Why Religion Matters

With the death of Margaret Thatcher the conversations have been buzzing about the goodness or otherwise of trickle down economics, Thatcherism, Reaganomics–you name it.

What people don’t seem to get is that any economic or political system, without personal virtue, will be a failure. Every ideology will fail. Every economic system will fail. Every political system will collapse. None of them can ever be any better than the individuals who operate them. Conversely, with individual virtue, any political system or economic program will be a wonderful success.

I mean the simple, old fashioned personal virtues of hard work, simplicity, generosity, compassion, humility, loyalty, chastity, modesty and a sense of humor. With such virtues any political system or economic system–any society will prosper and thrive.

However, where does one learn such virtues and practice such virtues? The atheist might argue that these virtues can be learned within a secular educational setting or within a secular family setting. But why should an atheist have any motivation for promoting such virtues and why would a young atheist have any motivation to adopt such virtues? If life simply IS and the universe is indifferent why should I not be indifferent and simply self interested? Why should I adopt virtues which would impinge on my personal freedom and personal pleasure?

If we are products of natural selection and the survival of the fittest is the rule of life, then why would anyone want to adopt any other set of values that would impede one’s survival? If there is no eternal dimension to life, and each person is simply a smart chimpanzee, then why have compassion or be generous? The atheist might say, “Because we are wired to be that way. The higher virtues are part of what it means to be human.” Really? It seems that exactly the opposite proposition is true, that to be human is to have fallen away from the natural inclination to practice virtue.

Virtue is learned through religion. However, we must reject the simplistic approach which many believe religion teaches. That is the idea that virtue is necessary in order to be rewarded with eternal life. This is a version of the heresy of Pelagianism which teaches salvation by good works. It is a false religion that teaches that virtue is the price one pays for an eternal reward. If this were true, then virtue is simply another form of self interest.

The Christian religion teaches something far more radical. It does not teach that virtue is a system of obeying the rules in order to win the game or that virtue is the price one pays for pie in the sky. Instead virtue is seen as the result of an inner transformation in the individual. What we are talking about is conversion of Life. A person is supernaturally transformed by Divine grace into the image and likeness of Christ. From this inner transformation the individual begins to naturally-supernaturally live a virtuous life. He does not do virtuous things, he becomes Virtuous.

To be sure, one needs to practice virtue, but this is because practice makes perfect. In religious terms this truism is more than an cliche. Practice of virtue, infused with divine grace, really does make the person perfect–and by perfect we mean “whole” “complete”–”all that we were created to be.”

This is the Christian vision of society: not filled with people going about doing good, but people Being Good because they have become Good, and this is why religion matters, because the true Christian religion is not simply about teaching people to be virtuous–that can be done without religion by the Boy Scouts or the local women’s club.

Religion matters because true religion imparts the supernatural graces necessary for this transformation, and the reason so much of the Christian religion has failed is not because it is wrong, but because it has been reduced to a method of teaching people to be nice and good rather than imparting the power of inner and eternal transformation.

 

  • Mike

    Yeah but we’re removing religion from our public squares. We’re not interested in the goods it provides; we want to figure things out for ourselves: we don’t trust anyone anymore except it seems celebrities and celebrity politicians. It seems to me, that some aspects of western culture are coming apart or drifting aimlessly.

  • Pingback: Because Creativity and Time Evade Me… | Knowledge Hungry

  • Psy

    Its pretty sad that you personally had to be taught to have compassion for others or not to steal or murder because couldn’t work it out internally on your own.

    • Thorgasm

      Where do you think you got the idea from, smart guy? The stereotypical neckbeard (i.e., you) stands on the shoulders of Judeo-Christian world view when it comes to morality, while denying its foundations. Highly irrational if you ask me.

  • Michael

    But despite your assertions to the contrary, atheists, with no promise of eternal life, with no Holy Scriptures to guide them and having no infusion of the divine Grace live good, productive and virtuous lives. And it puzzles you and many religious people. How can atheists be good without God? Until a person realizes that you can be good without God it’s probably best for society that they stay religious.

    • Fr. Dwight Longenecker

      Non Christians may indeed attain a human level of virtue, but without divine grace they will not be spiritually transformed from within.

