Papias, Jesus, and the Miraculous Vines

Papias, Jesus, and the Miraculous Vines February 7, 2020

Based on long study of Christian history, I offer a couple of strictly non-scientific impressions and guidelines. The first is that the religion is more consistently weird in its expressions than we usually assume. Also, we can find a remarkable number of long-term continuities and connections, if we remain open to noticing them. And finally, any long-term exploration of such links has to travel a long way outside the familiar world of European Christendom. To illustrate these points, I will use the words of a once revered figure in the early church, who seems to be recording a very primitive tradition of words and ideas once attributed to Jesus himself. Those words have entirely dropped out of the mainstream or canonical tradition, but they are preserved in some remarkably devious and out of the way sources. Even if these ideas did not stem from Jesus personally, they represent a strikingly early stage of Christian tradition – and as I say, one that has largely been lost t the mainstream story.

Let me begin with a specific passage attributed to Jesus, and actually, attributed in quite solid early authority. The source is bishop Papias,of whom I shall say more shortly, as he was quoted by Irenaeus around 180 . Relying on Papias’s lost fourth book, Irenaeus cites the following,

as the elders who saw John, the disciple of the Lord, related that they had heard from him how the Lord used to teach in regard to these times, and say: The days will come in which vines shall grow, having each ten thousand branches, and in each branch ten thousand twigs, and in each true twig ten thousand shoots, and in every one of the shoots ten thousand clusters, and on every one of the clusters ten thousand grapes, and every grape when pressed will give five-and-twenty metretes of wine. And when any one of the saints shall lay hold of a cluster, another shall cry out, ‘I am a better cluster, take me; bless the Lord through me.’ In like manner, [He said] that a grain of wheat would produce ten thousand ears, and that every ear would have ten thousand grains, and every grain would yield ten pounds of clear, pure, fine flour; and that apples, and seeds, and grass would produce in similar proportions.

He further reported that Judas had challenged these remarks, but Jesus replied, “They shall see who shall come to them.”

So did Jesus ever say that?

Who Was Papias?

Papias himself was bishop of the major Phrygian city of Hierapolis, in what is now southwestern Turkey. Hierapolis was close to such early centers of Christian expansion as Colossae and Laodicea, and the cities addressed in the Book of Revelation. Hierapolis claimed some connections with the apostle Philip. Papias served as its bishop in the second century, although scholars differ whether they would place his career closer to 100 or 150: I would put his main writings early, around 115. Irenaeus called him a hearer of John and a companion of the martyr Polycarp, and Papias himself reported a tradition that he had received from the daughters of Philip. Papias also drew a distinction between John the apostle and another second John, a presbyter, and his remarks feature centrally in any work on the Johannine tradition.

Papias wrote a crucially important (and now-lost) book entitled the  Expositions of Oracles of the Lord, which survives in quotes from later church Fathers (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, iii 39). Through contacts with the spiritual heirs and pupils of the apostles, he collected a sizable body of oral teachings attributed to Jesus and his first followers. In terms of church history, he was an early witness, and a weighty and widely-connected one.

So critical was Papias to the church’s historical memory that it is amazing that he is not recalled as a pivotal Church Father, whose every writing should have been carefully preserved. However, he had the misfortune to hold chiliastic ideas, envisioning Christ’s establishment of a literal and material millennial kingdom on Earth (both chiliasm and millennial derive from the words for thousand, respectively in Greek and Latin). He may well have been reflecting views widely held in the mainstream church of his time. As the years progressed, though, he was retroactively labeled a heretic, and by the fourth century Eusebius dismisses him as a bumbler of small intelligence.

But let’s go back to that passage he attributes to Jesus. The connection claimed here to John (in this case, the apostle) is interesting, given Jesus’s sayings about vines in the fifteenth chapter of John’s Gospel. Was Papias’s passage originally part of that or a similar Johannine text, or perhaps a commentary or meditation on that? We have to wonder just how close we came to having that incorporated into the canonical New Testament, especially when it came seemingly so well attested.

Jewish Roots: Enoch and 2 Baruch

This “vineyard” language would obviously have an immense appeal to an audience in an agricultural society. But as many scholars have noted, they also have a deep historical background, particularly in the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. As so often in these instances, we look first to the words attributed to Enoch. In 1 Enoch, we read that “each measure will produce a thousand, and each measure of olives will produce ten baths of oil” (10.19-20).

A much closer parallel appears in 2 Baruch, The Book of the Apocalypse of Baruch the Son of Neriah, a Jewish text probably composed at the end of the first century, but which was widely used by Christians. Describing the messianic age, the book prophesies that:

The earth also shall yield its fruit ten-thousandfold and on each vine there shall be a thousand branches, and each branch shall produce a thousand clusters, and each cluster produce a thousand grapes, and each grape produce a cor of wine. (29.5)

The Apocalypse of Paul

The motif continued to circulate in the Christian world as well as the Jewish. In the third or fourth century, the Apocalypse of Paul (Visio Pauli) claimed to report the visions of heaven and Hell received by the apostle. In one section, the angel tells Paul that,

When Christ whom thou preachest cometh to reign, then by the decree of God the first earth shall be dissolved, and then shall this land of promise be shown and it shall be like dew or a cloud; and then shall the Lord Jesus Christ the eternal king be manifested and shall come with all his saints to dwell therein; and he shall reign over them a thousand years, and they shall eat of the good things which now I will show thee. And I looked round about that land and saw a river flowing with milk and honey. ….

