Rush Limbaugh is a Cigar-Chomping Idiot

Rush Limbaugh is a Cigar-Chomping Idiot July 2, 2014


I know. I tell everyone not to call people names.

But there comes a time when “idiot” isn’t a pejorative; it’s an excuse.

Mr Limbaugh is doing his the-pope-is-a-marxist-communist-not-a-corporatist-like-me thing again. After reading this latest rather bizarre attack against the Holy Father, I am faced with three possibilities.

1. Mr Limbaugh has relapsed into his drug problem.

2. He’s an idiot.


3. He is deliberately baiting the Vicar of Christ for ratings, despite the fact that a grade-school child could read the interview he’s referencing and know that he’s misquoting and miscasting what the Holy Father said.

Given the choices, I’ve decided that, in charity, I will give Mr Limbaugh the benefit of the doubt and assume that he’s an idiot. I don’t, for instance, think that the fact that he makes at least $70 million per year in salary, or that his net worth is approximately $400 million, has in any way messed with his mind.

What set Mr Limbaugh off on another of his attack-the-Holy-Father spiels is an interview Pope Francis gave to Il Messaggero on Sunday. Rather than try to untangle the web of misquotes and confabulation that Mr Limbaugh has spun, I’m going to quote a couple of highlights, then put Pope Francis’ entire interview below and let you read it for yourself.

Here are what I think of as the lowlights from Mr Limbaugh’s latest attack piece on my spiritual leader, Pope Francis. 

“The 77-year-old pontiff gave an interview to Il Messaggero, Rome’s local newspaper, to mark the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, a Roman holiday. He was asked about a blog post in the Economist magazine that said he sounded like a Leninist when he criticized capitalism and called for radical economic reform.”

Oh, yeah, some obscure blog post in the Economist said he sounded like a Leninist, that got everybody riled up.  We remember that.  Don’t you?  I don’t remember.  Anyway, he said, “I can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel.  Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries later. So when they speak, one can say to them: ‘but then you are Christian’,” he said, laughing.

I don’t know if the pope is saying that Jesus was a communist.  I mean some people could read it that way.  He says the communists stole our flag, and if our flag is rooted in solving poverty, and the communists want to claim that’s what they did, I mean, you connect the dots if you wish.

What Mr Limbaugh is doing here is quoting a misquote from an article headlined “Pope Says Communists are Closet Christians,” and then responding to it with the assessment,  I don’t now if the pope is saying that Jesus was a Communist. I mean some people could read it that way.”

Ok, so he doesn’t know if Pope Francis is saying that Christ the Lord is a Communist? Are we supposed to believe that he’s serious?

Maybe he’s an idiot.

Or maybe this was an attempt to be sly and clever by  attacking with innuendo.

You decide.

Me, I’m going with idiot, because, as I said, it’s the kindest interpretation I can come up with.

Here, for those of you who would like to see it, is what the Holy Father actually said. It’s the whole interview, without cuts or edits.

I highlighted the part about Communism so you can want go straight to it if you want. If you can find the place where the Pope Francis said or implied that Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is a Communist, let me know. Frankly, I think that all you have to do to understand what Pope Francis is talking about is to remember that he’s from a country where children live in garbage dumps and scavenge for survival; a country where Communists have tried to take over by appealing to these poorest of the poor and offering them help.

That, and read the interview yourself instead of miscasting misquotes in order to make a coarse point.

From Vatican Radio:

(Vatican Radio) The Rome daily “Il Messaggero” on Sunday published an interview with Pope Francis made by journalist Franca Giansoldati. In his responses to questions on a wide range of issues, the Holy Father focused, among other things, on the challenges of change in the current “era” and “culture,” which has consequences for political, financial, and social life. The Church, along with various civil and social institutions,  must respond to these challenges by protecting the common good and defending human life and dignity.

“Always protecting the common good, which includes “defending human life and dignity” is “the vocation of every politician,” the Holy Father said. Today, the problem of politics – which Pope Francis called a “worldwide problem” – is that it “has been devalued, ruined by corruption, by the phenomenon of bribery.” This “moral decay, not only in politics but also in the financial or social” sector, is driven by “change of epoch” that we are experiencing today, which is also “a change of culture.” In this context, our anxieties about poverty are not concerned solely with material poverty.

“I can help someone who is hungry, so that they are no longer hungry,” the Pope said. “But if someone has lost his job,” he is involved in another kind poverty. He no longer has his dignity.” Helping families in need, then, requires a “joint effort.” Pope Francis recognized that this is an “uphill” journey, but insisted it must be undertaken, working above all for the good of children. “Starting a family is an effort,” he said, because of economic difficulties that “social policy does not help.” Commenting on the very low birth rates in Europe – which makes it seem “as if she were tired of being a mother, preferring to be grandmother,” the Holy Father noted that the causes of this phenomenon lie not only in a “cultural drift marked by selfishness and hedonism,” but also in the current economic crisis.

Pope Francis was asked how he would respond to being called “a communist.” “I would only say that the Communists have stolen the banner… The banner of the poor is Christian; poverty is at the heart of the Gospel.” The cause of the poor is pre-eminently a Christian cause.  The Gospel cannot be understood “without understanding real poverty.” At the same time, the Pope said there is also a “very beautiful ‘poverty of the spirit’,” being poor in the sight of God because God fills you up. The Gospel, in fact, is addressed indiscriminately to the poor and to the rich and “does not at all condemn those who are rich,” but rather condemns their riches when they become the objects of idolatry.

To the question “Where is the Church of Bergoglio headed?” Pope Francis replied, “Thanks be to God, I don’t have any church – I follow Christ. I didn’t found anything.” He went on to say “my decisions are the fruit of the meetings before the conclave. I have done nothing on my own.”

The Church in Asia “is a promise,” he said, turning to his upcoming trips to Korea, in August, and to Sri Lanka and the Philippines, in January. He also spoke about China, saying it represents “a great, a very great pastoral challenge.”

During the interview, Pope Francis also took up a number of other themes already addressed during his pontificate, such as the place of women in the Church. Without an understanding of femininity, the Pope said, one “cannot understand the Church herself.” Women “are the most beautiful thing God has made. The Church is a woman.” He said that in doing theology, one must take account of this “femininity,” and that the Church must continue to work on and develop a “theology of the woman.”

Pope Francis spoke also about the corruption and the economic and sexual exploitation of children. The Pope speaks of incidents of child prostitution that were reported to him when he was archbishop of Buenos Aires, involving even elderly men. “For me,” the Pope said, “people who do this to young girls are paedophiles.”

Finally, on the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, the patron saints of Rome, Pope Francis spoke about the everyday life and traditions of the City of which the Pope is the bishop. This role, the Holy Father said, is “the first service of Francis.” Pope Francis said Rome shares many of the problems of other cities “such as Buenos Aires.” He said a conference dedicated to the theme of “the pastoral care of the great cities” will take place in Barcelona in November. Pope Francis expressed his hope that the citizens of Rome, the inhabitants of a city “that should be a beacon in the world,” would not lose “joy, hope, confidence, despite difficulties.”

(From archive of Vatican Radio)

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

20 responses to “Rush Limbaugh is a Cigar-Chomping Idiot”

  1. It is beyond clear that the Pope was saying Communists steal Christian ideas, corrupt them, and then pretend they are the good guys by mimicking them.

    All conservative radio show hosts ratings are down, after the last election. So I suspect Limbaughs actions are at least partially driven by the desire for ratings.

    However, if Limbaugh had attacked the Pope for another of his statements – that the worlds biggest economies purposely start wars to keep in control or whatever that weird statement was, then he would be justified. That was the first time I have seen a Pope make a really untrue, wild, almost conspiratorial statement.

    Right after that statement, they said the Pope needed to get more rest.

