The Encounter with Christ

Anyone who cares about promoting the Christian faith will want to encourage individuals towards an authentic encounter with Christ. Time and again the present Holy Father has stressed the fact that Christianity is an encounter with a real person, and not simply intellectual assent to a list of doctrines or strict observance of a list of regulations. However, what does the ‘encounter with Christ’ consist of?
Where I live in the Bible Belt of the American South the ‘encounter with Christ’ means ‘getting saved’ or ‘accepting Jesus into your heart’. This religious experience most often follows a particular pattern: Evangelical preaching about sin or some human problem or the need to ‘know that you’re going to heaven when you die’ brings about an examination of conscience. An invitation to say the sinner’s prayer follows. This is basically a prayer of repentance and an acceptance of Christ’s saving work for that individual. The person is then encouraged to acknowledge that they have ‘been saved’ by coming forward to pray with someone, or by sharing their decision with a fellow believer.
This transaction can happen at an Evangelical church  service, but it might just as well take place individually and privately after a conversation between two people. Thus an ordinary Christian could ‘lead someone to salvation’ or ‘save a soul’. Most often this activity is linked with the Calvinistic belief in ‘eternal security’ which means that the now saved person belongs to Jesus forever and he can be certain that he is going to heaven when he dies.
Now this is all well and good, and I’m glad that so many people have entered into Christian belief in this simple way, but it has it’s problems. What about the good Christian folk who have never had that particular formulaic experience? What about the ones who did, but then walked away from it and started to live like the devil? Do they need to ‘get saved again’? Can they lose their salvation? There are more difficult questions: this form of religious experience is most often very highly manipulated emotionally. A long sermon focussing on sin or unhappiness builds up desire for a solution. Emotional music softens the heart and promotes feelings of guilt and longing for release. Peer pressure and emotional pressure brings the person to the point of ‘getting saved’. Does the manipulation mean that it is all bogus? Not necessarily, but many people are impervious to the emotional manipulation and actually respond in an opposite manner. Consequently, the ‘altar call’ of Evangelicalism may actually deter as many people as it convinces.
This is just one example of how the ‘Christ encounter’ has been equated with subjective emotionalism. There are others. I happen to be very moved by classical music, fine architecture, a beautiful liturgy and emotional restraint. I come out of a ‘high church’ liturgy with great feelings of religious emotion. Does that mean I have had an encounter with Christ? Maybe, but maybe I was simply moved by the beauty in a similar way that the Evangelical is moved by the preaching, the simple emotional music and the other factors in that service. Some are moved by stirring preaching. Others are inspired and moved by their intellectual studies of theology. Others get all worked up in a charismatic service with hands waving, bodies swaying and all sorts of hootin’ and hollerin’. Others believe that you ‘encounter Christ’ through the pursuit of your heart’s desire–that Christ is locked into the thing you love, and as you pursue that you will find him. Maybe. Maybe not.
What concerns me about all these versions of the ‘encounter with Christ’ is not that they are worthless, but that, on their own, they can actually be barriers to a true encounter with Christ. Each one of them may be part of a valid encounter with Christ, or a first step to an encounter with Christ, but they are not, themselves the encounter with Christ. If a person believes that they are the encounter with Christ they may well be mistaken and be following a lie. The fact that we have these ‘stepping stone encounters’ in a way that suits our personality and approach to life is what is at once both reassuring and worrying.
The catechism of the Catholic Church teaches us where we encounter Christ objectively. This objectivity balances and completes the ‘stepping stone encounters’. The CCC says we encounter Christ in 1. the Sacred Scriptures 2. the Eucharistic Assembly 3. the person of the priest 4. the consecrated elements 5. the person of the poor. 
These five places to encounter Christ seem pretty adequate to me, and all the others seem not only rather hard work, but also subjective, unreliable and well, rather phony.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/03097572935671785197 A’ine

    I must admit, although I am a Protestant (Baptist), and a Calvinist, I fully agree with you regarding the easy-believism, emotionally charged, heart-string pulling altar call issue. The church I was brought up in, and the churches I've attended since, do not give altar calls or focus on altar calls, or give a formulaic salvation message or approach. Pretty much everyone I know has a very different conversion experience, and I personally, to my current knowledge, do not know of anyone with a conversion story stemming from that. I think God is bigger than us, bigger than our formulas, and every time we try and box Him in, and figure Him out, He will work in a different way. The basic foundation comes down to this: being brought to our knees with the realization of Who God is, and who I am…and that His grace & mercy meet me where I am, and bring me to life in Him. The wonder of it all…I appreciate reading your blog, your ideas, and your thoughts about things…it gives me food for thought, and this Canadian Protestant Baptist appreciates your take on things very much! God bless!

  • http://jenniferfitz.wordpress.com/ jenniferfitz

    Father, I'm speaking here as a southern catholic fully immersed in the evangelical world you describe:I think you are tossing out too much.The Catechism has quite a lot to say about prayer. For lack of access to the sacraments, what else should a sincere protestant do, other than pray?And it is not all bad to have some memorable moment when you consciously choose the faith. Or, lacking that, a moment when you realize you've chosen it.Jen.[Otherwise I agree with you on the abuses of the sinners' prayer, the lousy theology, and the importance of objectivity. Though I'd hate for my family to only try to encounter me objectively, and never desire any emotional connection.]

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/12044861299107622964 Riley

    I was badgered by my father into "joining" the Baptist Church at 12 years old, at the uusal summer revival. Got baptized and then what? Nothing. I did manage to live like hell for five years in college.Having been confirmed in the Catholic Church this past Easter Vigil, I am now home. God has had great mercy on me.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/05336781734419554046 broken

    I like this particular post it's thought provoking. Where and when have I encountered Christ? I'll be thinking about this one for days and betting that it matches up with the CCC. My deepest encounters with Christ have been through suffering(the Cross), others and my own. I believe that would be #5 the person of the poor.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/12303498495183145184 David R. Collins

    The person of the priest? What does that mean? The priest as a person? Like Father Mike is great at basketball so Jesus must be too? Or Father Jim loves scotch, and so does the Lord? But seriously, that's a tall order to fill. How do you deal with that?

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/08553863040247715489 Lucerna

    I agree with you in the various ways of encountering Christ. However, I'm with Jennifer in thinking you might be throwing something important away.Pope John Paul II is my hero for bringing the subjective aspect of our faith into harmony with the objective. Crossing the threshold of faith is meant to be an experience of deep interpersonal intimacy. Check out Catechesi Tradendae 5,on intimacy. check out Dies domini 15 on the intense dialogue between the soul and Christ, meant to be happening. Check out Ecclessia in Africa 57, on what should happen when the proclamation of the Gospel is effective. Check out what Redemptoris Missio 46 on the need for a personal decision. Check out Ecclessia in Asia 31 on the need for the christian community to be rooted in an "experience" of God.I quote all this to say, I think we remain more reticent than recent popes to say that a conscious personal encounter with the living Christ is both possible and necessary.Many people have encounters with Christ (objectively speaking) but it doesn't register on a conscious, subjective level. The lights are not on.[I'm not talking about the state of the mature Christian when God suspends the sensible perception of his presence....I'm talking about baptized people who have not come to know Christ in a personal way.]

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/11740482509910163332 Gail F

    DRC: Father L is not talking about the individual priest, but the fact that we have priests — real live people who stand in the place of Christ for us at the mass and at sacraments — not just a book to read and a nice man who preaches. At certain times the priest is Christ for us. That's what he's for and that's why ordination is a sacrament.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X