Why Prominent Christian Men are Abandoning the Local Church

Why Prominent Christian Men are Abandoning the Local Church February 19, 2014

Donald Miller, author of many popular Christian books, including mega-bestseller Blue Like Jazz came out of the closet a couple of weeks ago. He admitted that he rarely attends church.

He started his blog post admitting what many men secretly feel: they do not connect with God through singing in church. But then he veered into controversy. He’s had to follow up with a couple of posts clarifying his position on weekly worship.

Many of society’s most prominent Christian men don’t go to church at all, according to Dr. Michael Lindsay, who interviewed 360 of America’s best-known evangelicals, 90 percent of whom were men. These famous believers included athletes, CEOs, Hollywood stars and two U.S. presidents. Lindsay “was shocked to find that more than half – 60% — had low levels of commitment to their denominations and congregations. Some were members in name only; others had actively disengaged from church life.”

Lindsay found these high-achieving men typically practiced their faith alone or in small groups, far from the public eye. He writes, “Executives and politicians are often distressed by the way churches are run. James Unruh, who served as the chief executive of Unisys, was also at one time an elder at his Presbyterian church in California. He has since decided he will never serve again. He couldn’t stand the inefficiency of church meetings, a common refrain among those I interviewed. Others described local congregations as ‘‘unproductive’ and ‘focused on the wrong things.’

“These factors are driving evangelical leaders into the arms of fellowship groups that exist outside the churches, often called ‘parachurch’ organizations,” Lindsay says. “The shift began in the 1950s, but it grew dramatically over the past 20 years as the parachurch sector became more professional and well-resourced. Nearly three-fourths of the leaders I interviewed serve on the board of at least one parachurch organization, such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. They prefer these groups because they have a broader reach and a bigger impact.”

The 40% who did attend church overwhelmingly chose megachurches. “Powerful men choose megachurches because they see the pastor as a leadership peer,” Lindsay said. “It’s not so much the quality of the [worship] service, it’s much more about respecting the senior pastor as a leader. That’s the key.”

I see two lessons for the local church that wants to connect with high-achieving men: 1) You need a pastor who’s a leader, not a poser. 2) Your church needs to accomplish something.

Churches tend to focus on a multiplicity of goals, whereas parachurch organizations bear down on one target. As a result of their single focus, parachurch groups often achieve greater results.

I guess the bottom line is this: Men’s time is valuable and they want to invest it in something that gets results. And they want a leader they can be confident in. Can we blame them?

So what do you think? Comments are open. Or join the conversation on our Facebook page.


Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Leon Zweihänder Urban

    Is this article serious or satire?

  • Guest

    The reason local congros are inefficient by business standards is that they can’t be funded and run like business with real cash flow, and real authority. We beg for scraps and leftovers, and if we exercise authority, rebellious American Christians demonize us and book. How about if American Christian men grew some spines and actually stood fast instead of just critiquing? Get some Jesus sand in your gizzards, guys!!

  • John Whitten

    I doubt that churches can or should be compared to secular businesses. Our objectives are different and the gospel and Word of God is not a profit driven product. We need to define our goals by the Bible, not market demands.

  • J Stewart

    That article is sad in many levels. It says men “can’t connect with God through singing in church”. – they won’t like Heaven then, don’t seem to have a problem connecting with their football team though …. It speaks more negatively about the state of men in the USA than the church. ” That the men who DO go to church overwhelming choose megachurches” – ones which preach a soft Gospel and reasonable, feel-good messages. Where are the godly men? It think this article speaks about the spiritual state of men in America, who live in the mental realm almost entirely, rather than in the spirit. They look at church as just another type of earthly organization, looking for leadership peers in the corporate tree …. but not looking to have a real encounter with the living God… sad