Hillary Clinton just compared the Republican Party to terrorists because we are pro-life. Yes, really!
Couching her words in liberal euphemisms for abortion, Hillary said:
“Now, extreme views about women, we expect that from some of the terrorist groups, we expect that from people who don’t want to live in the modern world, but it’s a little hard to take from Republicans who want to be the president of the United States. Yet they espouse out of date, out of touch policies. They are dead wrong for 21st century America. We are going forward, we are not going back.”
Even liberal pundits at MSNBC agree that Hillary’s comparisons are out-of-line and absolutely outrageous:
MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panel strongly criticized Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s comments comparing Republicans to terrorist groups over their views on women.
Host Joe Scarborough called the comparison “absolutely disgusting” and “gutter politics at its worst.” He also argued the remarks were a transparent attempt to distract people from her swelling email scandal amid an FBI investigation. […]
He continued: “It’s not all right…And what Hillary Clinton did is compare somebody who is pro-life — which is close to 50% of Americans — to radical terrorists.”Bloomberg reporter Mark Halperin agreed, saying, “If a Republican did this, the world would come to a halt.” He also said her comments “should be condemned in strong terms.
The biggest problem I see with Hillary’s statement is not even her comparing pro-life politicians to terrorists. The biggest problem I see is how she views those of us who believe that innocent unborn children should not be murdered in their mother’s wombs. She somehow thinks we are “out of touch” or “behind the times” because we simply believe in basic science – a new life with unique DNA begins at conception.
(By the way, Hillary, isn’t someone who sticks with a cheating spouse kind of “behind the times” Yeah… that’s real feminism — What a joke.)
So, Hillary and other self-proclaimed enlightened ones – remember that it is science itself that proves the pro-lifers are on the right side of history. So maybe you shouldn’t talk about history, science, and the so-called “war on women” as if you have all the answers and you don’t have any blood on your hands.
I think Ronald Reagan said it best when tackling such absurdity:
“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
And when those things you don’t know result in the murder of millions of vulnerable lives, perhaps you above all others shouldn’t be the one to compare others to terrorists.