics of the relatively minor figures who deny the extent of racism in America’s past?
If Germany is okay (not great but okay), isn’t the United States also?