6 years ago: Let us reason together

Feb. 21, 2007, on this blog: Let us reason together

So there I was, at the end of what was, undeniably, a dead end street, consulting a map that claimed otherwise. It was something of a Groucho moment: “Who are you going to believe? Me or your lying eyes?” I sided with my own two eyes, thus accepting the principle that reason and experience were essential considerations for evaluating the meaning and application of the text. In a sense, I was fumbling my way toward something like Wesley’s “four-legged stool.”

No one was claiming, of course, that my county road atlas ought to be read as the inerrant, infallible and authoritative Word of God, so my fundamentalist teachers would not have disagreed with my choosing, in this case, to regard my own experience of the terrain as worthy of consideration.

Nor did they deny that I would encounter similar disparities when consulting the “map” of scripture. In that case, however, they taught that I must always side with the map. That is what it means to be a fundamentalist.

"Seven. Seven banned words.For those of us of a certain age, in this context, let's ..."

Some notes and rules for a ..."
"The brass section of the Philadelphia Orchestra did an utterly gorgeous carol album 50 years ..."

Some notes and rules for a ..."
"I'm glad someone mentioned The Killers' Christmas songs. "Joel the Lump of Coal" is a ..."

Some notes and rules for a ..."
"But only the organizations of which he approves."

Some notes and rules for a ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://www.facebook.com/jake.litteral Jake Litteral

    I guess I have to face the reality that according to most fundagelicals, I am going to hell.  I don’t regard scripture as inerrant, it is not a “magic book” and it sure as hell is not a guide book for sexual ethics and science. But it’s good that I have many brothers and sisters here on this blog and others who stand with me, judged as heretics.

    *Takes a sip of cold coffee*