And the trees were full of fruits from the root even to the upper branches. …. From the root of each tree up to its heart there were ten thousand branches with tens of thousands of clusters, [and there were ten thousand clusters on each branch,] and there were ten thousand dates in each cluster. And thus was it also with the vines. Every vine had ten thousand branches, and each branch had upon it ten thousand bunches of grapes, and every bunch had on it ten thousand grapes. And there were other trees there, myriads of myriads of them, and their fruit was in the same proportion.           [adapting M R James’s translation]

Significantly, the setting for this image is precisely that offered by Papias, namely the thousand year earthly reign of Christ. Is this work drawing directly on Papias’s writings, or on a more widespread Christian tradition? If it is using Papias directly, one speculation comes naturally to mind. Although this is unprovable, might other portions of the Apocalypse of Paul be quoting other lost works of Papias, especially his famous five books?

In any case, the Apocalypse of Paul was a hugely popular work in medieval Europe, bringing these ideas to a widespread audience. Originally written in Greek, we have translations in Coptic, Syriac, Irish, and other languages, and many Latin versions exist. (See J. K. Elliott, The Apocryphal New Testament, 616-644).

Other Appearances

We also find a strange text that presently survives only in Coptic, and bizarrely titled An Encomium On Saint John The Baptist By Saint John Chrysostom. Jesus leads the apostles on a tour of the Third Heaven in which John now resides, leading Thomas to ask about the trees and their fruits. Jesus responds,

“I will hide nothing from you about the things concerning which ye have questioned Me. As regardeth the vine, concerning the fruit of which ye have asked, there are ten thousand bunches of grapes upon it, and each bunch will produce six metrites [of wine]. As regardeth  the palm-trees in Paradise, each cluster yieldeth ten thousand dates, and each cluster is as long as a man is high. So likewise is it in the matter of the fig-trees; each shoot produceth ten thousand figs, and if three men were to partake of one fig each of them would be satisfied. On each ear of the wheat which is in Paradise there are ten thousand grains, and each grain produceth six measures of flour.”

Here again, the words are placed in Jesus’s own mouth.

Among other references, we turn to the medieval text called The Vision of Enoch the Just, or Armenian Enoch. This is apparently a translation of a Greek text from the seventh or eighth centuries which uses prophecy as a vehicle for describing current politics, in this case the wars of Byzantine and Islamic rulers. It is in other words much later than the other texts I am describing, and has no obvious connections with the vast Enoch literature. Describing the future golden age though, “Enoch” prophesies that “One grain of corn shall give one hundred ears of corn and one branch of the wine one thousand bunches of grapes.” This is speculative, but perhaps this Vision was in fact using some ancient Jewish Enoch literature as a framework for its later political account. If so, that would be another example of the older Jewish (and Enochian) roots of the motif I am looking at here.

Tracing the Ten Thousand Grapes

The “ten thousand-fold” image, in short, offers a fascinating example of how ideas and sayings developed and circulated in the early church. What we have here is an image that originated in the Jewish world of Enoch (?second century BC?). But it developed in more florid form (fruit ten-thousand-fold) in the apocalyptic world of messianic expectation during the late first/early second centuries AD. This was after all the period between the two great Jewish revolts.

It is an open question whether the explicitly Jewish version in 2 Baruch is earlier than the saying quoted by Papias, or whether the one influenced the other. As so often, the story reminds us of the very thin boundaries that still separated Christians from their Jewish background, even after the Fall of Jerusalem. It also demonstrates the powerful hold that ideas originating in Enoch had on the early church: all roads lead back to Enoch! Without the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, it is very difficult to make sense of early Christianity.

Originally, the “ten thousand-fold” motif perhaps circulated free of any association with Jesus. For Papias, though, not only has it become firmly identified as a Jesus saying in the oral tradition, but it has already been fitted into a narrative dialogue with Judas. Lest we think that Papias was credulous about such things (as Eusebius certainly thought), Irenaeus has no difficulty accepting that context.

If the thousand-fold image was not recorded in any of the gospels as we have them, it did not vanish entirely. Through its preservation in 2 Baruch, and even more in the Apocalypse of Paul, it remained in wide circulation through the Middle Ages and beyond.

I have just outlined the story here, but it would be intriguing to follow that motif through later eras, and especially through Islamic writings.

 

I am drawing here on material from my 2017 book Crucible of Faith; and also adapting a column I posted at this site in 2013.

 

 

"Referring to God as "Mother" or with other female titles is completely unbiblical. The female ..."

Because We Have Made God Too ..."
"a student had disrupted her talk, just like a student had disrupted Kathy Khang."When someone ..."

Because We Have Made God Too ..."
"Who says we are a secular nation? You and atheists? Where did you get that? ..."

Evangelical Silence and Trump: A Reformation ..."
"Personal attack. Once you run out of reason fuel and facts, you engage in personal ..."

Evangelical Silence and Trump: A Reformation ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment