In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky’s protagonist, Raskolnikov, offers a chilling simplification of the human condition:
“I simply wanted to have the daring… and I killed. I only wanted to dare, Sonia! That’s what seduced me—what made me want to become a Napoleon. That’s why I murdered.”
Beneath all his tortured philosophy and moral calculation lies a stark self-diagnosis: he is either a louse (i.e., an ordinary, forgettable nobody) or a legend – an extraordinary man, worthy of bending the rules that bind the rest of us.
It’s easy to dismiss Raskolnikov’s logic as the fever dream of a guilt-ridden criminal, but his binary framework is surprisingly familiar in our own cultural moment. The world of social media is driven by precisely this dichotomy. Either you are someone—liked, followed, influential—or you’re invisible. Either you are a name, or you are noise. The unspoken theology of our age is that value is tied to visibility. If you’re not seen, you’re not significant.
But what happens to us— psychologically, spiritually, communally— when we begin to divide the world this way?
The New Asceticism of Being Seen
In a society drowning in digital exposure, we’ve traded monasteries for Instagram stories. Personal branding is the fast path to public sainthood. We measure our days not by fruitfulness or faithfulness, but by engagement metrics. The desire to be “extraordinary” no longer means having Napoleon’s daring; it now means having enough viral content to escape anonymity.
Raskolnikov’s despair stems from the unbearable possibility that he might simply be ordinary, that his life might not matter. So he commits murder, hoping to prove that he is more. Likewise, many today burn themselves out, contort their image, and even betray their deepest convictions – not for love or truth, but for the illusion of influence. When meaning is outsourced to visibility, then being invisible is tantamount to being nonexistent. This is the quiet violence of the binary: it dehumanizes the ordinary.
The Theology of Recognition
What Raskolnikov fails to grasp (and what our culture forgets) is that being extraordinary in the eyes of the world is a deeply unstable foundation for self-worth. It is a form of borrowed glory, always contingent on others’ perception. It’s no coincidence that in an age where digital platforms promise mass validation, depression, anxiety, and loneliness are skyrocketing. The self can’t survive long on the oxygen of external recognition.
From a theological perspective, this binary also mirrors a deeper spiritual lie: that worth must be earned, not received. In my own work, I’ve explored how honor-shame cultures and Western performance-based paradigms both distort the gospel by making divine acceptance conditional. Similarly, the Raskolnikov logic collapses human identity into performance and reputation. It renders grace unintelligible. After all, grace honors the unremarkable.
Either/Or: A False Choice
The tragedy of Raskolnikov’s dilemma (and the modern echo of it) is that it offers a false choice. Human beings are neither insects to be crushed nor gods to be worshiped. The imago Dei doesn’t fluctuate with follower counts or societal recognition. There is dignity in obscurity, holiness in the hidden life.
But our culture rarely tells that story. In a world that teaches us to curate our lives for applause, the life lived in quiet faithfulness appears not just boring but wasteful. Yet it may be the very place where the deepest freedom is found. Raskolnikov’s nightmare wasn’t that he was a criminal; it was that he had no category for grace. He had no place for the ordinary to be good.
Recovering the Ordinary
What if the call is not to be seen but to be faithful? What if obscurity is not a curse but a context for love?
The binary Raskolnikov offers, either louse or legend, is seductive but corrosive. It cannot sustain a coherent anthropology, much less a life of joy or purpose. As long as we believe that we must be extraordinary to matter, we will remain restless, anxious, and tragically alone.
Dostoevsky seems to suggest that redemption begins when we abandon the delusion of greatness and allow ourselves to be found, not as the world sees us, but as we are: loved in our smallness, dignified in our hiddenness. That, in the end, may be the most extraordinary thing of all.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In