  2. I didn’t read the entire post above because my reaction to your headline coincides with my long held opinion of rush (small “r” for a reason). I had actually tried a couple of times to listen to him many years ago when the station I listened to in RI aired his show. I could only go 3 minutes before I turned him off. (and the station didn’t renew it’s contract with the show after a couple of years). He is such a waste of air on this planet!

  3. fredx2: Do you have a link to the text of the Pope’s statement accusing “the worlds biggest economies” of “purposely start wars to keep in control”? I want to read it for myself rather than – like Limbaugh – accept somebody else’s unsavory summary.

  4. So embarrassed that dude is from my state. That style of unreasoned and fact less attack has been his stock and trade for years. He sure steps over a lot of Lazarus’s at the door on his way down the wide and narrow road. Franken added a few names to yours in his book…said he was the circus clown distracting us from the ambulances carrying away the victims of Reagonics. I have tried to pray for him but it’s hard and he’s so hurtful and has upset a whole generation of naive senior citizens. I can think of some names but don’t want to go to confession again so soon.

  5. I just really need to ask this: Does anyone else think Rush looks just like Tony Soprano? I can’t be the only one who thinks this.

  6. I think it’s the reverse, and I’m with Pope Francis on this one. Communism is a Christian heresy- it’s taking the first 6 chapters of Acts and trying to build a society on it without Christ. There is a lot of good to be said about that, but sadly like any other ism without Christ, it soon degrades into mass murder.

    Because the real problem with Utopia isn’t creating a better society, it’s creating better people who can live in that society.

  7. I have a sneaking suspicion the Pope might very well be right. America jumps in where angels fear to tread and for what. Oil. As in Iraq. And now see what is brewing there.

  8. “That was the first time I have seen a Pope make a really untrue, wild, almost conspiratorial statement.”

    I sure wish I could find that document that I read back in the 1990s, from the 1970s, where Kissinger made exactly the same statement in a planning session to Nixon.

    People claim this is untrue, but I’ve seen enough evidence from my study of the last 60 years of history to make me wonder if the people who think it isn’t true, have been paying attention at all.

  9. Rush is the poster boy for polarized politics. He is frequently dishonest and hypocritical because he has to spin everything to make his brand of conservative politics look like the ANSWER. He can call what is black, white and his sycophants lap it up and nod their heads. He’s the naked emperor parading down Main Street for his select group of cheering subjects.

  10. I just read through the speech by Pope Francis in Spanish which is always the best rather than English. Because of my experience in Latin America I understand what he’s saying, but I can also see how some would misunderstand what he says.
    I don’t know why Rush decided to do this except to rile up the base. Same as the president saying he will usurp the legislative branch to do what he wants.
    To me it is disingenuous and wrong. Rush just sees the Holy Father as another politician. He is wrong and the whole thing is disgusting.
    Now, Rebecca, a challenge. Write about what another idiot, Frank Schaeffer, a blogger on Patheos, said about Pope Francis on the Hobby Lobby decision.

  11. Thanks Ms. Hamilton for having the courage and (dignity) to say in effect, “if it quacks like a duck…it must be a duck.” Rush is Rich because he spills hate, intolerance, hate, lies, conjecture, hate and more hate to the masses that have fallen victim to the true “enemy”, Satan. Pope Francis is the Light House from which shines our LORD’s Word and I find it refreshing that we have this champion to combat the evil that persists in this world. What I find more alarming though is the Corporate sponsorship that Rush and his cronies enjoy in their neverending quest to do the devil’s work. Shame to all of us that consume the products of these evil doers/haters. It would be great if someone (you perhaps?) could publish a list of all of the sponsors that promote and support the Cigar Chompers rhetoric so that we could avoid supporting them via our pocketbooks. NOthing hurts them more than putting a dent in their profits and bank account.

  12. What a great interview. The Holy Father is a wise man. I love what he said about seeking to understand “femininity”–too many decades of secularists redefining women into some type of men, either as hysterical, lesser-men/playthings, or as stronger, wiser, better-than-mere-men demi-deities. Both are grotesque cartoons of what we are, and it would be great if the Church could paint a more real picture of what we can be with God’s help.

