Is a 3-D Backlash Underway? USA Today Wonders

“Is a 3-D backlash underway?” With this question, Mike Snider begins his recent article in USA Today: “3-D movies, gadgets getting lukewarm reception by some.”

The President and First Lady watching the 2009 Super Bowl in 3-D. This photo released from the White House.

Given what appears to be the growing omnipresence of 3-D films and other media, why would Snider wonder about a backlash? He explains:

Trailers for Shark Night 3D, a PG-13 film swarming into theaters this weekend, note prominently that the movie is “also showing in 2D.”

Dolphin Tale, out in three weeks, takes a similar tack. Several summer 3-D films fell flat, and studios appear to be covering their bets by letting moviegoers know there’s a lower-priced traditional viewing option.

“If you do a side-by-side of the movie posters of the last three years, that ‘3-D’ almost keeps getting smaller and smaller in the actual posters,” says Jeff Bock of industry tracking firm Exhibitor Relations.

Why might 3-D be losing ground to good ol’ fashioned 2-D? The USA Today article points mainly to the increased costs of 3-D technology. 3-D movies can be $3 to $5 more than 2-D. And 3-D glasses and televisions are also fairly pricey.

But I think this article misses some of the main reasons 3-D is faltering. For one thing, the visual quality of a 3-D film in theaters is not great. Yes, you get 3-D. But you lose quite a bit in brightness. For me, this makes 3-D movies generally less desirable than 3-D, especially if the movie includes crucial scenes in the dark. Moreover, there’s the discomfort factor of wearing 3-D glasses. This is especially true if you wear eyeglasses.

3-D effects do not make great movies great. If you have strong acting and, above all, a compelling story, then you don’t need to see anything in 3-D to love the movie. No amount of 3-D technology can make a bad film good. As far as I’m concerned, Hollywood should forget about 3-D distractions and focus on making movies that tell good stories.

"If you look at church growth, you will see it in areas of the world ..."

Should We Replace “Evangelical”? A Simple ..."
"And you're a pathetic attention whore, desperate for affirmation."

Should We Replace “Evangelical”? A Simple ..."
"My Calvinists Bible teacher in middle school told us Jesus didn't cry because when babies ..."

The Little Lord Jesus, No Crying ..."
"Who are we trying to please - God, or the secular culture?I see the evangelical ..."

Should We Replace “Evangelical”? A Simple ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment