The believer, on the other hand, thinks that God does interrupt the natural order and that he has a right to do so from time to time because he made the natural order and he can interrupt it if he likes. The fairly ordinary believer thinks that God and angels interrupt the natural order to do good things like heal people, protect them from danger and provide for them in time of need–and sometimes they interrupt the natural order to do strange things that help people to believe in them like answers to prayer or stigmata or angels appearing to people or incorrupt bodies of saints and so forth. The believer, therefore, thinks that the natural order is open not closed. For the atheist the cosmos is cut and dried and works according to predictable patterns. The believer thinks that reality is rubbery, that there is more to it than you can see and God–rather than being the dull God of the deists who sets things in order then sits back and falls asleep–is a God of surprises–always tinkering with this and that to help his folks down below.
Well, I’m a believer of course, and I’m a believer in the supernatural. I believe in miracles. However, I am critical of those believers who are too gullible and too ready to proclaim a miracle when there may be a perfectly natural explanation. In this attitude I am simply being a good Catholic. This is actually the Catholic position: we believe in the supernatural and we believe in miracles. However, we also only proclaim a miracle as a last option. We look for every natural explanation first. We consider natural explanations, psychological explanations and natural psychic explanations. We expect there to be a natural explanation and only when there is not other way to explain what has happened to we open up the possibility of a miracle.
According to the official Catholic view, therefore, most “miracles” have a natural explanation. Many cases of healing which believers claim to be miraculous are probably due to human suggestion, the power of the mind and faith and belief over matter, and the support and positive power of human love and friendship. Catholics recognize all these good natural qualities, but throw in the fact that God is also one of the ones dishing out the healing forgiveness and love. In other cases of healing things are more dramatic and the doctors have no explanation for how the person got better. The Catholic simply says, “Praise God!” If the doctor comes by and gives a natural explanation we don’t mind. We were open to that possibility all along.
Let’s take stigmata for example. The stigmata are a well known phenomenon amongst Catholic mystics. There have been documented cases in most every time period from the early middle ages–and some suspected cases before that. Some would say this phenomena is purely psychosomatic–there is a natural explanation which may not be fully explained, but has to do with the not fully understood interaction between the human mind and the human body. What we do NOT do is explain the stigmata away with some crass and shallow explanation like, “the person is crazy and guilty of self harm.” No. We take it seriously. We discover that the person is anything but crazy. They are sane and ordinary and down to earth. St Padre Pio is a good example of this–as are virtually all stigmatists. We therefore say, “The stigmata are a strange physical phenomena in which the human body and mind and soul interact in a way we can’t explain.” So which of the two responses is more open minded and rational? The typical atheist response which is scornful and dismissive and mocking or the Catholic one which examines the case and shrugs and says, “Something strange is going on. We can’t explain it, but it also has a spiritual dimension in which the person seems to be very close to God through their faith.”
The atheist might claim that this is not a miracle–it is simply nature acting in a way that we have yet to explain and understand. This overlooks, however, the seeming arbitrariness of the event. A miracle, by definition, is a break in the natural order. It is not repeatable in any predictable manner. It is observed, but is outside any explanation or any human capacity to predict, test or analyze. If this is the case, then the incident is merely random–a kind of hiccup in the natural order–a strange anomaly–or the unpredictable event is part of some greater pattern and has some greater purpose. Weird Things Happen.
And if a pattern and purpose, then there must be one who is above the natural order who plans the pattern and has a purpose.