How is the Kingdom of God Coming?

How is the Kingdom of God Coming? May 27, 2011

Part 13 of series:
What Was the Message of Jesus?

So far in this series, What Was the Message of Jesus?, we’ve seen that the core of Jesus’ proclamation was “the kingdom of God has come near” (Mark 1:15). In my most recent posts in this series, I focused on the question of when the kingdom of God is coming. In fact, Jesus proclaimed the kingdom as something both present and future, as something “already and not yet” here on earth. Like a mustard seed, God’s reign begins as something small and insignificant, but in time it will become great and glorious.

This leads to an obvious question: How is the kingdom of God coming, according to Jesus? By what means will God begin to reign on earth more fully and obviously?

Before addressing this question, I want to survey other Jewish options in Jesus’ day.

First-Century Jewish Views on the Coming of the Kingdom of God

In the first century, there were a variety of answers to the question of how God’s reign would come on earth. Some Jews believed that the kingdom would come through armed rebellion against Rome. The Zealots and others with a revolutionary bent continually plotted ways to undermine and ultimately depose the Romans. Ultimately, this strategy lead to the Roman decimation of Judea and the destruction of the Jewish temple in A.D. 70.

Other Jews rejected this approach, preferring instead to wait for God’s dramatic intervention. The Essenes at Qumran near the Dead Sea had grand visions of an apocalyptic war between the sons of light and the sons of darkness, a war in which God would finally vindicate his people and restore both his temple and his kingdom. The folk at Qumran were disinclined to look for human agents who might bring the God’s kingdom, probably because their experience of Hasmonean (Maccabean/Jewish) rule of Judea had been such a negative one.

Cave 4 at Qumran, the source of many of the Dead Sea scrolls. This picture used by permission of, an outstanding website of photos of biblical sites.

In many of the Jewish kingdom scenarios, God would act through a human being who would execute divine justice and restore divine rule over Israel. Only a few Jewish texts refer to this human as the Son of Man (literally in Hebrew/Aramaic, “the human being”). More commonly, however, the human agent of the kingdom was called “the anointed one” (in Hebrew, mashiach or “messiah”). There wasn’t one established set of expectations for the messiah, however. The Dead Sea Scrolls, for example, actually speak of multiple messiahs, including a priestly messiah and a royal messiah.

Common to every Jewish scenario of the coming to the kingdom was the expulsion of the gentiles who ruled over Judea. In Jesus’ day, the Romans were the hated overlords whom, it was hoped, would someday be vanquished by the Lord and his anointed leader. One Jewish writer, perhaps a Pharisee, wrote a collection of psalms, one of which bears passionate witness to Jewish hopes for the coming kingdom:

See, Lord, and raise up for them their king,
the son of David, to rule over your servant Israel
in the time known to you, O God.
Undergird him with the strength to destroy the unrighteous rulers,
to purge Jerusalem from gentiles . . .
He will gather a holy people
whom he will lead in righteousness . . . .
And he will be a righteous king over them, taught by God.
There will be no unrighteousness among them in his days,
for all shall be holy,
and their king shall be the Lord Messiah. (Psalms of Solomon 17)

Jesus proclaimed the reign of God to a people who fervently hoped and prayed for its coming. Yet he did not affirm common Jewish expectations for how the kingdom would come. He didn’t raise up an army to wage war against Rome. And he didn’t promise that God would fight this battle himself in some imminent Armageddon. In fact Jesus’ answer to the question “How will the kingdom come?” was quite novel, elusive, and frustrating.

Now that I’ve established the Jewish context for Jesus’ explanation of how the kingdom will come, I’ll focus on Jesus in my next post.

"Happy birthday USA you are 243 years old today. Like in a marriage, a lot ..."

Astounding Freedom: A Reflection for Independence ..."
"Great article on Thanksgiving. More of us should be thankful to those who work hard. ..."

A Simple “Thank You” That Makes ..."
"Thank You, I hope our paths will cross again. Till next time, make it a ..."

How to Make Your Job So ..."
""For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God's sight, ..."

Grace Will Find You Out

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Evan


    Hopefully, this is a good place in your series to note that many rabbis, looking at the Messianic passages in the Tanakh (Old Testament) came to the conclusion that there would be TWO Messiahs: the glorious, kingly all-conquering Messiah (The Son of David-Israel’s conquering king) and the suffering, dying priestly Messiah (The Son of Joseph-the suffering son of Jacob.) I recall reading that some rabbis concluded that the Son of Joseph would suffer and die, but the Son of David would raise him from the dead, since it seemed clear to them that the Son of Joseph would be resurrected after dying.

    God has said that He likes to hide things, and require effort and thought to understand His message. Personally, I would like to think that if I were God, I would do it differently, but that is just my humanity talking. Still, that principle certainly appears to be at work in this topic.

    What would those rabbis have thought about this proposition, though: Instead of two Messiahs that come once, there is one Messiah that comes twice?

    The Son of Joseph has come, suffered, died and returned from the dead in the Gospels. The book of Revelation looks like the Son of David will be the guise in which He returns.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks, Evan, for adding this info. I was not planning to talk about the rabbis only because they come after Jesus. But the notion of more than one messiah was around in the time of Jesus, at Qumran, at least.