How not to privatize faith

How not to privatize faith May 28, 2014

We are not saved by a “profession of faith”; rather, we are saved by faith.

In this series, I have contended that faith is public, not private. In this post, I want to address a few applications. I sometimes hear the objection that “we can’t make someone believe” or “we can’t change another person’s heart.” People say this to justify evangelistic methods that verge on easy-believism wherein they assume a “profession” is to be counted as actual decision of faith.

Credit: CC 2.0/pixabay

True—we cannot change hearts, but we can take responsibility for the way we present the gospel message. Since Christian faith is public––being more than words––there are a few things we can make sure to do and say that resist the “privatization” of faith.

I’ll first list two broad points followed by a few specific applications. Broadly, our explanation of the gospel should . . .


We can control what we are calling people to do. To “believe in Jesus” is to give allegiance to a king. This is a revolutionary summons. It reorients the entirety of one’s life. Faith is more than a believing an ideology, which is isolated to a narrow sphere of life. Faith is so much more than belief in a set of doctrines.

Because Jesus is king of the world, Caesar Augustus and the Party Chairman are not. Because God is our Father, our primary loyalty must be given to a new family.

If we do not make this distinction––faith as allegiance versus faith as doctrinal belief––then we risk compromising the gospel by settling or truth. We risk allowing people to remain like demons––having right doctrine but wrong delights.


Evangelicals are fearful at times to say anything positive about “works.” We have to stop theologizing out of fear–– “what if someone thinks . . . .” Our job is to speak the truth. People will always misunderstand or manipulate the most basic of truths––even that God loves us!

Because faith of the essence is public, faith necessarily produces works.

Because I know how people misread a statement like this, let me clarify what I do not mean.

(a) I do not mean that works are the cause of our present justification; rather they are the fruit.

(b) By “works,” I do not mean perfection.

Therefore, saving faith produces more than a profession; it leads to life change. Why do I say this? How does this change our perspective of ministry?

We should not give people the impression that salvation is easier than it is.

I think many modern and non-Christianized people have the opposite problem than Luther, who despaired and was fearful that salvation utterly impossible. Eastern religion is pragmatic, providing methods of salvation that have little effect on the whole of life.

However, this is not Christian faith.

Therefore, I suggest a few ideas that need to be made clear when explaining the gospel. For now, I won’t elaborate on them, except for the last one.

1. The gospel changes our group identity

2. Following Christ has a cost

3. The gospel summons us to obedience to King Jesus

4. Baptize rather than “pray a prayer.”

5. Do not sharply separate conversion and discipleship.

“Discipleship” includes conversation, maturing, and ministry. The faith that saves is the faith that sustains. So, the change of allegiance one has at conversion yields the obedience that marks a disciple. I’ll have to leave it at that for now; to say more requires another post entirely.

"At the Last Supper, our Lord said something relevant regarding the "sign of the New ..."

The Unforgivable Sin? Rejecting the Sign ..."
"Thank you for this article. I've long thought that the unforgivable sin is permanent rejection ..."

The Unforgivable Sin? Rejecting the Sign ..."
"Thanks for the corrections. And yes, I agree that more needs to said here to ..."

Two More Wrong Ways to Handle ..."
"I wouldn't say that we Americans, in general, are more aware of the presence and ..."

Two More Wrong Ways to Handle ..."

Browse Our Archives

Close Ad