I’m settling in with friends old and new at the Convent in Cincinnati for a writers’ retreat this week. I’m hoping to make some much-needed progress on the chapters of the Slow Church book that I’m writing.
I have taken the opportunity this weekend before and on my way to the retreat to read some of what Wendell Berry has said about the necessity of limits. I’ve been meaning to do so for awhile, but this weekend I stumbled upon this fabulous essay that Berry wrote in 2008 for Harpers Magazine — Faustian Economics: Hell Hath No Limits. This is a short essay and well worth reading.
Berry gets to the heart of the issue:
The problem with us is not only prodigal extravagance but also an assumed limitlessness. We have obscured the issue by refusing to see that limitlessness is a godly trait. We have insistently, and with relief, defined ourselves as animals or as “higher animals.” But to define ourselves as animals, given our specifically human powers and desires, is to define ourselves as limitless animals—which of course is a contradiction in terms. Any definition is a limit, which is why the God of Exodus refuses to define Himself: “I am that I am.”
In keeping with our unrestrained consumptiveness, the commonly accepted basis of our economy is the supposed possibility of limitless growth, limitless wants, limitless wealth, limitless natural resources, limitless energy, and limitless debt. The idea of a limitless economy implies and requires a doctrine of general human limitlessness: all are entitled to pursue without limit whatever they conceive as desirable—a license that classifies the most exalted Christian capitalist with the lowliest pornographer.
What does Berry recommend for us as we start to repent of our limitless living?
[Our] human and earthly limits, properly understood, are not confinements but rather inducements to formal elaboration and elegance, to fullness of relationship and meaning. Perhaps our most serious cultural loss in recent centuries is the knowledge that some things, though limited, are inexhaustible. For example, an ecosystem, even that of a working forest or farm, so long as it remains ecologically intact, is inexhaustible. A small place, as I know from my own experience, can provide opportunities of work and learning, and a fund of beauty, solace, and pleasure—in addition to its difficulties—that cannot be exhausted in a lifetime or in generations.
To deal with the problems, which after all are inescapable, of living with limited intelligence in a limited world, I suggest that we may have to remove some of the emphasis we have lately placed on science and technology and have a new look at the arts. For an art does not propose to enlarge itself by limitless extension but rather to enrich itself within bounds that are accepted prior to the work.
I challenge you to read this essay and reflect on how our cultural lack of limits has impacted our churches. The limitlessness that Berry describes, I would argue, has swept away many of our churches. First, that the lives of our members have been driven by limitlessness, and torn us asunder by our hypermobility and chasing after “better substitutes” as Berry has described here. Secondly, by falling in line with a narrative of limitlessness, many of our churches have uprooted themselves from the places that they were at some time in the past and relocated to new places that seemed to be “better substitutes.” Thirdly, (and I’ll stop here and take in the comments your thoughts of other ways that our churches have been driven by limitlessness) Church Growth theology is an embodiment of limitlessness in our church communities: churches can and should grow and grow without end or limit.
This theme of limits is one that will undoubtedly recur throughout the Slow Church book…