Here’s an article from the BBC about abortion. Indian culture prizes boys more than girls, and with expensive dowries to pay Indian couples regard too many baby girls as a disadvantage. With pre natal scanning they are choosing to abort their daughters—simply because they are female.

What is interesting about this report is that the BBC (quite rightly) want to portray this as a crime. So they have coined a new word with negative connotations: it is ‘female foeticide’. But of course, any abortion–male or female–is foeticide, so why don’t they use this new word for all their discussions of abortion?

Can’t any of these folks see the double standard? “Abortion” is a women’s right to choose, while “female foeticide” is wrong? Surely, according to the prevailing pro choice arguments an Indian woman has the right to choose ‘foeticide’ if she wishes? Isn’t it just that liberal Western feminists want to choose ‘foeticide’ for their own set of reasons, while denying Indian women the right to choose ‘foeticide’ simply because they regard the Indian womens’ reasons to be somehow more barbaric?

In fact, for any mother anywhere to choose to kill her unborn child is barbaric. It is just as cruel and barbaric to kill a female feotus in New Delhi for social reasons as it is for a woman in New York to kill her foetus for social reasons. One woman kills a baby because she would prefer a boy and because the girl will demand an expensive dowry. The other kills the baby because it will be detrimental to her figure, her career or her love life.

At least the BBC have come far enough to regard abortion as foeticide. They should now be consistent and demand its abolition everwhere–not just for Indian women.

"Catholicism has always defined the ideal but there are no limits on God's mercy and ..."

Tony Palmer: Is There Salvation Outside ..."
"With all due respect, Shaun, are you relegating the actual Faith to whatever the local ..."

Notes on Tony Palmer’s Funeral
"There are good parking valets and bad parking valets. There are good housesitters and bad ..."

The Case for Conversion to Catholicism
"did you vote for Bush Fr Longenecker? would you have?"

Understanding Iraq

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Anonymous

    Agreed, Father. An important point well made. Steve

  • Anonymous

    It’s really mind numbing, isn’t it? I think that is the only reason that they can produce such stupidity and call it reality. Their minds are numb from their “pro-choice” contortions.Sharon

  • Such internal contradictions are reasons why the abortion cabal wants to pre-empt any discussion.

  • Anonymous

    With a Mac, one can go from an affected form to the outright archaic fœtus.”