4 Reasons Why John Wesley Opposed the American Revolution

4 Reasons Why John Wesley Opposed the American Revolution July 5, 2017

American Christians invoke John Wesley on all manner of subjects including sanctification, the sacraments, and social holiness. On this most sacred of American holidays, let us consider Wesley’s views on the American Revolution.

John Wesley — courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Wesley, initially ambivalent about American independence, landed in favor of loyalist political arguments. He pointed out that the colonists held the same liberties as other constituent parts of the British empire. Why did these colonists refuse to pay their taxes and insist on destroying “ship-loads of tea” when settlers of all other far-off British territories did not exercise the right of representation in Parliament? In his 1775 “A Calm Address to Our American Colonies,” published three months after fighting at Lexington and Concord, Wesley rebuked the American claim that taxation was tyranny, and he pointed to the many liberties the colonists enjoyed under British rule.

Second, Wesley opposed the partisan fervor of the American patriots. As ministers preached sermons that stoked the fires of war, Wesley cautioned about the consequences of out-of-control protests. He was not impressed by mobs who were “screaming out for liberty.” Too many patriots were “foaming with rage against their quiet neighbours, ready to tear out one another’s throats, and to plunge their swords into each other’s bowels.” In his 1775 sermon “National Sins and Miseries,” Wesley worried that “reason is lost in rage; its small still voice drowned by popular clamour.”

Third, Wesley judged that the Revolution allowed “no liberty of conscience.” Not only were American patriots “mad with party-zeal” against King George, they also fomented against neighbors who disagreed. “None dare print a page, or a line, unless it be exactly conformable to the sentiments of our lords, the people.” What were the allowable sentiments? “None must dare to utter one word, either in favour of King George, or in disfavor of the idol they have set up—the new, illegal, unconstitutional government, utterly unknown to us and to our forefathers.” Public sentiment, he worried, did not allow freedom of speech or conscience on matters of the Revolution.

Fourth, Wesley suggested the irony of proclaiming American freedom as Americans themselves perpetrated slavery. In 1774, as political rhetoric for liberty accelerated in the colonies, he sought to appropriate the same logic on behalf of African slaves. “Are they men as well as we,” Wesley wrote, “and have they not the same sensibility?” The tyrannies of colonist slaveholders were significantly more inhumane than English authority. As historian Mark Noll would later observe, perhaps the only Americans who could legitimately “justify taking up arms to defend themselves” were enslaved African Americans, not their owners George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison.

In short, Wesley dumped on the patriotic parade. He and many other Methodist preachers paid a high price for their dissent. Calling for Americans to be “peaceable” and “full of mercy and good fruits,” Wesley was denounced as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a madman, a chaplain in ordinary to the furies, a cunning fox, a Jesuit in disguise, and a Jacobite traitor.” One minister wrote, “If a person was disposed to persecute a Methodist preacher it was only necessary to call him a Tory and then they might treat him as cruelly as they pleased.” Perversely, Wesley was a pronounced a traitor for being loyal.

Wesley’s descendants in this country have eagerly partaken of American patriotism. American flags frame the fronts of Methodist church sanctuaries, and a nationalistic jingoism pervades many evangelical churches across the country. Perhaps remembering Wesley’s clear-eyed admonitions about violence and rebellion—and Christian perfection and love of enemy—can help modern Methodists become more circumspect about their nation’s myth of origin.

"The lesson of this story, and the current pandemic, appears to be that faith is ..."

The Plague Village
"I think one of the reasons Margaret Thatcher gets very little play in feminist writing ..."

Why We Can’t Have Nice Feminists
"Are you jacking off while spewing about the evil feminists?Sure sounds this way..."

Why We Can’t Have Nice Feminists
"Thank you for your critique, that adds context to Luther's letter. It has added several ..."

About Martin Luther’s Letter on the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • stefanstackhouse

    Even today, to even suggest in public that Wesley might have gotten it right on this can subject one to considerable disapproval, if not abuse. This in turn suggests more than a whiff of idolatry about it.

  • John Flanagan

    Anyone with a real interest in studying history knows that the American Revolution was a messy affair, quite bloody, and divisive. Almost half of the colonists leaned toward the Crown, and being loyalists, were pitted against their own neighbors and former friends, and even within families there were disagreements. And of course, there were those who were neutral, just wanting to farm or engage in commerce, and raise their families in peace. The Palatine Lutherans in upstate New York tried unsuccessfully to stay neutral, and were distrusted by patriot and loyalist alike. Add to the mix the various Native American tribes in the colonies, some of whom fought against Brits, some against the colonists, and some hated every white man. And among the natives, a large number wanted to be left in peace, ultimately screwed by the British and Americans as well. Wesley was probably right, but in the long run, a country was born amidst the turmoil, and this too was God’s plan.

  • Richard Pierard

    Thanks, David, for reminding us of the ambiguities of Christians, e. g., Wesley, about the Revolution. There is so much myth-making about our past, and we so need to have alert historians like him to set the record straight and to keep our feet to the fire of accuracy.. Good work, David and many others like you, who are strugglinng in the age of Trump and fake news. I’m with you all the way, over the hill Dick

  • David Swartz

    Thanks Dick. I’m just trying to follow your example!