Evangelicals Will Vote Trump

Evangelicals Will Vote Trump January 28, 2016

On Tuesday, Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jr. endorsed Donald Trump. A NBC news poll released that same day found that Trump was the preferred choice of a plurality of evangelical voters nationwide.

At first glance, Trump should be doing poorly among evangelical voters. He has no obvious track record of churchgoing, piety, or evangelical beliefs. He has no track record of supporting causes near and dear to many evangelicals, such as the sanctity of life, opposition to same-sex marriage, or religious freedom. Most evangelicals describe themselves as politically conservative, and Trump has no track record of supporting conservative political causes in general.

Moreover, there are many GOP candidates who should appeal to evangelical voters. Some of those, such as Senator Ted Cruz, are appealing to large numbers of evangelicals and garnering endorsements from other evangelical leaders. For a while, Ben Carson captured the imagination of many evangelicals as well. Rick Santorum showed in 2012 that evangelicals will support conservative Catholics, and thus Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush should find it possible to connect with evangelical voters. Rubio in particular speaks rather eloquently about the significance of his faith for both his personal life and political world view. John Kasich speaks very naturally about his faith as well. In short, Donald Trump is a less obvious fit for evangelical voters than very nearly any other serious Republican candidate.

Finally, it’s not just that Trump is not a natural fit for evangelicals. He seems designed to repel them. It is not just that Trump has had extramarital affairs, as Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse noted on Twitter recently. Trump has bragged about being a serial philanderer, about sleeping with many married women. “Beautiful, famous, successful, married,” Trump once bragged, “I’ve had them all, secretly, the world’s biggest names.” It would be easy to come up with around a thousand reasons why evangelicals should not vote Trump. Opposition research would require only the thinnest of effort.Evangelical leaders once criticized Jimmy Carter for giving an interview to Playboy, whose cover Trump once graced. Trump winning the evangelical vote is like Rick Santorum leading among gay Democrats. He is attracting those whom he should naturally repel.

So, what gives?

First, as my co-blogger Thomas Kidd has noted on many occasions, American evangelicals are anything but monolithic. Keep in mind that in many states, evangelicals comprise a majority of GOP primary voters. More than half in Iowa in 2012. Nearly half in Florida. Nearly two-thirds in South Carolina. About a quarter of Americans identify themselves as white evangelical or “born-again” Christians. As one would expect of any large group, evangelicals have diverse views among themselves.

Second, there is no national evangelical leader. Instead, there are thousands of pastors, parachurch organizations, and media figures with influence, but any single leader’s influence only stretches so far. Thus, Jerry Falwell Jr.’s endorsement was coveted, as was Tony Perkins’s, but neither man’s endorsement counts for a great many votes. Trump has benefited from the fact that there was no wave of evangelical endorsements for any single opponent.

Third, many evangelicals do not trust any Washington or “establishment” politicians to actually support pro-life or pro-traditional marriage positions once elected. Evangelical leaders in particular have long memories of past promises from politicians such as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, who pledged to support constitutional amendments to protect school prayer or traditional marriage but were not actually committed to such issues. Evangelical leaders in particular have long perceived themselves as unwanted and disdained interlopers in the Republican Party. Sure, there is no reason to think a President Trump would care about such issues either, but that does not mitigate Trump’s outsider, anti-establishment appeal. When the media and the political establish quickly made clear their disdain for Trump last summer, it enhanced his standing among others who also attract that disdain.

Finally, Trump rose to the top of his polls last summer because of his strident opposition to illegal immigration and to high levels of immigration generally. The conventional political wisdom has been that the Republican Party needs to abandon its opposition to illegal immigration in order to win presidential elections. That wisdom is folly in GOP primaries. And whether or not it is wisdom or folly in the general election remains to be seen. And many Republican evangelical voters share Trump’s anti-immigration sentiment.

Evangelicals have supported conservative politicians like Ronald Reagan who learned how to speak their language and express concern for their issues. They’ve voted for Republicans such as George W. Bush, who could convincingly talk about having had born-again spiritual experiences themselves. At times, evangelicals have rebelled against the party establishment, as when they voted for Pat Robertson in 1988 or Rick Santorum in 2012. And in the end, evangelicals have voted for whomever the Republican Party has nominated.

I did not think Donald Trump had a credible path to the Republican nomination a few months ago. I was wrong. He does. Much of the evangelical vote remains up for grabs, but it is now not inconceivable that Trump could win a plurality or even a majority of evangelical primary votes.

About the only thing for certain is that whomever the Republicans nominate, that candidate will win at least seventy percent of the evangelical vote against Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. In other words, should Trump capture the nomination, most evangelicals will vote for him this coming fall, whether with enthusiasm or apprehension. The more Trump solidifies his lead, the more he will solidify his support among evangelicals.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • kierkegaard71

    Many of the evangelical “leaders” who are opposed to Trump were the same evangelicals who said that we have to “suck it up” and support Romney and McCain – to quote Trump, “we have no choice.” When it comes to pro-life issues, it’s no better. The Republican Party never has pursued the pro-life agenda with much fervor at all. The Republican leadership, under Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, continue to allow Planned Parenthood to be funded by the government. I am not a Trump supporter, but I am tired of believing lies made to social conservatives. Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, are all made from the same piece of cloth. It strains credulity to think that they would deviate from the Paul Ryan/Mitch McConnell approach, when the “rubber hits the road”. Ronald Reagan gave us Anthony Kennedy, George H.W. Bush, David Souter. A growing number of evangelicals have no use for this. So, I conclude there is a marginal practical difference between continuing to support the same type of guys trotted out by “conservative” leadership and supporting a guy with no formal political experience who claims to have changed his mind on the pro-life issue. Among the many reasons I won’t support Trump is his personal character. However, the current GOP alternatives are not worthy of evangelical voters’ confidence either.

  • stefanstackhouse

    This Evangelical will not be voting for Mr. Trump, or for Mr. Cruz, or for Ms. Clinton, or for Mr. Sanders. I would like to be able to vote for Mr. Kasich, but that is looking increasingly unlikely to be an option. If need be, I’ll cast a write-in protest vote for “None of the above”. I’ve done it before and have absolutely no hesitations about doing it again.

  • jp

    If the choice is Trump or Clinton, I too will vote for neither. It will probably result in a landslide for Clinton, andd we can all pray for gridlock to continue.

  • HenryC

    Much of the Evangelical vote will be voting against Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sander, and for whoever they feel i most likely to defeat them.

  • As an outsider (British) I look at articles such as the above, and the trend it highlights, and I am flummoxed. Stunned. Reeling with the knowledge that people who believe the same Bible as me, that would probably identify with much of my (reformed) theology, and that stand as representatives of Christ on a global scale due to their vocal Churchianity, would consider voting for Trump, who appears to be representative of all that the rest of the world, and Biblical ethics, frankly, consider reprehensible. The fact that a majority of evangelicals are making their decision not based on gross inequality, not on anti-corruption, not on the evils of corporate sponsored psudo-democratic systems, but on immigration!?! In an immigrant country!?! With clear biblical guidance on treating the stranger and sojourner with kindness and fairness? It seems like American republichristians can overlook the most offensive, ugly, bigoted and pandering rhetoric in an attempt to stem the tide of the collapse of Christendom.
    I understand the desire for change, and the disgust at “business as usual” in politics that the trend represents, but I can only imagine that this oafish, ignorant hate-monger has not just tapped into the reality TV culture, a kind of Jerry Springer democracy (though I recognise I am dating myself with that reference!), but has caught the wave of fear that must be swelling beneath the feet of many Christian brothers and sisters over there as it threatens to do over here: a fear of losing privilege, position, power, a genuine fear of loss of life and liberty.
    However we must remember that we have no reason to be afraid bar the sin we leave unconfessed and the good we leave undone. It is God who we fear. Decisions made from any other fear are bad decisions.
    So I plead, once again as an outsider, please don’t let the world think that Trump represents us. I will have to spend more time explaining why Christ is not like that, and how I am not represented by that demographic, time that should be spent introducing folk to Christ Himself.

  • Renee Lynn

    I’m seriously considering voting “NOTA” as well.