      • Psy

        Unsubstantiated claim, how about some proof?

    • Thorgasm

      “atheists, with no promise of eternal life … live good, productive and virtuous lives”

      Unsubstantiated claim, how about some proof?

  • Michael

    “Virtue is learned through religion.” and “A person is supernaturally transformed by Divine grace into the image and likeness of Christ. From this inner transformation the individual begins to naturally-supernaturally live a virtuous life. He does not do virtuous things, he becomes Virtuous.”

    It not only excludes atheists from the ranks of the Virtuous, but Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and all other religious people who don’y transform into the “image and likeness of Christ”

    I know you don’t mean that, but it sure sounds that way.

    • Fr. Dwight Longenecker

      That is what I mean. However, I do not mean that non-Christians may not therefore do virtuous actions and attain a level of human virtue.

      • Michael

        So a Jew, a Muslim or an atheist may do virtuous acts but they will not be “Virtuous”. So much for ecumenism. You can say that all you want to atheists, we don’t care about your capital “V” Virtuous, but I’d not mention that to non Christians.

  • Wj

    By the way, it is quite possible and even likely that many atheists possess more grace than many Christians do. You need the Church for grace, but you don’t necessarily have to be a card carrying member. This is the teaching of Therese of Lisieux, a doctor of the Church.

    • Thorgasm

      “it is quite possible and even likely that many atheists possess more grace than many Christians do.”

      Unsubstantiated claim, how about some proof?

  • Will J

    I used to think there was more loyalty on the part of employers and employees back in the 1950s. But then I think about all of the things employers and employees did, and realize much of what I perceived as loyalty was more due to the restraint required by society back then. My perception today is that employers treat employees worse that 60 years ago with so many contract jobs and fewer benefits. Perhaps, however, both sides are just being more open and honest and are able to get away with it.

    • mm

      By in large I think you are mistaken. I believe that employees are better treated, but less secure financially in their positions. By that I mean, bosses treat people better interpersonally- organizations are less hierarchal and there is less I intimidation, etc tolerated. This is partly due to a less rigid social structure & partly due to an increase in skill/knowledge based jobs- you can’t treat skilled employees like ditch diggers. But the ideal of lifelong employment & defined benefit retirement is gone(if it was ever really viable)-and it is foolish to blame the company, greedy capitalists etc. People are more responsible for managing their retirement & benefits(ie less paternalism and managerial control). Such changes are a mixed bag, and threaten the positions of union management & politicians who seek to control such things. We are moving to more fluid employment models, but the transition is not complete & many are uncomfortable with the changes(as always occur with change) and seek to avoid the unavoidable. Rather than all out resistance (ala OWS) we need to make legal adaptations that make the system work & safeguard the rights of employees & employers. But the change can be beneficial since it also reflects our more diverse society- less Ossie & Harriet style families.

  • Pingback: Why Religion Matters - Big Pulpit

  • Pingback: Latest Survivalist Blog News | Survivalist Tips

  • Thorgasm

    In order to consider their position rationally, we must first ask what Psy, Michael, and others are even doing here. There is an increasing level of desperation that is reflected in this practice of coming onto to explicitly Christian articles and trying to spread the “Good News” of atheism. It is one thing to put your view out there as a philosophical perspective, but if reason and progress is truly on your side, what need is there to go on the offensive? Why troll the writings of particular authors or websites that no one is forcing you to read? Won’t the “truth” lead people to your side eventually, if what you believe is true? The real reason, I suspect, for this militancy is that atheism is, when carried to its logical conclusion, incoherent:
    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/higher-things/2011/nov/19/atheism-why-it-logically-incoherent
    http://www.catholicthinker.net/the-incoherence-of-atheism/
    http://www.peterkreeft.com/topics-more/4-arguments-transcendence.htm
    http://www.reasonsforgod.org/the-best-reasons/the-argument-from-reason/

  • http://rosarynovice.stblogs.com/ Augustine

    As a late economy minister in my home country used to say: “Socialism would work in only two places: in hell, where it’s always existed, and in Heaven, where it’s not necessary.”


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X