He speaks about a documentary movie where a disillusioned Hindu man sets out to prove that gurus can be anyone, whether qualified or not. It apparently examines the current landscape of American spirituality, particularly in the “yoga movement.”
I’m very interested to see this movie!
Thus builds the climax of the film: Kumare’s “unveiling.”
While the film has had its touching moments, and plenty of funny ones, this is where it becomes most gripping. Kumare’s whole philosophy has been that he is an illusion, an unnecessary reflection of the goodness within his students. Yet, just as in pretty much any religious context, the students have projected a certain degree of holiness, otherness, and specialness upon him and then take some pleasure or joy in their relationship with that special otherness. If he not only tells them that he is not special, but actually shows them, what will they do?
I think this leads to another interesting effect, which is that it seems like sometimes it doesn’t matter if your guru is enlightened or not. It appears that perhaps even a guru who knows he is not the ultimate source of wisdom can still inspire people to find Truth within themselves. I’ve heard it said that devotion to a master provides the same karmic benefits of devotion whether the master is worthy or not. This is something I’m not sure about (as it seems like being devoted to a master like Hitler could not lead to good things!), but this is a concept that I am interested in examining further. I think this movie will be a great start.