    Oh, and yes, Rush is an idiot. I don’t mean he is truly an idiot, I mean he’s talking like one; he’s too shrewd a businessman to not say what he thinks will get a reaction and therefore listeners. But gaining money by impugning a righteous man is the act of a carnal-minded fool, which translates to “idiot” in my book. Sad for him. :-/

  13. I thought I might chime in, being a former dido head (for those of you in Rio Linda, that is a die hard Rush fan), I thought I might have some insight…

    First off, let me say: I am not Catholic but I simply LOVE the Pope, he is simply marvelous, a true beacon of light in often a very dark world!

    I totally get where many think he is idiot, but he isn’t. No idiot can achieve what he has achieved. So what is he? How does ignorant sound?

    I do believe that Rush has stated a faith in Christ, so I am going to take him at his word that he is a believer. It seems to me that what you are picking up on is his immaturity, his inability to see the world from the point of view of those that are different from him. This inability does seem to be common among the political talking heads, I see it a lot in those on the other side too.

    Might I suggest that rather than calling him names, that we actually focus on doing good. Christ calls us to love our enemies, might I ask all of you that hate Rush to pray for him. Pray that the Good Lord send good mature Christians into his life that will help mature him in Christ?

  14. Happy Independence Day to all Rebecca and the Public Catholic faithful.

    I want to echo those that thanked Rebecca for calling Rush Limbaugh on the carpet. And while I can’t speak to whether or not Rush has relapsed, it seems to me that both possibilities #2 and #3 apply.

    Unfortunately, this is also evidence that anti-Catholicism, even among other so-called Christians, is the last acceptable prejudice. There are those on the religious right that will accept Catholics as long as they are bringing their financial resources and votes to the “right” causes and they aren’t too “Catholic” about it.

    One of the things I am most proud of as a Catholic is our BOTH – AND understanding of God’s creation. Jesus is BOTH God AND man. We know God through BOTH faith AND reason. The Catholic approach to social justice requires BOTH solidarity AND subsidiarity. And on and on. For many on the religious right, however, it often seems that their Christianity is an EITHER – OR proposition. Either you agree with me or you are wrong. Either it’s my way or the highway.

    Sorry this turned into a rant.

    Happy 4th of July.

    Twitter: @RayGlennon

  15. I do not hate him, I no longer respect him though. Sitting on 4 million a year (if rumors be true) is beyond imaging but blinding, in some respects, since I am of the opinion one just cannot imagine what it is like to scramble around in a dumpster for food, bathe in dirty water, let alone drink it, be looked down upon because one’s clothes are filthy and have not bathed in weeks since there is no shelter. I speak of countries where “homeless shelters” are a luxury so folks live in gutters and die there too.

    Imagine what that amount of money could do for our brothers and sisters in Christ who could benefit from clean water, clean shelter, good food and clothes.

    Rather than go after the Holy Father and claim to “know-it-all as talent on loan from God” how about giving away those riches and claim a place in heaven, after having labored in the vineyard to bring comfort to the masses? I mean gee…you can’t take it with you, right?

    Gasp! Is that a communist notion? With Rush as sage, it just might be.
    He has lost all credibility in my book….I used to listen to him lots too…long ago. No more.

  16. If indeed rush has faith in Christ, then he needs to do a little more reading on just what the man, Jesus, taught. IMO the only thing rush believes in is—himself. He gets tons of money to spout his rhetoric. Unfortunately there are those who rank him right up there with a divine being. No, I don’t have any use for him or his rants. As for having him mature? That isn’t going to happen IMO.

  17. He had a TV show too? What could be worse than listening to him AND watching him while he is doing it?

  18. What they “really “said? I wonder if his followers believed him when he interpreted the statements! Probably. Sounds really funny actually. 🙂 I could use another name for the “ditto heads” but Rebecca would have to delete it!