Talking At the Muslim Leadership Is Futile

Talking At the Muslim Leadership Is Futile October 3, 2014
There is no better image of futility and delusion than Herzog's Fitzcarraldo, or Westerners calling upon the Muslim leadership to speak up.
There is no better image of futility and delusion than this still from Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo, or Westerners calling upon the “Muslim leadership” to speak up.

Leading up to the coalition of the willing waging war against ISIS much noise was made about getting the Muslim leadership to speak up.

Whenever there is any violent crime committed by someone suspected of being Muslim, like the recent beheading in Oklahoma, there are predictable calls for the Muslim leadership to speak up.

There is one major problem with this tried and found wanting method: there is nobody on the other side of the phone to pick up. It is not that they are sitting by the phone, anxiously hoping the phone will stop ringing. No, there is no phone! Nobody there either.

The vaunted Muslim leadership is clearly like a griffin in two ways:

1. It is as brave and magisterial as both a lion and an eagle.

2. Nothing in reality (outside of our imaginations) actually corresponds to it.

There is nothing new about civilizations or religious traditions projecting their own expectations onto its Others. In fact, there is a whole academic cottage industry built around dismantling the category of religion as a universal. Its best representative is Brent Nongbri’s Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. Nongbri argument pivots around demonstrating how religion is a recent mostly mainline Protestant scholarly invention. Its main assumptions are that private feeling and sincerity toward the infinite are the essence of something that is called “religion” that exists across cultures and can be found lurking behind all the various “religious” traditions as their secret core.

It is fascinating to see how much responses to ISIS seem to display the opposite tendency toward Islam. They nonetheless project prejudices as if they were universals. There is something I would call the “papist temptation” in interpreting Islam and what it is capable of doing in response to wrongdoing by its adherents.

==================================================

If this has piqued your interest then read the rest here on Ethika Politika.

You might also find  both my TOP10 list of books on religion and world politics of interest and an earlier post on why Islam does not need a Reformation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F53yUsgVuL0

"A person's faith/world view is exhibited by their practice, whether religious or not."

Why is the Catholic Experience of ..."
"Good morning, sir. Here's another opinion that doesn't contradict the rest of Scripture. https://m.youtube.com/watch..."

Did God Rape the Prophet Jeremiah?
"What about my grandfather, who developed what was diagnosed by his doctor as a "gluten ..."

The Surprising Anti-Capitalist Logic Behind the ..."
"I am a nurse, and about 5% of Americans who *think* they have celiac disease ..."

The Surprising Anti-Capitalist Logic Behind the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment