Have you ever talked about honor & shame with someone but felt like you and the other person were talking past each other? How can we fix that problem?
Well, let’s be realistic. If someone is really unfamiliar with how honor & shame work, there are no shortcuts on the way to understanding. The challenge is compounded if people have deeply ingrained preconceptions that are mere half-truths.
I especially have Westerners in mind. Why is it important to talk about honor/shame with westerners?
Put simply, Western missionaries and theologians still hold tremendous influence over the direction of the global church. Naturally, if a Westerner doesn’t feel the topic relevant for his or her own life, it will be more difficult to stress and apply HS in their ministry.
What can we do then?
In the next few posts, I will offer a few simple ways to engage people in conversation. I’m not going to offer a thorough defense of the importance of honor-shame in Scripture and world cultures. I’ve done that in many other places (like Saving God’s Face).
“Yes, that is a part of it.”
First of all, we need to be aware of the most common misunderstanding people have about honor and shame.
The difficulty here is that most people do have a correct yet partial understanding of honor and/or shame. We often have the bad habit of oversimplifying rich concepts.
Many people associate “honor” with knighthood and think of it as a relic of the Middle Ages. Ideally, this sort of honor reflects a person’s virtue. In actual fact, of course, many would settle for a good reputation by one means of another.
Eastern (not Western?)
Some people regard honor-shame as an “Eastern” concept, in contrast to Western notions “law.” Therefore, Westerners do not see the relevance of honor and shame in their lives. Little do many realize that honor/shame are universal human concepts.
Other people cannot separate honor/shame from “honor killings.” “Honor” becomes a code word for pride and is seen in purely negative terms. In an East Asian context, many missionaries similarly frown upon the idea of “saving face.”
Subjective (not objective)
This point has overlap with prior conceptions of honor/shame. However, here I want to emphasize a very typical way that people verbally talk about honor/shame and so minimize its importance. Someone routinely says to me, “Shame is subjective, but law is objective.” The person then proceeds to explain why “law” (in his or her view) is more important or “biblical.”
Why have I begun a series with a list like this? Simply put, it’s hard to explain something to people when you can’t anticipate areas where they might have misunderstandings.
My friend over at honorshame.com has written a similar post that I encourage you to look at as well.