The Sudarium of Oviedo: The “Other Shroud” of Jesus

And so Simon Peter also came, following him, and entered the tomb; and he saw the linen wrappings lying there, and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.

John 20:6-7

What exactly are we talking about here?

The “linen wrappings”—well, that’s the shroud, what has become known as the Shroud of Turin.  But what about this “face cloth” that was rolled up in a separate place?

It was Jewish custom at the time of Jesus’ burial to first clean and cover the face, as a sign of respect and compassion for the family.  Mourners would then cover the body with fragrant herbs and wrap it in a shroud, or burial cloth.  When Jesus rose from the dead, it is believed, he set aside the face cloth before emerging from the tomb.

This small linen napkin, measuring approximately 2¾ feet by 1¾ feet, is called the Sudarium (Latin for “face cloth”).  It was preserved from the time of the crucifixion in a reliquary; however, the two linens were separated—eventually being carried to other countries.  The Sudarium made its way to the town of Oviedo, in north-central Spain, where it has been venerated for centuries.  In 840 A.D., King Alfonso II of Asturias erected a chapel to protect the Sudarium, which was enshrined in an elaborate reliquary chest called the Arca Santa.

The Sudarium is now housed in a reliquary with a Romanesque metal frontal, and is displayed for the public in Oviedo three times each year:  on Good Friday, on the Feast of the Triumph of the Cross (September 14), and on the octave of the feast (September 21).

The Sudarium has assumed importance in recent years for two reasons:


Unlike the Shroud (called a “sindon” in New Testament Greek), it has never been missing, so there’s no question regarding its ancient origin.

  • Notorious carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin placed its date of origin in the 1300s, meaning that—if this controversial reading were correct—it would be nothing more than a pious forgery.
  • On the other hand, the Sudarium—which has been in the possession of the Knights Templar, the Moors, El Cid, saints and bishops—is known to have been in Spain since 631 A.D.   Before that it was, according to an account by Antoninus of Piacenza, hidden in a cave near the monastery of St. Mark, not far from Jerusalem.  When Persian forces invaded the Byzantine provinces in 614, the oak case in which the Sudarium was kept was spirited out of Palestine through northern Africa by Philip “the Presbyter,” a leader of the Christian community in Palestine.  Philip and his precious cargo were welcomed to Alexandria by John the Almoner, bishop of Alexandria at the time.  When the Persians pushed on into Egypt, the chest was carried into Spain and entrusted to St. Fulgentius, who sent it on to Seville.  The Ark was carried from Toledo north to Monte Sacro in Asturias in 711 A.D., to escape the advancing Moors.  It was there that King Alfonso II turned back the Moors and erected a Camara Santa (holy chamber) to shelter the relics.  King Alfonso had the ancient oak chest plated with silver with the inscription “The Sacred Sudarium of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”


The Sudarium also helps to authenticate the Shroud of Turin because of notable similarities between the two cloths.

  • Of prime importance, the blood and lymph stains on the two cloths match—both are type AB, which was uncommon among medieval Europeans but is a common blood type in the Middle East.
  • The material used in the two cloths is identical, although there are differences in the manner of weaving.
  • Pollen residues on the Shroud and the Sudarium both provide evidence that the cloths were in the same region of Palestine.
  • Stains on the two cloths would also seem to match.  Because of the way the Sudarium would have covered the head, there is no clear face print—but there are remarkable correlations between stains on the two cloths.  The Sudarium would have been wrapped over the head of Christ while his relatives waited for permission to remove the body; and so the stains show that the body was held in a vertical position with the head dropping back.  At the back of the head, the cloth shows blood from deep puncture wounds, similar to the wounds on the Shroud of Turin, which may have been made by the crown of thorns.
  • A second, overlaying stain was produced by fluids excreted from the nostrils when the body was lain horizontally.  According to the Investigation Team from the Spanish Centre for Sindology, which has been studying the Sudarium since 1989, this second set of stains is composed of one part AB-type blood and six parts oedemal fluid.  This fluid proves, according to scientists, that the victim died from asphyxiation—which is the cause of death for people who are crucified.
  • Comparing the cloth to the Shroud of Turin, one researcher has identified 70 points of correlation on the front of the Sudarium and 50 on the back. Dr. Alan Whanger, professor emeritus from Duke University, used a Polarized Image Overlay Technique to demonstrate correlations between the two cloths.


Well, as is the case with the Shroud, the Christian is not compelled to believe in the authenticity of the Sudarium of Oviedo.  Its existence, though, does help to prove that the image on the Shroud which has become so familiar to us is, in fact, that of a man who died by crucifixion in the first century A.D.

It is an inspiration for prayer, and an encouragement for faith.

  • Patty

    I had not known about this cloth prior to a bible study course offered by my Catholic church before Lent. My instructor used both biblical passages and passages from a book written by Sigmund Brouwer entitled ‘The Carpenter’s Cloth’. I was so moved by the passages from the book that I purchased it. I read this book during Lent every year (it must be going on ten years now). I purchased it for several relatives and they have told me how much they love it too. I also read ‘The Weeping Chamber’ during Lent which is also written by Brouwer. I have bought this book for several relatives also. I find that by reading these two books I am drawn into the last days of Our Lord’s life and passion. Easter is more meaningful and beautiful to me.

  • Maggie Goff

    This was fascinating. Thank you.

    Thank you also, Patty for your book suggestions.

  • Gunnar Henrioulle

    You know, we can actually feel sorry for atheists, who strain mightily to put aside the impossibility of evolved DNA, motor cells, how humans survive in a thin band of the light spectrum, the Periodic Table of the Elements, too many complicated and interrelated wonders of creation… And now, with the work of Isabel Piczek on the Shroud of Turin, poor evolutionists are faced with ever more solid assault on their most boasted virtue: “intellectual honesty”!

    Mohammedanism is probably the most to be pitied, however: How can readers of the Qur’an be comfortable with knowledge of prophetic fulfillment of the crucified & resurrected Jesus Christ? How can Islam then ignore the warnings in Genesis 12 concerning the Land and Jerusalem? Are there any Middle East leaders able to fathom the warnings of Psalm 83 and Isaiah 17?