Human Solidarity (The Beautiful Gospel of WHEAT)

Human Solidarity (The Beautiful Gospel of WHEAT) May 21, 2017

This is part five of a series on WHEAT—an acronym to describe the Beautiful Gospel in a way that parallels the TULIP of Calvinism, the DAISY of Arminianism, and the ROSES of Molinism. See the previous articles if you haven’t already.

The Nativity
Image credit: The Nativity, eighteenth-century
Russian icon, Wikimedia Commons.

After establishing human depravity, TULIP, DAISY, and ROSES go on to describe how God elects people for salvation. (Though ROSES follows a different order, placing election as the third point.) Calvinism claims that God chooses who will be saved based entirely on his own will. Arminianism asserts that God’s choice is based on his foreknowledge of those who would eventually accept him. And Molinism posits God’s “middle knowledge”—a concept that is frankly more convoluted than would be worth getting into right now.

While the three systems differ on how God makes his choice, they all agree that God has separated individual humans into the elect, who will receive salvation, and the non-elect, who will receive damnation. But the Beautiful Gospel rejects such an individualistic understanding of humanity, salvation, and election.

One human nature

Just as all humans are children of God, so too do we all share in a single human nature. Humanity stands or falls together. Paul makes this clear in both 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 5:

For since death came through a human being, the resurrection of the dead has also come through a human being; for as all die in Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ. (1 Corinthians 15:21–22, NRSV)

Therefore just as one man’s trespass led to condemnation for all, so one man’s act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all. For just as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous. (Romans 5:18–19, NRSV)

And the early church taught the same thing. Benjamin Myers makes the following observation:

The view that humanity is essentially one—that there is a universal human nature in which individuals participate—is so widely taken for granted in early Christianity that it is seldom discussed or defended. (Locating Atonement, p. 82)

He goes on to support this claim with examples from Irenaeus, Athanasius, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa (p. 83). If you haven’t yet done so, you really should either watch his presentation or read his essay published in Locating Atonement, as he covers this whole matter much more thoroughly than I’m going to do in this relatively short blog post.

What all this means is that God has not elected any individuals either to salvation or damnation. The salvation that Jesus accomplished was for all humans. He is “the Savior of all people,” not merely of those who believe (1 Timothy 4:10, NRSV).

Jesus accomplished this salvation by uniting his divine nature with our human nature. Here’s how Athanasius puts it:

Naturally also, through this union of the immortal Son of God with our human nature, all men were clothed with incorruption in the promise of the resurrection. For the solidarity of mankind is such that, by virtue of the Word’s indwelling in a single human body, the corruption which goes with death has lost its power over all. … He has come into our country and dwelt in one body amidst the many, and in consequence, the designs of the enemy against mankind have been foiled and the corruption of death, which formerly held them in its power, has simply ceased to be. For the human race would have perished utterly had not the Lord and Savior of all, the Son of God, come among us to put an end to death. (On the Incarnation, 9)

And Jesus put an end to death by experiencing it himself. As darkness is expelled by the presence of light, so death is expelled by the presence of the one who is himself life. By simply entering into death, Jesus disarmed death’s power once and for all. Here again is Athanasius:

Thus, taking a body like our own, because all our bodies were liable to the corruption of death, He surrendered His body to death instead of all, and offered it to the Father. This He did out of sheer love for us, so that in His death all might die, and the law of death thereby be abolished because, having fulfilled in His body that for which it was appointed, it was thereafter voided of its power for men. This He did that He might turn again to incorruption men who had turned back to corruption, and make them alive through death by the appropriation of His body and by the grace of His resurrection. Thus He would make death to disappear from them as utterly as straw from fire.

The Word perceived that corruption could not be got rid of otherwise than through death; yet He Himself, as the Word, being immortal and the Father’s Son, was such as could not die. For this reason, therefore, He assumed a body capable of death, in order that it, through belonging to the Word Who is above all, might become in dying a sufficient exchange for all, and, itself remaining incorruptible through His indwelling, might thereafter put an end to corruption for all others as well, by the grace of the resurrection. It was by surrendering to death the body which He had taken, as an offering and sacrifice free from every stain, that He forthwith abolished death for His human brethren by the offering of the equivalent. For naturally, since the Word of God was above all, when He offered His own temple and bodily instrument as a substitute for the life of all, He fulfilled in death all that was required. (On the Incarnation, 8–9)

And here’s how Benjamin Myers summarizes it:

Human beings are the products of love. They are created in God’s image for the purpose of reciprocating divine love. Human nature, motivated by an internal principle of desire, tends naturally upward toward God. Since God is the source of all life, to be lovingly moving toward God is to be alive. But to turn away from God, even for one second, is to begin to die: to slide downward, away from life, love, and reality.

Since the beginning of history, the whole human race has been locked in a downward slide toward nothingness. But because of his great love for humanity, the Son of God leapt down from heaven and wrapped himself in our plummeting human nature. Because he was human, he participated fully in our perilous slide toward nothingness. But because he was divine, he was able to arrest our downward movement and to reverse it, initiating an upward movement toward the life, love, and reality of God. In the movement of that one human life, the life of Christ, the whole of human nature has undergone death and resurrection. (Locating Atonement, p. 86)

What about election?

So, you may be wondering, if Jesus is the savior of all humans, then what is election all about? And does this mean that everyone is automatically saved? On the latter question, just hold that thought for the moment. We’ll address the concept of salvation further in the later points of WHEAT. But we are now at a place where we can take a quick look at election.

First and foremost, election (as with everything in the Beautiful Gospel) is about Jesus Christ. Jesus is God’s elect, or his “Chosen One” (Luke 9:35). Secondly, because of Jesus’ election, we can also say that the elect are those people who are “in Christ.” God did not pick and choose which individuals would be in Christ—God chose Christ, and he corporately chose those “in Christ” for his service.

We see this, for example, in Ephesians 1, when the author writes of God choosing people before the foundation of the world. He does not say that God selected which individuals would receive salvation. Rather, he states that God chose us “in Christ” to be “holy and blameless before him in love” (Ephesians 1:4, NRSV).

Who then is in Christ?

In one sense, every human—indeed, all of creation—is in Christ. “For ‘In him we live and move and have our being’” (Acts 17:28, NRSV). And “all things have been created through him and for him. He himself is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:16–17, NRSV).

And in another sense, the realization of all things in Christ is a future state that we look forward to. For in “the fullness of time,” God will “gather up all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth” (Ephesians 1:10, NRSV).

But the most common sense of “in Christ” refers specifically to those of us who presently believe in Christ, who have already been baptized in Christ, and who are seeking to live in Christ. (See Ephesians 1:7–14 and Colossians 2:6–15.)

Our election is not one that blesses us with salvation while cursing the rest of the world to damnation. Rather, God has chosen us in Christ to work with him as a light to the world, to bless the world with our love and good works, and to demonstrate what it looks like to live in Christ.

Furthermore, God has entrusted to us the message of his “exhaustive reconciliation,” which we will consider as the next point of WHEAT.


All posts in the Beautiful Gospel of WHEAT series:

"According to this article, the conditions of Eden are a moot point, because it wasn't ..."

No Marriage in the Resurrection? Here’s ..."
"No, you're actually waaay overdue to talk about polyamory.If you want to be "on time" ..."

It’s Time for the Church to ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment